Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 1: Evaluating vocal function

References

• Carding PN, Roulstone S, Northstone K; ALSPAC Study Team. The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study. J Voice. 2006;20:623–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, . A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee of Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolayngol. 2001; 258: 77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Wardrop A, Wynne D, Kubba H, McCartney E. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 2: subjective measurement of symptoms of voice disorder. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2012; 37: 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RD. The clinical science of motor speech disorders: a personal assessment. In: Till FA, Yorkston K, Beukelman DR, editors. Motor speech disorders: advances in assessment and treatment. Baltimore: Paul Brooks; 1994. p. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuta T, Patrick L, Garnett JD. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. J Voice. 2004;18:299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Wieneke GH, Dejonckere PH. Documentation of progress in voice therapy: perceptual, acoustic, and laryngostroboscopic findings pretherapy and postthereapy. J Voice. 2004;18:325–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Doyle PC. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. J Voice. 2005;19: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma EP, Yiu EM. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. J Voice. 2006;20:380–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sataloff R. The pediatric larynx and voice: anatomy, development, and emerging developments. In: Hartnick CJ, Boseley ME, editors. Pediatric voice disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2008. p. xiii.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnick CJ, Rehbar R, Prasad V. Development and maturation of the pediatric human vocal fold lamina propria. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerschner JE, Merati AL. Science of voice production from infancy through adolescence. In: Hartnick CJ, Boseley ME, editors. Pediatric voice disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2008. p. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson L. Greene and Mathieson's the voice and its disorders. 6th ed. London: Whurr Publishers; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981. p. 81–4.
   Google Scholar
• Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders, American Speech Language Hearing Association; 2002. Available from: http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/members/.../D3CAPEVprocedures.pdf. Accessed 24 November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Carding P, Carlson E, Epstein R, Mathieson L, Shewell C. Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2000;25:133–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eadie TL, Baylor CR. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgements of dysphonic voices. J Voice. 2006;20:527–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnell MP, Melton SD, Childes JM, Coleman TC, Dailey SA, Hoffman HT. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice. 2007;21:576–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchner LN, Brehm SB, Weinrich B, Middendorf J, deAlarcon A, Levin L, . Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice. J Voice. 2010;24: 441–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee L, Stemple C, Glaze LE. Quick Screen for Voice [CD-ROM]. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson S, Pannbacker M. Evaluating the Quick Screen for Voice: getting started. TEJAS. 2008;XXXI:33–5. Available from: http://www.txsha.org/_pdf/TEJAS/.../06%20Quick%20Screen%20Test.pdf. Accessed 25 November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Papsin BC, Pengilly AJ, Leighton SEJ. The developing role of a paediatric voice clinic: a review of our experience. J Laryngol Otol. 1996;110:1022–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Primov-Fever A, Amir O, Jedwab D. The feasibility of rigid stroboscopy in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:1077–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dejonckere PH. Voice problems in children: pathogenesis and diagnosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;49 (supp 1):S311–4.
   Google Scholar
• D'Antonio L, Chait D, Lotz W, Netsell R. Pediatric videonasoendoscopy for speech and voice evaluation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;94:578–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnick CJ, Zeitels SM. Pediatric video laryngo-stroboscopy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;69:215–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz WK, D'Antonio LL, Chait DH, Netsell RW. Successful nasoendoscopic and aerodynamic examinations of children with speech/voice disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;26:165–72.
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz-Nartowicz H, Sinkiewicz A, Bielecka A. Laryngovideostroboscopy in children—Diagnostics possibilities and constraints. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug; 75(8):1015–7.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly A, Clement WA, Kubba H. Management of dysphonia in children. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:642–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zalzal GH, Loomis SR, Fisher M. Laryngeal reconstruction in children: assessment of vocal quality. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:504–7.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur CJ, Kearns GH, Healy GB. Voice quality after laryngotracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:641–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey CM, Clary RA, Penguilly A, Albert DM. Voice quality following laryngotracheal construction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;32(suppl):s93–5.
   Google Scholar
• Clary RA, Pengilly A, Bailey M, Jones N, Albert D, Comins J, . Analysis of voice outcomes in pediatric patients following surgical procedures for laryngotracheal stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:1189–94.
   Google Scholar
• Baker S, Kelchner L, Weinrich B, Lee L, Willging P, Cotton R, . Pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis and airway reconstruction: A review of voice outcomes, assessment and treatment issues. J Voice. 2006;20:631–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bultemeyer DK. Assessing vocal fold vibratory patterns in the normal population. In: Andrews ML. Manual of voice treatment: Pediatrics through Geriatrics. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Thomson Delmar Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Titze IR. Towards standards in acoustic analysis of voice. J Voice. 1994;8:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits I, Ceuppens P, De Bodt MS. A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and computerized speech lab. J Voice. 2005;19:187–96.
   Google Scholar
• Baken RJ. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. London: Taylor and Francis; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Linders B, Massa GG, Boersma B, Dejonckere P. Fundamental voice frequency and jitter in girls and boys measured with electroglottography: influence of age and height. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;33:61–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campisi P, Tewfick TL, Manoukian JJ, Schloss MD, Pelland-Blais E, Sadeghi N. Computer-assisted voice analysis: establishing a pediatric database. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:156–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicollas R, Garrel R, Ouaknine M, Giovanni A, Nazarian B, Triglia JM. Normal voice in children between 6 and 12 years of age: database and nonlinear analysis. J Voice. 2008;22: 671–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedzielska G. Acoustic analysis in the diagnosis of voice disorders in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;57:189–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedzielska G, Glijer E, Niedzielska A. Acoustic analysis of voice in children with nodule vocals. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;60:119–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kielmann A, Bader C-A. Development of aerodynamic aspects in children's voice. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;31:183–90.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan DE. Maximum phonation time for children with normal voices. J Commun Disord. 1984;17:309–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent RD, Kent JF, Rosenbek JC. Maximum performance tests of speech production. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;52: 367–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckel FC, Boone DR. The s/z ratio as an indicator of laryngeal pathology. J Speech Hear Disord. 1981;46:147–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tait NA, Michel JF, Carpenter MA. Maximum duration of sustained/s/and/z/in children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;45: 239–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fendler M, Shearer WM. Reliability of the s/z ratio in normal children's voices. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1988;19: 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagle J, Hufnagle KK. S/Z ratio in dysphonic children with and without vocal cord nodules. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1988;19:418–22.
   Google Scholar