The effects of cigarette smoking on the female voice

References

• Myerson MC. Smoker's larynx: A clinical pathological entity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1950;106:533–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RF, McDonald JR, Devine KD. The pathologic effects of smoking on the larynx. AMA Arch Pathol. 1955;60:472–80.
   Google Scholar
• Wallner LJ. Smoker's larynx. Laryngoscope. 1954;64:259–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auerbach O, Hammond EC, Garfinkel L. Histologic changes in the larynx in relation to smoking habits. Cancer. 1970; 25:92–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Morrow DL. Videostroboscopic characteristics of young adult female smokers vs. nonsmokers. J Voice. 2007;21:211–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN. The effect of smoking on the dysphonia severity index in females. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63:65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert HR, Weismer GG. The effects of smoking on the speaking fundamental frequency of adult women. J Psycholinguist Res. 1974;3:225–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez J, Carpi A. Early effects of smoking on the voice: A multidimensional study. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:649–56.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy CH, Doyle PC. The effects of cigarette smoking on voice-fundamental frequency. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;97:376–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen D, Horii Y. Cigarette smoking and voice fundamental frequency. J Commun Disord. 1982;15:135–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Knych CL. Acoustic characteristics of the voice in young adult smokers. In: Windsor F, Kelly ML, Hewlett N, editors. Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2002. p. 449–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lee L, Stemple JC, Geiger D, Goldwasser R. Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on objective measures of voice production. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1531–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeitels SM, Hillman RE, Bunting GW, Vaughn T. Reinke's edema: Phonatory mechanisms and management strategies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;106:533–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Alphonso VA. Effects of smoking on respiratory capacity and control. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21:623–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedivitis RA, Barros APB, Queija DS, Alexandre JCM, Rezende WTM, Corazza VR, . Interobserver perceptual analysis of smokers voice. Clin Otolaryngol. 2004;29:124–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennet S, Bishop S, Lumpkin S. Phonatory characteristics associated with bilateral diffuse polypoid degeneration. Laryngoscope. 1987;97:446–50.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett JD. Tobacco and laryngeal pathology. W V Med J. 2001;97:13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lim JY, Choi JN, Kim KM, Choi HS. Voice analysis of patients with diverse types of Reinke's edema and clinical use of electroglottographic measurements. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126:62–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcotullio D, Magliulo G, Pezone T. Reinke's edema and risk factors: Clinical and histopathological aspects. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23:81–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastuszek P, Kręcicki T, Zaleska-Kręcicka M, Jeleń M, Rak J, Krajewska B. Histological and electron microscopic investigation of Reinke's edema. Pol J Pathol. 2003;54:61–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vecerina-Volic S, Kovac D, Gulic R. [Smokers’ edema of the vocal folds]. Lijec Vjes. 1997;119:1–4. Croatian.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yonekawa H. A clinical study of Reinke's edema. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1988;15:57–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallus S, Bosetti C, Franceschi S, Levi F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Laryngeal cancer in women: Tobacco, alcohol, nutritional, and hormonal factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:514–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee KW, Kuo WR, Tsai SM, Wang WM, Fang FM, Chiang FY, . Different impact from betel quid, alcohol and cigarette: Risk factors for pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005;117:831–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menvielle G, Luce D, Goldberg P, Bugel I, Leclerc A. Smoking, alcohol drinking and cancer risk for various sites of the larynx and hypopharynx. A case-control study in France. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004;13:165–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsch-Filho V. The epidemiology of laryngeal cancer in Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122:188–94.
   Google Scholar
• Damborenea Tajada J, Fernández Liesa R, Llorente Arenas E, Naya Gálvez MJ, Marín Garrido C, Rueda Gormedino P, . [The effect of tobacco consumption on acoustic voice analysis]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1999; 50:448–52. Spanish.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomgren M, Chen Y, Ng ML, Gilbert HR. Acoustic, aerodynamic, physiologic, and perceptual properties of modal and vocal fry registers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:2649–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikoff RF. Vocal stability and vocal tract configuration: An acoustic and electroglottographic investigation. J Voice. 1995; 9:173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Robb MP, Gilbert, HR. Electroglottographic evaluation of gender and vowel effects during modal and vocal fry phonation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:821–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins MB, Saxman JH. Inverse-filtered air flow and EGG measures for sustained vowels and syllables. J Voice. 1993;7: 47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasek K. An attempt to classify Lx signals. In: Pardo JM, Enriquez E, Ortega J, Ferreiros J, Macias J, Valverde FJ (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. Madrid, Spain; September 18–21, 1995. p. 1729–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mooshammer C. An EGG study on global and local vocal effort changes in German: Preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Voice Physiology and biomechanics. Marseille, France; August 18029, 2004 [about 4 p.]. Accessed on August 27, 2011 at http://icv2004.free.fr/preliminary.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins MB, Schulte L. Gender differences in vocal fold contact computed from electroglottographic signals: The influence of measurement criteria. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 111:1865–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard DM. Electroglottography/electrolaryngography In: Fried MP, Ferlito A, editors. The larynx. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Press; 2009. p. 227–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kania RE, Hans S, Hartl DM, Clement P, Crevier-Buchman L, Brasnu DF. Variability of electroglottographic glottal closed quotients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:349–52.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikoff RF. Assessment of the dynamics of vocal fold contact from the electroglottogram: Data from normal male subjects. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:1066–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smitheran JR, Hixon TJ. A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production. J Speech Hear Disord. 1981;46:138–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassich CJ, Ludlow CL. The use of perceptual methods by new clinicians for assessing voice quality. J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;51:125–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eadie TL, Doyle PC. Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. J Voice. 2005; 19:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham-Rowan MM, Laures-Gore J. Acoustic-perceptual correlates of voice quality in elderly men and women. J Commun Disord. 2006;39:171–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen VM, Højslet PE, Karlsmose M. Surgical treatment of Reinke's oedema (long-term results). J Laryngol Otol. 1986;100:187–90.
   Google Scholar
• Titze IR. A model for neurologic sources of aperiodicity in vocal fold vibration. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;43:460–72.
   Google Scholar
• Oguz H, Tarhan E, Korkmaz M, Yilmaz U, Safak MA, Demirci M, . Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. J Voice. 2007;21:203–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrand CT. Speech science: An integrated approach to theory and clinical practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cai Q, Tao Z, Yang Q. Vowel selection effects on the parameters of acoustic analysis [Abstract]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2001;15:167–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfer MP. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:1189–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brockmann M, Storck C, Carding PN, Drinnan MJ. Voice loudness and gender effects on jitter and shimmer in healthy adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:1152–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin BJ. Frequency variability in the aged voice. J Gerontol. 1981;36:722–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown WS, Morris RJ, Hollien F, Howell E. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics as a function of age and professional singing. J Voice. 1991;5:310–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WS, Morris RJ, Michel JF. Vocal jitter in young adult and aged female voices. J Voice. 1989;3:113–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrand CT. Harmonics-to-noise ratio: An index of vocal aging. J Voice. 2002;16:480–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell A, Penny L, Pemberton C. Speaking fundamental frequency changes over time in women: A longitudinal study. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:101–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saxman JH, Burk KW. Speaking fundamental frequency of middle-aged females. Folia Phoniatr. 1967;19:167–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pinto O, Hollien H. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of Australian women: Then and now. J Phon. 1982;10:367–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linville SE. Acoustic aspects of aging voice. In: Linville SE, editor. Vocal aging. San Diego: Singular Thomson Learning; 2001. p. 169–88.
   Google Scholar
• Stoicheff ML. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of nonsmoking female adults. J Speech Hear Res. 1981;24:437–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torre P 3rd, Barlow JA. Age-related changes in acoustic characteristics of adult speech. J Commun Disord. 2009;42: 324–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes-Laureano J, Sá MFS, Ferriani RA, Reis RM, Aguiar-Ricz LN, Valera FCP, . Comparison of fundamental frequency between menopausal women and women at menacme. Maturitas. 2006;55:195–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurer EM, Wender MCO, von Eye Corleta H, Capp E. Phono-articulatory variations of women in reproductive age and postmenopausal. J Voice. 2004;18:369–74.
   Google Scholar
• Awan SN. The aging female voice: Acoustic and respiratory data. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20:171–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36:21–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones K, Sigmon J, Hock L, Nelson E, Sullivan M, Ogren F. Prevalence and risk factors for voice problems among telemarketers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128: 571–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Parsa RA, Gray SD, Smith EM. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;47:281–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Lee YS, Jeong SW, Lee SH, Tae K. Change of acoustic parameters before and after treatment in laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:938–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pribuisiene R, Uloza V, Kupcinskas L, Jonaitis L. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients. J Voice. 2006;20:128–36.
   Google Scholar
• Selby JC, Gilbert HR, Lerman JW. Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux pre- and post-treatment. J Voice. 2003;17:557–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar