References
- Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001; 258:77–82.
- Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Wien: Springer Verlag; 1981.
- Cantarella G, Baracca G, Pignataro L, Forti S. Assessment of dysphonia due to benign vocal fold lesions by acoustic and aerodynamic indices: a multivariate analysis. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2011;36:21–7.
- Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier L, Millet B. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1998;119:247–8.
- Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1996;117:219–24.
- Laver J. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
- Vaissière J. Phonological use of the larynx. In: Giovanni A, Teston B, editors. Proceedings Larynx 97 ESCA Editions; 1997. p. 115–26.
- Ní Chasaide A, Gobl A. Voice source variation. In: Hardcastle WJ, Laver J, editors. The handbook of phonetic sciences. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999. p. 378–423.
- Ladefoged P, Maddieson I. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford Cambridge; 1996. p. 125–31
- Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Khan SD. Effects of native language on perception of voice quality. J Phon. 2010;38:588–93.
- Belotel-Grenié A, Grenié M. Types de phonation et tons en chinois standard. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale. 1997;26:249–79.
- D’Alessandro C. Voice source parameters and prosodic analysis. In: Sudhoff S, editor. Methods in empirical prosody research. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin; 2006. p. 68–88.
- Yanushevskaya I, Ní Chasaide A, Gobl C. Cross-language study of vocal correlates of affective states. In: Hess W, editor. Proceedings of Interspeech 2008, ISCA Eds; 2008. p. 330–3.
- Wagner A, Braun A. Is voice quality language dependant? In: Romero J, editor. Proceedings of ICPhS 2003, ICPhS Organizing Committee Eds; 2003. p. 651–4.
- Anders LC, Hollien H, Hurme P, Sonninen A, Wendler J. Perception of hoarseness by several classes of listeners. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1988;40:91–100.
- Yamaguchi H, Shrivastav R, Andrews ML, Niimi S. A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003;55:147–57.
- Yiu EM, Murdoch B, Hird K, Lau P, Ho EM. Cultural and language differences in voice quality perception: a preliminary investigation using synthesised signals. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:107–19.
- Ghio A, Pouchoulin G, Teston B, Pinto, Fredouille C, De Looze C, et al. How to manage sound, physiological and clinical data of 2500 dysphonic and dysarthric speakers? Speech Commun. 2012;54;664–79.
- André C, Ghio A, Cavé C, Teston B. PERCEVAL: a computer- driven system for experimentation on auditory and visual perception. In: Romero J, editor.Proceedings of ICPhS 2003, ICPhS Organizing Committee Eds; 2003. p. 1421–4.
- Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res. 1993; 36:21–40.
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.