Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders

References

• Baker J, Ben-Tovim DI, Butcher A, Esterman A, McLaughlin K. Development of a modified diagnostic classification system for voice disorders with inter-rater reliability study. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007;32:99–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258:77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carding P. Evaluating voice therapy: measuring the effectiveness of treatment. London: Whurr Publishers; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Oates J. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61:49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SM, Carding PN, Drinnan MJ. Exploring the relationship between severity of dysphonia and voice-related quality of life. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31:411–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carding PN, Wilson JA, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. Measuring voice outcomes: state of the science review. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:823–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A. Therapy outcome measures in speech and language therapy: comparing performance between different providers. Int J Lang Comm Dis. 1999;34:417–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman A. Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients. J Voice. 2005;19:454–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Wynne DM, Kubba H, McCartney E. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 1: evaluating vocal function. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2012;37:33–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Wardrop A, Wynne DM, Kubba H, McCartney E. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 2: subjective measurement of symptoms of voice disorder. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2012;37:39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1990;33:103–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Baylor CR. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgements of dysphonic voice. J Voice. 2006;20:527–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Nicolici C, Baylor C, Almand K, Waugh P, Maronian N. Effect of experience on judgements of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116:695–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Kapsner M, Rosenzweig J, Waugh P, Hillel A, Merati A. The role of experience in judgements of dysphonia. J Voice. 2010;24:564–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Kapsner-Smith M. The effect of listener experience and anchors on judgements of dysphonia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54:430–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkmeier JM, Case JL, Ludlow CL. Identification of symptoms for spasmodic dysphonia: a comparison of expert and nonexpert judges. J Comm Dis. 2001;34:31–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helou LB, Solomon NP, Henry LR, Coppit GL, Howard RS, Stojadinovic A. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;19:248–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawka T, Konerding U. The interrater reliability of stroboscopy evaluations. J Voice. 2012;26:812.e1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Poburka BJ, Bless DM. A multi-media, computer-based method for stroboscopy rating training. J Voice. 1998;4:513–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston RG, Umberger FG. The Voice Index: an objective performance-based assessment. East Moline, Illinois: LinguiSystems; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobsen G, Benninger MS, et al. The Voice Handicap Index: development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6:66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson L, Hirani SP, Epstein R, Baken RJ, Wood G, Rubin JS. Laryngeal manual therapy: a preliminary study to examine its treatment effects in the management of muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2009;23:353–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel FC, Boone DR. The S/Z ratio as an indicator of laryngeal pathology. J Speech Lang Hear Dis. 1981;46:147–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Bogaardt HCA, Passos VL, Roodenburg NPHD, Zumach A, Heijnen MAM, et al. Maximum phonation time: variability and reliability. J Voice. 2010;24:281–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamauchi EJ, Imaizumi S, Maruyama H, Haji T. Perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: a comparative analysis between the RASATI and GRBASI scales. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2010;35:121–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchner LN, Brehm SB, Weinrich B, Middendorf J, deAlarcon A, Levin L, et al. Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice. J Voice. 2010;24:441–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu EML, Chan KMK, Mok RSM. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21:129–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnell MP, Melton SD, Childes JM, Coleman TC, Dailey SA, Hoffman HT. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice. 2007;21:576–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abberton DE. Phonetic considerations in the design of voice assessment material. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2005;30:175–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dromey C, Nissen SL, Roy N, Merrill RM. Articulatory changes following treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: preliminary acoustic evidence. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:196–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie AI, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rubinstein EN, Abbott KV. Aerodynamic profiles of women with muscle tension dysphonia/aphonia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:481–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadi F, Salehi A. Comparison between palpatory findings of the hyoid position and their acoustic, videostroboscopic, and perceptual attributes in patients with muscle tension dysphonia (with and without organic lesions). J Voice. 2013;27:78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson Arboleda BM, Frederick AL. Considerations for maintenance of postural alignment for voice production. J Voice. 2008;22:90–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno E, De Padova A, Napolitano B, Marroni P, Batelli R, Ottaviani F, et al. Voice disorders and posturography: variables to define the success of rehabilitative treatment. J Voice. 2009;23:71–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CJ, Belafsky PC. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10:245–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, Claeys S. Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a review of the current knowledge. J Voice. 2011;25:202–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer A. Disorders of resonance and airflow secondary to cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction. Semin Speech Lang. 2011;32:141–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmqvist S, Santtila P, Lindström E, Sala E, Simberg S. The association between possible stress markers and vocal symptoms. J Voice. 2013;27:787.e1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker J, Ben-Tovim D, Butcher A, Esterman A, McLaughlin K. Psychosocial risk factors which may differentiate between women with functional voice disorder, organic voice disorder and a control group. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15:547–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker J. The role of psychogenic and psychosocial factors in the development of functional voice disorders. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10:210–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher P, Elias A, Cavailli L. Understanding and treating psychogenic voice disorder: a CBT framework. Bognor Regis, West Sussex: Wiley & Sons; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman J. Principles and techniques of manual therapy: application in the management of dysphonia. In: Harris T, Harris S, Rubin J, Howard D, editors. Voice clinic hand book. London: Whurr Publishers; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson A. Clinical voice disorders: an interdisciplinary approach. 3rd ed. New York: Thieme Stratton; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Roy N, Leeper HA. Effects of the manual laryngeal musculoskeletal tension reduction technique as a treatment for functional voice disorders: perceptual and acoustic features. J Voice. 1993;7:242–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene M, Mathieson L. The voice and its disorders. London: Whurr Publishers; 1991.
   Google Scholar