Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 16, 2013 - Issue 1
397
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Decision making about frozen supernumerary human embryos

Pages 31-34 | Received 14 Jun 2012, Accepted 24 Oct 2012, Published online: 01 Mar 2013

References

  • Blyth, E. (2012). Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: is there an emerging trend? Human Reproduction, 27, 2046–2057.
  • de Lacey, S. (2005). Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Human Reproduction, 20, 1661–1669.
  • de Lacey, S. (2007). Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: Fresh insights into patients’ thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Human Reproduction, 22, 1751–1758.
  • Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S., & Gillam, L. (2007). How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients’ views. Human Reproduction, 22, 3129–3138.
  • Goedeke, S. & Payne, D. (2009). Embryo donation in New Zealand: a pilot study. Human Reproduction, 1, 1–7.
  • Haimes, E. & Taylor, K. (2009). Fresh embryo donation for human stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors Human Reproduction, 24, 2142–2150.
  • Hammarberg, K. & Tinney, L. (2006). Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 86–91.
  • Lyerly, A., Nakagawa, S. & Kuppermann, M. (2011). Decisional conflict and the disposition of frozen embryos: implications for informed consentHuman Reproduction, 26, 646–654.
  • Lyerly, A., Steinhauser, K., Namey, E., Tulsky, J., Cook-Deegan, R., Sugarman, J., et al. (2006). Factors that affect infertility patients’ decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 1623–1630.
  • Lyerly, A., Steinhauser, K., Voils, C., Namey, E., Alexander, C., Bankowski, B., et al. (2008). Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertility & Sterility, 93, 499–509.
  • Machin, L. (2011). A hierarchy of needs? Embryo donation, in vitro fertilisation and the provision of infertility counselling. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 264–268.
  • McMahon, C., Gibson, F., Leslie, G., Saunders, D., Porter, K., & Tennant, C. (2003). Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. Human Reproduction, 18, 871–877.
  • McMahon, C., Gibson, F., & Cohen, J. (2000). Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks and embryo dilemmas after five years. Reproductive Technology, 10, 131–135.
  • Nachtigall, R., Becker, G., & Friese, C. (2005). Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility & Sterility, 84, 431–434.
  • Nachtigall, R., MacDougall, K., Harrington, J., Duff, J., Lee, M., & Becker, G. (2009). How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 92, 2094–2096.
  • Nachtigall, R., MacDougall, K., Lee, M., Harrington, J., & Becker, G. (2010). What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition. Fertility & Sterility, 94, 2069–2072.
  • Parry, S. (2006). (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2349–2359.
  • Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., & Dhont, M. (2012a). “Something of the two of us”. The emotionally loaded embryo disposition decision making of patients who view their embryo as a symbol of their relationship. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 33, 45–52.
  • Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Van de Velde, A., De Lissnyder, E., & Dhont, M. (2009). Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Human Reproduction, 24, 896–905.
  • Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Van de Velde, A., & Dhont, M. (2010). Patients conceptualization of cryopreserved embryo used in their fertility treatment. Human Reproduction, 25, 705–713.
  • Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Van de Velde, A., & Dhont, M. (2011). To continue or discontinue storage of cryopreserved embryos? Patients’ decisions in view of their child wish. Human Reproduction, 26, 861–872.
  • Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Van de Velde, A., & Dhont, M. (2012b). Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients’ responses to a 15-year mailing program. Human Reproduction, 27, 506–514.
  • Stiel, M., McMahon, C., Elwyn, G., & Boivin, J. (2010). Pre-birth characteristics and 5-year follow-up of women with cryopreserved embryos after successful in vitro fertilisation treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 31, 32–39.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.