Anonymous or known donors? A brief discussion of the psychosocial issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors

References

• Bellis, M., Hughes, K., Hughes, S., & Ashton, J. (2005). Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59, 749–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, D., Jennings, P., & Kramer, W. (2011). Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Human Reproduction, 26, 2415–2424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewaeys, A., Golombok, S., Naaktgeboren, N., de Bruyn, J., & van Hall, E. (1997). Donor insemination: Dutch parents’ opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children. Human Reproduction, 12, 1591–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, J. & Reynolds, P. (2008). Thinking the right to genetic inheritance: Liberal Rights, Communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of DI children. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 281–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burr, J. (2009). Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as ‘abjection’ in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemination. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 705–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R., Golombok, S., Bish, A., & Murray, C. (1995). Keeping secrets: a study of parental attitudes toward telling about donor insemination. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64, 549–559.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K.R., Grace, V.M., & Gillett, W.R. (2011). Factors associated with parents’ decisions to tell their adult offspring about the offspring's donor conception. Human Reproduction, 26, 2783–2790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K.R, Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25, 670–677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction, 24, 505–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Murray, C., Jadva, V., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F., & Rust, J. (2006). Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3. Human Reproduction, 21, 1918–1924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Owen, L., Blacke, L., Murray, C., & Jadva, V. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: Comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction, 24, 63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Mellish, L., Marks, A., & Jadva, V. (2011). Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, K. (2006). Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 261–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Lampic, C. (2012). Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow up at age 1–4 years. Human Reproduction, 27, 2998–3007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2011). Sperm and oocyte donor's experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 26, 638–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction, 24, 1909–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (2003). Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 2229–2242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalos, A., Gottlieb, C., & Lalos, O. (2007). Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinking. Human Reproduction, 22, 1759–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb-Lundberg, S., Kjellberg, S., & Sydsjo, G. (2006). Helping parents to tell their children about the use of donor insemination (DI) and determining their opinions about open-identity sperm donors. Acta Obstetetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85, 
78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, E., Daniels, K., Curson, R., & Golombok, S. (2005). School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patterns. Human Reproduction, 20, 810–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehab, D., Duff, J., Pasch, L.A., MacDougall, K., Scheib, J.E., & Nachtigall, R.D. (2008). How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjö, G., Lampic, C., Brändström, S., Gudmundsson, J., Karlström, P.O., Solensten, N.G., et al. (2012). Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 119, 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A.J. & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counseling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D’Hooghe, T. (2013). A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar