Counselling impact of three-dimensional imaging in perinatal consultation

References

• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;847:185–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethical implica- tions for early pregnancy of the fetus as patient: a basic ethical concept in fetal medicine. Early Preg- nancy 1995;1:253–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethics in fetal medicine. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1999;13:491–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. An ethically justi- fied, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:311–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinnato JA, Cook VD, Cook CR, et al. Aggressive intrapartum management of lethal fetal anomalies: beyond fetal beneficence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:89–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba K, Okai T, Satoh K. Development of scan head position indicator for ultrasonic fetal 3D reconstruc- tion. Jpn J Med Ultrasonics 1986;31(Suppl 1):121–2
   Google Scholar
• Baba K, Satoh K, Sakamoto S. Development of a system for ultrasonic 3D reconstruction of the fetus. J Perinat Med 1987;15(Suppl 1):48
   Google Scholar
• Baba K, Okai T, Kozuma S, et al. Real-time process- able three-dimensional US in obstetrics. Radiology 1997;203:571–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba K, Satoh K. Development of the system for ultrasonic fetal 3D reconstruction. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 1986;38:1385
   Google Scholar
• Jackson DN, Brown L, Hough M, et al. Medical effi- cacy of 3-dimensional imaging. Presented at the International Congress of Ultrasound, Edinburgh, Scotland (Hohler Investigator Award), November 1998
   Google Scholar
• Jackson DN. Efficacy of “Routine” three dimen- sional imaging in patients with abnormal 2D perinatal scans. Presented at the 9th World Congress of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Jackson DN, Brown L, Keel-Thompson K. Compari- son of rapid MRI (HASTE) procedure to volume mode planar imaging in the management of fetal abnormalities. J Med Ultrasonics 2000;27:
   Google Scholar
• Jackson DN, Brown L, Keel-Thompson K. Volume mode planar imaging in patients with non-surface fetal abnormalities: techniques and efficacy. J Med Ultrasonics 2000;27:
   Google Scholar
• Jackson DN, Aptekar LH, Keel-Thompson K. Tech- nique of “3-D” volume mode sectional planar imag- ing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16(Suppl):26
   Google Scholar
• Andrist LA, Katz VL, Elijah R, et al. Developing a plan for routine 3D surface rendering in obstetrics. JDMS 2001;17:16–21
   Google Scholar
• Andrist LA, Katz VL, Elijah R, et al. Visualization of fetal anomalies with surface 3-dimensional ultra- sound: a case study. JDMS 2001;17:88–93
   Google Scholar
• Baba K, Okai T, Ishii S, et al. Ultrasonic 3D imaging: applications to fetuses, placental blood flow and breast tumors. Innervision 1992;7:73–9
   Google Scholar
• Platt LD. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology: preliminary experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1199–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. Fetal face visualization using three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultra- sound Med 1995;14:349–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. Prenatal visualization of cranial sutures and fontanelles with three- dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:871–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. 3-Dimensional ultra- sound in gynecology and obstetrics: a review. Ultra- sound Q 1998;14:218–33
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Richards RD, Budorick NE, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Radiology 1997;205(Suppl):245
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, House M, Nelson TR, et al. Evalua- tion of normal and abnormal lips in fetuses: com- parison between three- and two-dimensional sonongraphy. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1233–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Johnson DD, Budorick NE, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetal lip and palate. Radiology 1997;205(Suppl):245
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR, Jaffe JS. 3D US of the fetus. Radiology 1990;177:194
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. 3D ultrasound imaging in patient diagnosis and management: the future [Opinion]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991;1:381–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH, Nelson TR, Baergen RN, et al. Imaging of placental vasculature using three- dimensional ultrasound and color power Doppler: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12:45–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S. Septate uterus: detection and prediction of obstetrical complications by different forms of ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:631–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S. Volume and vascularity of the yolk sac studied by three-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler. J Perinat Med 1999;27:91–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Hafner T, Kos M, et al. Three-dimensional sonography in prenatal diagnosis: a luxury or a necessity? J Perinat Med 2000;28:194–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull AD. Fetal face: what we can see using 2-D and 3-D ultrasound imaging. Semin Roentgenol 1998;33:369–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull AD. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and diagnosis of placenta percreta with bladder involve- ment. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:853–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE. Three- dimensional ultrasound of conjoined twins. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:701–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Riccabona M, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetal spine. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:434–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz E. Three-dimensional ultrasound – a require- ment for prenatal diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:225–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G, et al. 3D ultrasono- graphy in prenatal diagnosis. J Perinat Med 1995; 23:213–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G, et al. Volume 3D scan- ning – a new dimension in the evaluation of fetal malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3(Suppl 2):131
   Google Scholar
• Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G. Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimen- sion in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:222–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz E, Macchiella D, Bahlmann F, et al. 3D ultra- sound for the diagnosis of fetal malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:137
   Google Scholar
• Merz E, Weber G, Bahlmann F, et al. Application of transvaginal and abdominal three-dimensional ultrasound for the detection or exclusion of malfor- mations of the fetal face. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:237–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz E, Weber G, Bahlmann F, et al. 3-D ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 1995;35(Suppl 1):118–121
   Google Scholar
• Merz E. [Current technical possibilities of 3D ultra- sound in gynecology and obstetrics]. Ultraschall Med 1997;18:190–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merz E. Update technical application of 3D sono- graphy in gynaecology and obstetrics. Ultraschall Med 1997;18:189
   Google Scholar
• Merz E. Volume (3D) scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4(Suppl 1):339
   Google Scholar
• Meinel K. Transparent 3-D ultrasound in fetal abnormalities. Ultraschall Med 1998;19:120–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller GH, Weiner CP, Yankowitz J. Three- head and spine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:372–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH, Berg S. Three-dimensional fetal ultrasound. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000;14:611–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X. Uses of three-dimensional ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih 1997;77:73–4
   Google Scholar
• Ludomirski A, Khandelwal M, Uerpairojkit B, et al. 3D ultrasound evaluation of fetal facial and spinal anatomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174(Suppl):318
   Google Scholar
• Ludomirski A, Uerpairojkit B, Whiteman VE, et al. New technology in 3D obstetrical ultrasonography: technique, advantages and limitations. Am Obstet Gynecol 1996;174(Suppl):318
   Google Scholar
• Riccabona M, Johnson D, Pretorius DH, et al. 3D ultrasound: display modalities in the fetal spine and thorax. Eur J Radiol 1995;22:141–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner H, Spitzer D, Weiss-Wichert PH, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:373–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner H. Potential 3-D (3D) ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Gynakologe 1995; 28:315–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benoit B. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of congenital ichthyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:380
   Google Scholar
• Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. ‘Voluvision’: 3D ultrasonography of fetal malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1312–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek F, et al. Application of transvaginal and abdominal 3D ultrasound for the detection or exclusion of fetal malformations of the fetal face. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:2373
   Google Scholar
• Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. 3D ultrasound: abnormalities of the fetal face in surface and volume rendering mode. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:302–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaas HG. Alobar holoprosencephaly at 9 weeks gestational age visualized by two- and three- dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:62–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaas HS, Eik-Nes SH, Berg S, et al. In vivo three- dimensional ultrasound reconstructions of embryos and early fetuses. Lancet 1998;353:1182–6
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F, Pellicer A, Raga F, et al. Review: 3D ultrasound in reproduction, obstetrics and gyne- cology. J Assoc Reprod Rev 1995;5:170–88
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne N, et al. 3D evaluation of embryonic and fetal malformations: comparison with 2D ultrasound. In Kurjak A, ed. Textbook of Perinatal Medicine. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 1998:240–62
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG, et al. Use of three-dimensional ultrasonography for the study of normal and pathologic morphology of the human embryo and fetus: preliminary report. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:757–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Villalobos A, et al. First- trimester neck abnormalities: three-dimensional evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:419–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F. Early diagnosis of conjoined twins using two-dimensional color Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound. J Natl Med Assoc 1998;90:552–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F. Three-dimensional visualization of the human embryo: a potential revolution in pre- natal diagnosis [Editorial]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:393–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F. Tratado de Endosonografia en Obstetricia y Ginecologia. Barcelona: Masson-Salvat, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Budorick NE. Three-dimensional ultrasound exami- nation of the fetal hands: normal and abnormal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:227–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, Tartar MK, et al. 3-Dimensional US of the fetal ankle. Radiology 1995; 197:197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, Tartar MK, et al. Three-dimensional US of the fetal hands: normal and abnormal findings. Radiology 1996;201:160
   Google Scholar
• Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, Johnson DD, et al. 3-D ultrasonography of the fetal distal lower extremity: normal and abnormal. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17:649–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S. The potential diagnostic capabilities of three-dimensional surface rendering. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:L148
   Google Scholar
• Chung BL. The application of three-dimensional ultrasound to nuchal translucency measurement in early pregnancy (10–14 weeks): a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:122–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman B, Hubbard AM, Jackson GM, et al. Three-dimensional power Doppler of fetal chest masses. J Ultrasound Med 1998
   Google Scholar
• Merz E. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal ambiguous gender using three-dimensional sonography [Letter]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:217–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devonald K, Ellwood DA, Griffiths KA, et al. Volume imaging: three-dimensional appreciation of the fetal head and face. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:919–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garjian KV. Fetal skeletal dysplasia: 3-D US – initial experience. Radiology 2000;214:717–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo HC, Chang FM, Wu CH, et al. The primary application of 3D ultrasonography in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;166:880–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner E. Prenatal diagnosis of unilateral megal- encephaly by 2D and 3D ultrasound: a case report. Prenat Diagn 1999;19:159–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Aoki S, Akiyama M, et al. 3-D ultrasono- graphic assessment of fetal hands and feet. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:235–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Aoki S, Hata K, et al. 3-D ultrasonographic assessments of fetal development. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:218–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Yanagihara T, Matsumoto M, et al. 3-D sonographic features of hydrops fetalis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;48:172–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Yonehara T, Aoki S, et al. 3-D sonographic visualization of the fetal face. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:481–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang RI, Huang SE, Chang FM. Prenatal diagnosis of extopia cordis at 10 weeks of gestation using 2D and 3D ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:137–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HH, Liang RI, Chang FM, et al. Prenatal diagno- sis of otocephaly using 2-D and 3-D ultrasono- graphy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:361–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe A. 3-D sonographic visualization of fetal facial anomaly. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:917–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar;26:210–14
   Google Scholar
• Matsumi H, Kozuma S, Baba K, et al. Three- dimensional ultrasound is useful in diagnosing the fetus with abdominal wall defect. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:356–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maymon R, Halperin R, Weintraub Z, et al. 3-D transvaginal sonography of conjoined twins at 10 weeks: a case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11:292–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maymon R, Herman A, Ariely S, et al. Three- dimensional vaginal sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology. Hum Reprod Update 2000;6:475–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooh RK. Fetal craniofacial structure and intra- cranial morphology in a case of Apert syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:274–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Chang FM, Chang CH, et al. Prenatal diag- nosis of Joubert syndrome complicated with encephaloceles using two-dimensional and three- dimensional ultrasound [Letter]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:360–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempen A. The shape of the endometrium evalu- ated with 3-D ultrasound: an additional predictor of extrauterine pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998:13:450–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih JC. Antenatal depiction of the fetal ear with three-dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:500–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih JC. Application of the surface rendering technique of three-dimensional ultrasound in pre- natal diagnosis and counseling of Klippel– Trenaunay–Weber syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:298–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih JC. Arteriovenous malformation of meso- salpinx associated with a ‘vanishing’ ectopic preg- nancy: diagnosis with three-dimensional color power angiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13:63–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner H, Staudach A, Spitzer D, et al. Three dimen- sional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: technique, possibilities, and limitations. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1773–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai TH. Prenatal diagnosis of alobar holopros- encephaly by two-dimensional and three- dimensional ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:400–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg BB. Obstetric US imaging: the past 40 years. Radiology 2000;215:622–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg A, Steiner H, Bogner G, et al. The gestational sac and 3D volumetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:348
   Google Scholar
• Hafner E, Philipp T, Schuchter K, et al. Second- trimester measurements of placenta volume by 3-D ultrasound to predict small-for-gestational-age infants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Aoki S, Hata K, et al. 3-D ultrasonographic assessment of the umbilical cord during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998;45:159–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Aoki S, Manabe A, et al. 3D ultrasonography in the first trimester of human pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1800–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Aoki S, Miyazaki K, et al. 3-D ultrasono- graphic visualization of multiple pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998;46:26–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Aoki S, Manabe A, et al. Visualization of fetal genitalia by three-dimensional ultrasono- graphy in the second and third trimesters. J Ultra- sound Med 1998;17:137–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Manabe A, Aoki S, et al. Three-dimensional intrauterine sonography in the early first-trimester of human pregnancy: preliminary study. Hum Reprod 1998;13:740–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Yanagihara T, Hayashi K, et al. Three- dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian tumours: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:858–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoesli IM. 3-D volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D- sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:115–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candiani F. The latest in ultrasound: three- dimensional imaging. Part 1. Eur J Radiol 1998;27 (Suppl 2):S179–82
   Google Scholar
• Achiron R. The art of ultrasound in obstetrics: from abstraction to hyper-realism [Editorial]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:1–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, et al. Three- dimensional imaging of the brain-cavities in human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:228–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkley JF, McCallum WD, Muramasu SK, et al. Fetal weight estimation from ultrasonic three- dimensional head and trunk reconstructions: evalu- ation in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:715–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkley JF, McCallum WD, Muramatsu SK, et al. Fetal weight estimation from lengths and volumes found by three-dimensional ultrasonic measure- ments. J Ultrasound Med 1984;3:163–1698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesarani F. [Tridimensional ultrasonography. First clinical experience with dedicated devices and review of the literature]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1999;97:256–64
   Google Scholar
• Chang CH. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of fetal cerebellar transverse and anterior–posterior diameters. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26:175–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FM, Hsu KF, Ko HC, et al. 3-D ultrasound assessment of fetal liver volume in normal preg- nancy: a comparison of reproducibility with 2-D ultrasound and a search for a volume constant. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:381–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FM, Hsu KF, Ko HC, et al. Fetal heart volume assessment by 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:42–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FM, Liang RI, Ko HC, et al. 3D ultrasound assessed fetal thigh volumetry in predicting birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:331–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy TJ, Hughes SW, Chiu WSC, et al. Estimation of fetal lung volume using enhanced 3D ultrasound: a new method and first results. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:1015–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiba Y, Hayashi K, Yamazaki S, et al. New tech- niques of ultrasound, thick slicing 3D imaging and the clinical aspects in the perinatal field. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4(Suppl 1):195
   Google Scholar
• Kampmann W. 3-D sonographic volume measure- ment of the cerebral ventricular system: in vitro vali- dation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:1169–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly IG, Gardener JE, Brett AD, et al. Three- dimensional ultrasound of the fetus. Radiology 1994; 192:253–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly IMG, Gardener JE, Lees WR. 3D fetal ultra- sound. Lancet 1991;339:1062–4
   Google Scholar
• Khandelwal M. Three-dimensional ultrasono- graphic technology to assess and compare echo- density of fetal bowel, bone, and liver in the second trimester of pregnancy [published erratum appears in J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:734]. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:691–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossof G, Griffiths KA, Warren PS, et al. 3D volume imaging in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4(Suppl 1):196
   Google Scholar
• Kozuma S, Baba K, Okai T, et al. Dynamic observa- tion of the fetal face by three-dimensional ultra- sound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:283–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolz M. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: assessment with color Doppler angiography and three- dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:303–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre R, Nisand K, Bettahar K, et al. Measurement of limb circumference with 3D ultrasound for fetal weight estimation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3:176–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feichtinger W. Transvaginal three-dimensional imaging [Editorial]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3:375–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feichtinger W. Follicle aspiration with interactive three-dimensional digital imaging (Voluson): a step toward real-time puncturing under three- dimensional ultrasound control. Fertil Steril 1998; 70:374–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Banovic I, et al. The study of morphology and circulation of early embryo by 3-D ultrasound and power Doppler. J Perinat Med 1999; 27:145–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A. The assessment of ovarian tumor angio- genesis: what does three-dimensional power Doppler add? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:136–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A. Three dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler in assessment of uterine and ovarian angiogenesis: a prospective study. Croat Med J 1999;40:413–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultra- sound improves measurement of nuchal trans- lucency. J Perinat Med 1999;27:97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Gynecol Oncol 2000;76:28–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudy JA. Fetal liver volume measurement by three-dimensional ultrasonography: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:93–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudy JA. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of normal fetal lung volume: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:13–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence A. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagno- sis of interstitial pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:292–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Kratochwil A, Stumpflen I, et al. Fetal lung volume determination by 3D ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:588–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Comstock CH, Kirk JS, et al. Birth weight pre- dictions by three-dimensional ultrasonographic volumes of the fetal thighs and abdomen. J Ultra- sound Med 1997;161:799–805
   Google Scholar
• Lees WA. 3D ultrasound images optimize fetal review. Diagn Imaging 1992;14:69–73
   Google Scholar
• Lees WR, Gardener JE, Gillams A. Three- dimensional ultrasound of the fetus. Radiology 1991;181(Suppl):132
   Google Scholar
• Levaillant JM, Rotten D, Bilon C, et al. 3D ultra- sound imaging of the female breast and human fetus in utero. Preliminary results. Ultrasound Imaging 1989;11:149–50
   Google Scholar
• Levental M, Pretorius DH, Sklansky MS, et al. 3-D ultrasonography of normal fetal heart: comparison with 2-D imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:341–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang RI, Chang FM, Yao BL, et al. Predicting birth weight by fetal upper arm volume using 3D ultra- sound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:632–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babsinki A, Mukherjee T, Kereny T, et al. Diagnosing amnionicity at 6 weeks of pregnancy with transvaginal 3-D ultrasonography: case report. Fertil Steril 1998;71:1161–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay MB. Forty years of obstetric ultrasound 1957–1997: from A-scope to three dimensions. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:3–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagata S, Koyanagi T, Fukushima S, et al. Change in the 3D shape of the stomach in the developing human fetus. Early Hum Dev 1994;37:27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor CS. The role of 3-D ultrasonography in evaluating the developing fetus. MD Comput 1999;16:46–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. Visualization of the fetal thoracic skeleton with three-dimensional sono- graphy: a preliminary report. Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1485–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. 3-Dimensional ultra- sound of the fetal surface features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:166–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Hagan-Ansert S. Fetal heart assessment using 3D ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14(Suppl): S30
   Google Scholar
• Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Sklansky M, et al. 3D echocardiographic evaluation of fetal heart anatomy and function: acquisition, analysis and display. J Ultrasound Med 1995;15:1–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockenga J. 3D-ultrasound in imaging, diagnosis and follow-up of an atypical hydatid cyst. Z Gastro- enterol 1998;36:599–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal A. [Possibilities of the use of 3-dimensional ultra- sonography in gynecology and obstetrics]. Orv Hetil 1997;138:2599–602
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen MH, Larsen T. Three-dimensional ultra- sonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Ugeskr Laeger 2001;163:594–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellicer A. Evaluation of the ovarian reserve in young low responders with normal basal levels of follicle- stimulating hormone using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril 1998;70:671–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt LD. Report from the first Kenneth Gottesfeld– Charles Hohler Memorial Foundation conference on obstetric and gynecological ultrasound. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:356–61
   Google Scholar
• Plockinger-Ulm B, Ulm M, Lee A, et al. Antenatal depiction of fetal digits with 3D ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:571–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohls UG, Rempen A. Fetal lung volumetry by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:6–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooh RK, Pooh K. Transvaginal 3D and Doppler ultrasonography of the fetal brain. Semin Perinatol 2001;25:38–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccabona M, Pretorius DH, Nelson TR, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound: display modalities in obstetrics. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:157–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaaps JP. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gyneco- logy: 3D ultrasonography Rev Med Liege 1999; 54:401–8
   Google Scholar
• Schild RL, Indefrei D, Eschweiler S, et al. Three- dimensional endometrial volume calculation and pregnancy rate in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1255–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild RL. [Can 3D volumetric analysis of the fetal upper arm and thigh improve conventional 2D weight estimates?] Ultraschall Med 1999;20:31–7
   Google Scholar
• Schild RL. Fetal lumbar spine volumetry by three- dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:335–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivan E, Chan L, Uerpairojkit B, et al. Growth of the fetal forehead and normative dimensions developed by 3D ultrasonographic technology. J Ultrasound Med 1997;16:401–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklansky MS. Real-time three-dimensional fetal echocardiography: initial feasibility study. J Ultra- sound Med 1999;18:745–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sladkevicius P. Three-dimensional power Doppler imaging of the Fallopian tube. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:287
   Google Scholar
• Sohn C, Bastert G. 3D ultrasound in prenatal diag- nosis. Z Geburtsh Perinatol 1993;197:11–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohn C, Stolz W, Nuber B, et al. 3D ultrasound diag- nostics in gynaecology and obstetrics. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 1991;51:335–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner H, Gregg AR, Bogner G, et al. First trimester 3D ultrasound volumetry of the gestational sac. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3(Suppl 2):168
   Google Scholar
• Steiner H, Merz E, Staudach A. 3D fetal facing. Hum Reprod Update CD-ROM 1995;1: item6
   Google Scholar
• Steiner H, Staudach A, Spitzer D, et al. 3D- sonography provides new aspects in obstetrical and gynecological ultrasound. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 1993;53:779–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su YN. Cervical pregnancy: assessment with three- dimensional power Doppler imaging and successful management with selective uterine artery embo- lization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:284–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan SL. Clinical applications of Doppler and three- dimensional ultrasound in assisted reproductive technology [Editorial]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:153–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulandi T. Reproductive performance and three- dimensional ultrasound volume determination of polycystic ovaries following laparoscopic ovarian drilling. Int J Fertil Womens Med 1997;42:436–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulm MR, Kratochwil A, Ulm B, et al. 3-D ultrasound evaluation of fetal tooth germs. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:240–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wymersch D, Favre R, Gasser B. Use of 3-D ultrasound to establish the prenatal diagnosis of Fryns syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996;11:335–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallny TA. The fetal spinal canal – a three- dimensional study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:1329–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang PH. Obstetrical three-dimensional ultrasound in the visualization of the intracranial midline and corpus callosum of fetuses with cephalic position [Letter]. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:518–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkin KL, Khalife S, Nuwayhid B, et al. 3D recon- struction of freehand abdominal and vaginal ultrasonic images. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3 (Suppl 2):185
   Google Scholar
• Tymstra TJ, Bajema C, Beekhuis JR, et al. Women’s opinions on the offer and use of prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1991;11:893–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlow BJ. The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:929–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Economides DL. First trimester ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:53–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wald N. Routine ultrasound scanning for congenital abnormalities. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;847:173–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipale P. Ultrasonographic screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in early pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:563–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier B, Steiner H, Weinerroither H, et al. The psychological impact of three-dimensional fetal imaging on the fetomaternal relationship. In Baba K, Jurkovic D, eds. Three Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 1997:67–74
   Google Scholar
• Carroll JC, Brown JB, Reid AJ, et al. Women’s experi- ence of maternal serum screening. Can Fam Physician 2000;46:614–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DN, Wittmann BK, Hess M, et al. The psycho- logical impact of diagnostic ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:673–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelacci L, Fava GA, Grandi S, et al. Psychological reactions to ultrasound. Examination during preg- nancy. Psychother Psychosom 1988;50:1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detraux JJ, Gillot-de Vries F, Vanden Eynde S, et al. Psychological impact of the announcement of a fetal abnormality on pregnant women and on profes- sionals. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;847:210–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotgorski Z, Tadmor O, Duniec E, et al. Anxiety levels of pregnant women during ultrasound exami- nation: coping styles, amount of feedback and learned resourcefulness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:425–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Duniec E, et al. The effect of the amount of feedback on anxiety levels during ultrasound scanning. J Clin Ultrasound 1996;24:21–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley J. Through a glass darkly: ultrasound and prenatal bonding. Birth 1990;17:214–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filly RA. Obstetrical sonography: the best way to terrify a pregnant woman. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle M. Ultrasonic ‘soft markers’ of fetal chromosomal defects. Detecting them may do more harm than good. Br Med J 1997;314:918
   Google Scholar
• Madarikan BA, Tew B, Lari J. Maternal response to anomalies detected by antenatal ultrasonography. Br J Clin Pract 1990;44:587–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsoi MM, Hunter M, Pearce M, et al. Ultrasound scanning in women with raised serum alpha feto- protein: short term psychological effect. J Psychosom Res 1987;31:35–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson PJ, Steptoe A, Hall DM. Assessment of maternal anxiety following neonatal screening and investigation for occult spinal dysraphism. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:72–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp J, Davenport M, Pernet A. Antenatally diag- nosed surgical anomalies: the psychological effect of parental antenatal counseling. J Pediatr Sur 1998;33:1376–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgan HE, Furness ME, Foster BK. Prenatal ultra- sound diagnosis of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 19:11–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfild Z, Blumenfeld I, Bronshtein M. The early prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and the decision-making process. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:105–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holschneider AM, Baumgartner M, Mascott C. Consequences of antenatal diagnosis for pediatric surgery. Prog Pediatr Surg 1986;19:184–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutton KA, Spicer RD. Benefits and adverse effects of prenatal diagnosis in non-urological surgical dis- orders. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994;4:161–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MC. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate: experiences in Southern California. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:107–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes S, Demey A, Appelboom-Fondu J. Impact of ultrasound for facial cleft on mother–child relation- ships. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;847:249–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner R, Adzick NS. Perinatal management of fetal malformations amenable to surgical correction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1999;11:177–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone PR, France K, Dixon JW, et al. Not perfectly formed. NZ Med J 1996;109:284
   Google Scholar
• Shaaban AF, Kim HB, Milner R, et al. The role of ultrasonography in fetal surgery and invasive fetal procedures. Semin Roentgenol 1999;34:62–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skari H, Rognerud H, Haugen G, et al. Prenatal ultra- sound diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and meningomyelocele: a case report with literature review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:800–2
   Google Scholar
• Witters I, Fryns JP. Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: diagnostic possibili- ties and limitations of fetal neurosonography. Genet Couns 2000;11:3–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Dorsten JP, Hulsey TC, Newman RB, et al. Fetal anomaly detection by second-trimester ultrasono- graphy in a tertiary center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:742–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvesen KA, Oyen L, Schmidt N, et al. Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:80–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallaire L, Lortie G, Des Rochers M, et al. Parental reaction and adaptability to the prenatal diagnosis of fetal defect or genetic disease leading to preg- nancy interruption. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:249–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunfeld JA, Agterberg G, Wladimiroff JW, et al. Quality of life and anxiety in pregnancies after late pregnancy loss: a case–control study. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:783–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunfeld JA, Wladimiroff JW, Passchier J, et al. Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diag- nosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:603–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunfeld JA, Wladimiroff JW, Passchier J. The grief of late pregnancy loss. Patient Educ Couns 1997; 31:57–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, et al. Families look- ing back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med 2001;29:197–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwanani SG, Seagraves K, Dierker LJ, et al. Rela- tionship between prenatal anxiety and perinatal outcome in nulliparous women: a prospective study. J Natl Med Assoc 1997;89:93–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Sabroe S, et al. Psycho- logical distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. Br Med J 1993;307:234–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Sabroe S, et al. The relationship between psychological distress during pregnancy and birth weight for gestational age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:32–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira JM, Fisk NM, Glover V. Association between maternal anxiety in pregnancy and increased uterine artery resistance index: cohort based study. Br Med J 1999;318:153–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucciello ML. Pregnant adolescents’ perceptions of their babies before and after realtime ultrasound. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 1998;36:12–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Sjoden PO. Pregnancy, ultrasound screening and smoking attitudes. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;42:73–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius DH. Maternal smoking habit modification via fetal visualization. University of Calfornia Tobacco Related Disease Research Program. Annual Report to the California State Legislature. California: University of California, 1996:76
   Google Scholar
• Baillie C, Mason G, Hewison J. Scanning for pleasure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1223–4
   Google Scholar
• Kamel HS, Ahmed HN, Eissa MA, et al. Psycho- logical and obstetrical responses of mothers follow- ing antenatal fetal sex identification. J Obstet Res 1999;25:43–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice PL, Naksook C. Pregnancy and technology: Thai women’s perceptions and experience of pre- natal testing. Health Care Women Int 1999;20:259–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santalahti P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, et al. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screen- ing? Prenat Diagn 1998;18:153–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tautz S, Jahn A, Molokomme I, et al. Between fear and relief: how rural pregnant women experience foetal ultrasound in a Botswana district hospital. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:689–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett CC, Richards DS. Patient acceptance of endovaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:52–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogberg U, Larsson N. User charges for antenatal care and ultrasound – an unwillingness to pay. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:398–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Rabinovitz R, et al. Paren- tal attitudes toward obstetric ultrasound examina- tion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997;23:25–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayers S, Pickering AD. Psychological factors and ultrasound: differences between routine and high- risk scans. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:76–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorkhem G, Jorgensen C, Hanseus K. Parental reactions to fetal echocardiography. Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:87–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ. Prenatal ultrasound examinations: for whom, by whom, what, when and how many? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10:1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Reading AE, Cox DN, et al. Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: the short-term psycho- logical effects of early real-time scans. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1982;3:1–2
   Google Scholar
• Cardwell MS. Prenatal ultrasonographic screening does have a favorable impact on maternal manage- ment and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:579–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen M. A handful of questions. Supporting parental decision making. Clin Nurse Spec 2000;14:189–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clauson Ml. Uncertainty and stress in women hospitalized with high-risk pregnancy. Clin Nurs Res 1996;5:309–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeMier RL, Hynan MT, Harris HB, et al. Perinatal stressors as predictors of symptoms of post- traumatic stress in mothers of infants at high risk. J Perinatol 1996;16:276–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devore GR. The routine antenatal diagnostic imaging with ultrasound study (RADIUS): another perspective. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:622–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copel JA, Platt LD, Campbell S. Prenatal ultrasound screening and perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 1994;330:571
   Google Scholar
• Crane JP, LeFevre ML, Winborn RC, et al. A random- ized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management and outcome of anomalous fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:392–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean H. Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database. The Eurofetus Team. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;847:118–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean H. The performance of routine ultra- sonographic screening of pregnancies in the Euro- fetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:446–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean H. Detection of chromosomal abnormal- ities, an outcome of ultrasound screening. The Eurofetus Team. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;847:136–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefos T. Routine obstetrical ultrasound at 18–22 weeks: our experience on 7,236 fetuses. J Matern Fetal Med 1999;8:64–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Economides DL, Whitlow BJ, Braithwaite JM. Ultrasonography in the detection of fetal anomalies in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:516–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Economides DL. First trimester ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:53–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golde SH. Prenatal ultrasound screening and peri- natal outcome. N Engl J Med 1994;570:
   Google Scholar
• Gordon PA. Fetal medicine and ultrasonography. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:68–70 Downey DB, Fenster A. Three-dimensional ultra- sound: a maturing technology. Ultrasound Q 1998;14:25–40
   Google Scholar
• Esen UI, Olajide F. Expectations and fears of women regarding two methods of prenatal screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57:193–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Gallstedt-Fransson I, et al. Perception of information, expectations and experi- ences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:86–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, et al. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal out- come. 1993;329:821–7
   Google Scholar
• Field T, Sandberg D, Quetel TA, et al. Effects of ultra- sound feedback on pregnancy anxiety, fetal activity, and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:525–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Adzick NS. The current status and future potential of fetal inter- vention: image is everything. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1999;12:51–7
   Google Scholar
• Georges E. Fetal ultrasound imaging and the produc- tion of authoritative knowledge in Greece. Med Anthropol Q 1996;10:157–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JM. Prenatal screening and diagnosis: some psychological and social issues. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:1074–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groome LJ, Swiber MJ, Bentz LS, et al. Maternal anxiety during pregnancy: effect on fetal behavior at 38 to 40 weeks of gestation. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1995;16:391–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawataki M. Ethical issues and decision-making in fetal cardiology. Pediatr Int 1999;41:733–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konje JC, de Chazal R, Taylor DJ. Routine ultra- sound scanning in pregnancy. The benefits are clinical .. and psychological. Br Med J 1993;307:559
   Google Scholar
• Hughes PM, Turton P, Evans CD. Stillbirth as risk factor for depression and anxiety in the subsequent pregnancy: cohort study. Br Med J 1999;318:1721–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikcevic AV, Tunkel SA, Kuczmierczyk AR, et al. Investigation of the cause of miscarriage and its influence on women’s psychological distress. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:808–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nwanze HO, Sowemimo GO. Maternal stress, superstition and communicative behaviour with Nigerian cleft lip and palate children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1987;21:15–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Munk M, et al. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman’s background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:383–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layng J. Screening for nuchal translucency. Counseling should be considered an integral part of screening programmes. Br Med J 1998;317:749
   Google Scholar
• Mason G, Baillie C. Counseling should be provided before parents are told of presence of ultrasono- graphic ‘soft markers’ of fetal abnormality. Br Med J 1997;315:189–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver S, Rajan L, Turner H, et al. Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives, and ultrasonographers. Br Med J 1996;313:1251–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persutte WH, Drose J, Spitz JL, et al. Advanced- practice sonography in obstetrics and gynecology: a pilot study investigating the efficacy of the ultra- sound practitioner. J Allied Health 1999;28:71–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persutte WH. Failure to address the psychosocial benefit of prenatal sonography: another failing of the RADIUS Study. Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:795–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryde PG, Drugan A, Johnson MP, et al. Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:496–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryde PG, Isada NB, Hallak M, et al. Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non- aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:52–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodis JF, Vintzileos AM. A sound way to diagnose congenital anomalies. Contemp Pediatr 1991;8:77–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safran DG, Montgomery JE, Chang H, et al. Switching doctors: predictors of voluntary dis- enrollment from a primary physician’s practice. J Fam Pract 2001;50:130–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadyen A, Gledhill J, Whitlow B, et al. First trimester ultrasound screening carries ethical and psychological implications. Br Med J 1998;317:694–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson C. ‘Normal’ and ‘special’ aspects of preg- nancy. Obstet Gynecol 1973;41:611–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon D. 3D ultrasound speaks volumes. Med Imaging 1999;62–9
   Google Scholar
• Sehn SC. Psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:887
   Google Scholar
• Visser MJ. The psychological effect of a sonar examination on parents-to-be. Curationis 1986;9:11–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weil SG. The unspoken needs of families during high-risk pregnancies. Am J Nurs 1981;81:2047–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhorm RH. Prenatal ultrasonography: first do no harm? Lancet 1998;352:1568–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart N. Women’s views of ultrasonography in obstetrics. Birth 1986;13:39–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwa PD, Dunkel-Schetter C, Chicz-DeMet A, et al. Prenatal psychosocial factors and the neuro- endocrine axis in human pregnancy. Psychosom Med 1996;58:432–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar