Sonographic diagnosis of cervical incompetence in twin pregnancies

References

• Romero R, Mazor M, Munoz H, et al. The preterm labor syndrome. Ann NY Acad Sci 1994;734:414–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, van Eyck J. Sonographic diagnosis of cervical incompetence for prevention and management. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2001;1:195–204
   Google Scholar
• Guyer B, MacDorman MF, Martin JA, Peters KD, Strobino DM. Annual summary of vital statistics 1997. Pediatrics 1998;102:1333–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack M, Horbar JD, Malloy MH, Tyson JE, Wright E, Wright L. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network. Pediatrics 1991;87:587–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glinianaia SV, Pharoah P, Sturgiss SN. Comparative trends in cause-specific fetal and neonatal mortality in twin and singleton births in North of England, 1982–1994. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:452–60
   Google Scholar
• Keith LG, Oleszczuk JJ, Keith DM. Multiple gestation: reflections on epidemiology, causes, and consequences. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2000;45:206–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neilson JP. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, et al. Longi-tudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:31–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uldbjerg N, Ekman G, Malstrom A. Ripening of the human uterine cervix related to changes in collagen, glycosaminoglycans and collagenolytic activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;147:662–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmers R, Blaser J, Kuhn W, Tschesche H. Interleukin-8 synthesis and the onset of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:223–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papiernik E, Bouyer J, Collin D. Precocious cervical ripening and preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:238–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman RB, Godsey RK, Ellings JM, et al. Quanti- fication of cervical change: relationship to preterm delivery in the multifetal gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:264–9,Discussion 269–71
   Google Scholar
• Buekens P, Alexander S, Boutsen M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of routine cervical examinations in pregnancy. European Community Collaborative Study Group on Prenatal Screening. Lancet 1994;344:841–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, et al. Three- dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:351–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Aardenburg R, van Eyck J. Maternal position and ultrasonic cervical assessment in multiple pregnancy. Preliminary observations. J Reprod Med 1997;42:719–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1047–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerholm UB, Holm B, Mattsby-Baltzer I, et al. Fetal fibronectin, endotoxin, bacterial vaginosis and cervical length as predictors of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1398–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crane JMG, Van den Hof M, Armson BA, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: singleton and twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:357–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imseis HM, Albert TA, Iams JD. Identifying twin gestations at low risk for preterm birth with a transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement at 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souka AP, Heath V, Flint S, Sevastopoulou I, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks in twins in predicting spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:450–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Kuhlman K, Daly S, Berghella V. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sono- graphy in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:288–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, O’Reilly-Green C, et al. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spon- taneous preterm birth in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1103–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldsmith LT, Weiss G. The preterm pre- diction study: maternal serum relaxin, sonographic cervical length, and spontaneous preterm birth in twins. J Soc Gynecol Invest 2001;6:39–42
   Google Scholar
• Skentou C, Souka AP, To MS, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:7–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels WH, Schreiber FR, Padgett RJ, et al. Ultra- sound surveillance of the cervix in twin gestation for the management of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:739–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arabin B. The state of the art in cervical assessment in twin gestations. In Carrera JM, Cabero L, Baraibar R, eds. The Perinatal Medicine of the New Millennium. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress of Perinatal Medicine. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 2001:564–7
   Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, et al. Long- itudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:31–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther CA. Hospitalisation and bed rest for multiple pregnancy (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2001
   Google Scholar
• McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957;64:346–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shirodkar JN. A new method of operation for habitual abortions in second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955;52:290–300
   Google Scholar
• Macnaughton MC, Chalmers IG, Dubowitz V, et al. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Multi- centre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:516–23
   Google Scholar
• Heath VC, Souka AP, Erasmus I, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: the value of Shirodkar suture for the short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12:318–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan S, Romero R, Maymon E, et al. Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1325–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maly Z, Deutinger J. Decrease in cerclage incidence in multiple pregnancies by vaginal ultrasound monitor- ing. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1993;197:162–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newcomer J. Pessaries for the treatment of incom- petent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:443–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eyck J, Risseeuw B, Arabin B. Delayed-interval delivery in multiple pregnancy: techniques and results. In Kurjak A, ed. Textbook of Perinatal Medicine, Vol 2. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 1998: 1542–49
   Google Scholar