Efficacy of a novel intense pulsed light system for the treatment of port wine stains

References

• Barsky SH, Rosen S, Geer DE, Noe JM. The nature and evolution of port wine stains: A computer-assisted study. J Invest Dermatol. 1980;74(3):154–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haedersdal M, Efsen J, Gniadecka M, Fogh H, Keiding J, Wulf HC. Changes in skin redness, pigmentation, echostructure, thickness, and surface contour after 1 pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in children. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134(2):175–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta G, Bilsland D. A prospective study of the impact of laser treatment on vascular lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 143(2):356–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen K, Kreiter CD, Rosenbaum M, Whitaker DC, Arpey CJ. Long-term psychological impact and perceived efficacy of pulsed-dye laser therapy for patients with port-wine stains. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(l):49–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enjolras O, Riche MC, Merland JJ. Facial port-wine stains and Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatrics. 1985; 76(1):48–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maari C, Frieden IJ. Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: The importance of ‘geographic stains’ in identifying lymphatic disease and risk of complications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 51(3):391–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang CJ, Kelly KM, Van Gemert MJ, Nelson JS. Comparing the effectiveness of 585-nm vs 595-nm wavelength pulsed dye laser treatment of port wine stains in conjunction with cryogen spray cooling. Lasers Surg Med. 2002; 31(5):352–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kono T, Sakurai H, Groff WF, Chan HH, Takeuchi M, Yamaki T, . Comparison study of a traditional pulsed dye laser versus a long-pulsed dye laser in the treatment of early childhood hemangiomas. Lasers Surg Med. 2006; 38(2):112–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan OT, Morrison P, Kurban AK. 585 nm for the treatment of port-wine stains. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(6): 1112–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woo SH, Ahn HH, Kim SN, Kye YC. Treatment of vascular skin lesions with the variable-pulse 595 nm pulsed dye laser. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(l):41–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bucci J, Goldberg D. Past, present, and future: Vascular lasers/ light devices. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006; 8(3):149–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pence B, Aybey B, Ergenekon G. Outcomes of 532 nm frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser use in the treatment of port-wine stains. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31(5):509–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang MU, Yaroslavsky AN, Farinelli WA, Flotte TJ, Rius-Diaz F, Tsao SS, . Long-pulsed neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser treatment for port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(3 Pt l):480–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjerring P, Christiansen K, Troilius A. Intense pulsed light source for the treatment of dye laser resistant port-wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2003; 5(1):7–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan PC, Chan HH. Treatment of port wine stains with intense pulsed light: A prospective study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(6):887–90; discussion 890–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eubanks LE, McBurney EI. Videomicroscopy of port-wine stains: Correlation of location and depth of lesion. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 44(6):948–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiskerstrand EJ, Svaasand LO, Kopstad G, Ryggen K, Aase S. Photothermally induced vessel-wall necrosis after pulsed dye laser treatment: Lack of response in port-wine stains with small sized or deeply located vessels. J Invest Dermatol. 1996; 107(5):671–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross EV, Smirnov M, Pankratov M, Altshuler G. Intense pulsed light and laser treatment of facial telangiectasias and dyspigmentation: Some theoretical and practical comparisons. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 2):1188–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton JK, Frangineas G, Pummer H, Black JF. Cooperative phenomena in two-pulse, two-color laser photocoagulation of cutaneous blood vessels. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;73(6): 642–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton JK, Vargas G, Pfefer TJ, Welch AJ. Laser fluence for permanent damage of cutaneous blood vessels. Photochem Photobiol. 1999; 70(6):916–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Cao D, Hammer-Wilson MJ, Nelson JS. Vascular response to laser photothermolysis as a function of pulse duration, vessel type, and diameter: Implications for port wine stain laser therapy. Lasers Surg Med. 2002;30(2): 160–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sivarajan V, Mackay IR. The depth measuring videomicro-scope (DMV): A non-invasive tool for the assessment of capillary vascular malformations. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(2): 193–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verkruysse W, Lucassen GW, van Gemert MJ. Simulation of color of port wine stain skin and its dependence on skin variables. Lasers Surg Med. 1999; 25(2):131–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troilius AM, Ljunggren B. Evaluation of port wine stains by laser Doppler perfusion imaging and reflectance photometry before and after pulsed dye laser treatment. Acta Derm Venereol. 1996; 76(4):291–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rah DK, Kim SC, Lee KH, Park BY, Kim DW. Objective evaluation of treatment effects on port-wine stains using L*a*b* color coordinates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(4): 842–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung B, Kim CS, Choi B, Kelly KM, Nelson JS. Use of erythema index imaging for systematic analysis of port wine stain skin response to laser therapy. Lasers Surg Med. 2005; 37 (3): 186–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolotov LE, Sinichkin YP, Tuchin VV, Utz SR, Altshuler GB, Yaroslavsky IV. Design and evaluation of a novel portable erythema-melanin-meter. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(2): 127–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar