Ultrasound associated with caffeine increases basal and beta-adrenoceptor response in adipocytes isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue in pigs

References

• Wanner M, Avram M. An evidence-based assessment of treatments for cellulite. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7:341–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Godoy JMP, De Godoy MFG. Treatment of cellulite based on the hypothesis of a novel physiopathology. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2011;4:55–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akomeah FK. Topical dermatological drug delivery: Quo vadis? Current Drug Deliv. 2010;7(4):283–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fellinger K, Schmid J. Klinik und merapiedes Chmnischen Gelenkhuematismum. Vienna, Austria: Maudrich (Austrian);1954: 549–552.
   Google Scholar
• Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics 2014;54:56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia Filho ALM, Villaverde AB, Munin E, Aimbire F, Albertini R. Comparative study of the topical application of aloe vera gel, therapeutic ultrasound and phonophoresis on the tissue repair in collagenase-induced rat tendinitis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36: 1682–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires-De-Campos MSM, Polacow MLO, Granzotto TM, Spadari-Bratfisch RC, Leonardi GR, Grassi-Kassisse DM. Influence of the ultrasound in cutaneous permeation of the caffeine: In vitro study. Pharmacol Online. 2007;1:477–486. Retrieve from: http://pharmacologyonline.silae.it/files/archives/2007/vol1/49_Campos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pires-De-Campos MSM, Leonardi GR, Chorilli M, Spadari-Bratfisch RC, Polacow MLO, Grassi-Kassisse DM. The effect of topical caffeine on the morphology of swine hypodermis as measured by ultrasound. J Cosm Derm 2008;7:232–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boucaud A, Machet L, Arbeille B, Machet M, Sournac M, Mavon A, Patat F, Vaillant L. In vitro study of low-frequency ultrasound-enhanced transdermal transport of fentanyl and caffeine across human and hairless rat skin, Int. J. Pharm. 2001;228:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Langin D. Adipose tissue lipolysis as a metabolic pathway to define pharmacological strategies against obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Pharmacol Res. 2006;53:482–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhalla AK, Chisholm JW, Reaven GM, Belardinelli L. A1 adenosine receptor: role in diabetes and obesity. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;193:271–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gharibi B, Abraham AA, Ham J, Evans BAJ.Contrasting effects of A1 and A2b adenosine receptors on adipogenesis. Int J Obes. 2012;36:397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias M, Farinha A, Faustino E, Hadgraft J, Pais J, Toscano C. Topical delivery of caffeine from some commercial formulations. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarheed O, Rasool BKA. Development of an optimised application protocol for sonophoretic transdermal delivery of a model hydrophilic drug. Open Biomed Eng J. 2011;5:14–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredholm BB, Battig K, Holmen J, Nehlig A, Zvartau EE. Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:83–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman A, Herman AP. Caffeine's mechanisms of action and its cosmetic use. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2013;26:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddons S. Cellulite causes and treatments. Discov Fit Health. 2013;22:1 http://health.howstuffworks.com/skin-care/problems/beauty/cellulite2015.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lupi O, Semenovitch IJ, Treu C, Bottino D, Bouskela E. Evaluation of the effects of caffeine in the microcirculation and edema on thighs and buttocks using the orthogonal polarization spectral imaging and clinical parameters. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6(2):102–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velasco MV, Tano CT, Machado-Santelli GM, Consiglieri VO, Kaneko TM, Baby AR. Effects of caffeine and siloxanetriol alginate caffeine, as anticellulite agents, on fatty tissue: histological evaluation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7(1):23–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergen WG, Mersmann HJ. Comparative aspects of lipid metabolism: Impact on contemporary research and use of animal models. J Nutr. 2005;135:2499–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeel RL, Mersmann HJ. Distribution and quantification of beta1-, beta2- and beta3- adrenergic receptor subtype transcripts in porcine tissues. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:611–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding ST, McNeel RL, O’Brian Smith E, Mersmann HJ. Modulation of porcine adipocyte β-adrenergic receptors by a β-adrenergic agonist. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:919–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfert ED, Cross BM, McWilliam AA. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Council on Animal Care; 1993. p. 213.
   Google Scholar
• Watson R. Ultrasound in contemporary physiotherapy pratice. Ultrasonics. 2008;48:321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassi-Kassisse DM, Wolf-Nunes V, Miotto AM, Farias-Silva E, Souza Brito ARM, Nunes DS, et al. Sensitivity to β-adrenoceptor agonists of adipocytes from rats treated with an aqueous extract of Croton cajucara Benth. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003;55:253–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crege DRX de O, Silveira HJV, Chaim ÉAC, Pareja JC, Géloen A, Grassi-Kassisse DM. Sex difference in lactate production by adipocytes from lean humans. Open J Endocrine Metab Dis. 2014;4:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan MW, Artiss JD, Strandbergh DR, Zak B. A peroxidase coupled method for the colorimetric determination of serum triglycerides. Clin Chem. 1983;29:538–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice JA. Matematical statistical and data analysis. Belmont: Thomson; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mills SE, Mersmann HJ. Beta-adrenergic agonists, their receptors, and growth: Special reference to the peculiarities in pigs. In: Smith SB, Smith DR, editors. Biology of fat in meat animals: Current advances. Champaign, IL: American Society of Animal Science; 1995. pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Liang W, Mills SE. Distribution of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes in pig tissues. FASEB J. 1999;13:A258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huong SR, Bun H, Fourneron JD, Reynier JP, Andrieu V. Use of various models for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies of ultraviolet filters. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15:253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giancamillo A, Rossi R, Vitari F, Pastorelli F, Corino C, Domeneghini C. Dietaryconjugatedlinoleicacidsdecreaseleptin in porcine adipose tissue. J Nutr. 2009;139:1867–1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães GN, Chorilli M, Leonardi GR, Prestes OS, Garcia G, Pires-de-Campos MSM, Polacow MLO. Effects of formulations containing dimethylaminoethanol (DMAE) acetoamidobenzoate and pidolate on the skin. Lat Am J. 2011;30:614–616.
   Google Scholar
• Feve B, Emorine LJ, Lasnier F, Blin N, Baude B, Nahmias C, Strosberg AD, Pairault J. 1991. Atypical β-adrenergic receptor in 3T3–F442A adipocytes. J Biol Chem.1991;266:20329–20336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langin D, Portillo MP, Saulnier-Blache J-S, Lafontan M. Coexistence of three β-adrenoceptor subtypes in white fat cells of various mammalian species. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991:199;291–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castan I, Valet P, Quideau N, Voisin T, Ambid L, Laburthe M, et al. Antilipolytic effects of alpha2-adrenergic agonists, neuropeptide Y, adenosine, and PGE1 in mammal adipocytes. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R1141–R1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Q, Ginsberg HN, Erlanger BF. Overexpression of the A1 adenosine receptor in adipose tissue protects mice from obesity related insulin resistance. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2001;3:360–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoelch C, Kuhlmann J, Gossel M, Mueller G, Neumann-Haefelin C, Belz U et al. Characterization of adenosine-A1 receptor-mediated antilipolysis in rats by tissue microdialysis, 1 H spectroscopy and glucose clamp studies. Diabetes. 2004;53:1920–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam RM, Hu FB. Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294:97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delphine G, Gondret F, Louveau, I. Lipid metabolism and secretory function of porcine intramuscular adipocytes compared with subcutaneous and perirenal adipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291:E372–E380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersmann HJ. Adenosine-theophylline interactions on the lipolytic response to beta-adrenergic agonists in porcine adipose tissue. Camp Biochem Physiol. 1992; 103C(3):541–547.
   Google Scholar
• Mersmann HJ, Shparber A. Is the lipolytic response in porcine adipose tissue slices equivalent to the lipolytic response in isolated adipocytes? Int J Biochem. 1993;25(11):1673–1679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farias-Silva E, Grassi-Kassisse DM, Wolf-Nunes V, Spadari-Bratfisch, RC. Stress-induced alteration in the lipolytic response to β-adrenoceptor agonists in rat white adipocytes. J Lip Res. 1999;40(9):1719–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao R, Nanda S. Sonophoresis: Recent advancements and future trends. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;61:689–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Du LN, Lu CT, Jin YG, Ge SP. Potential and problems in ultrasound-responsive drug delivery systems. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:1621–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azagury A, Khoury L, Enden G, Kost J. Ultrasound mediated transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:127–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J Control Rel. 2011;152:330–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrich RJ, Morales DE, Krueger JE, Ansari M, Ochoa O Jr et al. Comparative lipoplasty analysis of in vivo-treated adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2152–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia O Jr, Schafer M. The effects of nonfocused external ultrasound on tisseu temperature and adipocyte morphology. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:117–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick D, Adamovics A, Edmonds PD, Taenzer JC. Search for biochemical effects in cells and tissues of ultrasonic irradiation of mice and of the in vitro irradiation of mouse peritoneal and human amniotic cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1979;5:23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leighton TG. What is ultrasound? Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007; 93(1–3):3–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DL. Ultrasound physics and instrumentation. Saint Louis: Mosby; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Altomare M, Nascimento AP, Romana-Souza B, Amadeu TP, Monte-Alto-Costa A. Ultrasound accelerates healing of normal wounds but not of ischemic ones. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(6):825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem DM, Maciel CD, Zuanon JÁ, Neto CB, Parizotto NA. Histological analysis of healthy epithelium of Wistar rats in vivo irradiated with different intensities of therapeutic ultrasound. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(2):114–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goraj-Szczypiorowska B, Zajac L, Skalska-Izdebska R. Evaluation of factors influencing the quality and efficacy of ultrasound and phonophoresis treatment. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9:449–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar