References
- Kier R, McCarthy S M, Scoutt L M, Viscarello R R, Schwartz P E. Pelvic masses in pregnancy: MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 176: 709–713
- Weinreb J C, Barkoff N D, Meigbow A, Demopoulos R. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses in pregnancy. Am J Radiol 1990; 154: 295–299
- Curtis M, Hopkins M P, Zarlingo T, Martino C, Graciansky‐Lengyl M, Jenison E L. Magnetic resonance imaging to avoid laparotomy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 833–836
- Levine D, Barnes P D, Madsen J R, Abbott J, Mehta T, Edelman R R. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 1011–1019
- Kubik‐Huch R A, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Ladd M E, Meicer A, Marincek B. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations by ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 1205–1208
- Hricak H, Lacey C, Schrick E, Fisher M, Amparo E, Dooms G, Jaffe R. Gynecologic masses: value of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 31–37
- Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks L E, Sheldon P E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. Am J Radiol 1983; 141: 1119–1128
- Kawakami S, Togashi K, Konishi I, Kimura I, Fukuoka M, Mori T, Knoishi J. Red degeneration of uterine leiomyoma: MR appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18: 925–928