References
- World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labor. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2011. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501156_eng.pdf [last accessed August 2013]
- Osterman MJK, Martin JA. Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States, 1996–2011. NCHS data brief 2013. no 124. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013
- Thorsell M, Lyrenas S, Andolf E, Kaijser M. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1094–9
- Osmundson S, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:583–7
- Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009;18;151:252–63, W53–63
- Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628–33
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:386–97
- Rayburn WF. Preinduction cervical ripening: basis and methods of current practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002;57:683–92
- Simpson KR, Atterbury J. Trends and issues in labor induction in the United States: implications for clinical practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003;32:767–79
- Rayamajhi RT, Karki C, Shrestha N, Padhye SM. Indication for labour induction and predictors for failed induction at KMCTH. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2009;7:21–5
- Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, et al. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:305.e1–5
- Oliveira TA, Melo EM, Aquino MM, et al. Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2011;33:118–22
- Balci O, Mahmoud AS, Ozdemir S, Acar A. Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;110:64–7
- Fox NS, Saltzman DH, Roman AS, et al. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:647–54
- Abramovici D, Goldwasser S, Mabie BC, et al. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1108–12
- Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:177–87; discussion 187–8
- Hirata E, Koyama M, Murakami G, et al. Comparative histological study of levels 1–3 supportive tissues using pelvic floor semiserial sections from elderly nulliparous and multiparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011;37:13–23