References
- Britt DW, Risinger ST, Miller V, et al. Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome: bringing in context. Am J Med Genet 2000;93:410–16
- Evans MI, Sobiecki MA, Krivchenia EL, et al. Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis: "what" is still more important than "when". Am J Med Genet 1996;61:353–5
- Mezei G, Papp C, Toth-Pal E, et al. Factors influencing parental decision making in prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:94–101
- Pazol K, Creanga AA, Zane SB, et al.; Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Abortion surveillance – United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 2012;61:1–44
- Pryde PG, Isada NB, Hallak M, et al. Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non-aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:52–6
- Quadrelli R, Quadrelli A, Mechoso B, et al. Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in a setting where termination of pregnancy is not legally available. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:228–32
- Schechtman KB, Gray DL, Baty JD, Rothman SM. Decision-making for termination of pregnancies with fetal anomalies: analysis of 53,000 pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:216–22
- Shaffer BL, Caughey AB, Norton ME. Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn 2006;26:667–71
- Skjeldestad FE, Borgan JK. Trends in induced abortion during the 12 years since legalization in Norway. Fam Plann Perspect 1994;26:73–6
- Skjeldestad FE, Borgan JK, Daltveit AK, Nymoen EH. Induced abortion. Effects of marital status, age and parity on choice of pregnancy termination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:255–60
- Zlotogora J. Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy with an abnormal finding after an invasive prenatal test. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:1102–6
- Law of 7 January 1993 on family planning, protection of human fetuses, and the conditions under which pregnancy termination is permissible
- Dzurova D, Pikhart H. Down syndrome, paternal age and education: comparison of California and the Czech Republic. BMC Public Health 2005;5:69
- Velie EM, Shaw GM. Impact of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination on prevalence and risk estimates of neural tube defects in California, 1989–1991. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:473–9
- Paolini CI, Gadow A, Petracchi F, et al. Prenatal screening for chromosome abnormalities in a region with no access to termination of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:659–63
- Smith LK, Budd JL, Field DJ, Draper ES. Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study. BMJ 2011;343:1–9
- Stalhandske ML, Makenzius M, Tyden T, Larsson M. Existential experiences and needs related to induced abortion in a group of Swedish women: a quantitative investigation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2012;33:53–61
- Peller AJ, Westgate MN, Holmes LB. Trends in congenital malformations, 1974–1999: effect of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:957–64
- Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland 2012. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office; 2012