Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls

References

• Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 1997. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Natl Vital Stat System 1999;47:1–96
   Google Scholar
• Fell MR. External cephalic version. Lancet 1953;265:264–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, et al. Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstetr Gynecol 2009;113:1231–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JM, Macario A, Carvalho B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation. BMC Preg Childbirth 2010;10:3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice Bulletin – Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists – Number 13, February 2000. Obstetr Gynecol 2000;95:1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher M, Bujold E, Marquette GP, Vezina Y. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2003;189:751–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyer CH, Heard MJ. A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome? J Obstetr Gynaecol 2001;21:580–2
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson 2nd JE, Armstrong MA, Dyson DC. Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version. Obstetr Gynecol 1987;70:722–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan P, Carvalho B. Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: a systematic review. Int J Obstetr Anesth 2011;20:299–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzinger KR, Harper LM, Tuuli MG, et al. Effect of regional anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetr Gynecol 2011;118:1137–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, et al. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstetr Gynecol 2008;112:1143–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand 2004;83:511–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher M, Marquette GP, Varin J, et al. Fetomaternal hemorrhage during external cephalic version. Obstetr Gynecol 2008;112:79–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KW, Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1997;176:218–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo CL, Bollapragada S, Mackenzie F. Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage following failed external cephalic version: case report. J Perinatal Med 2006;34:250–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Meir A, Elram T, Tsafrir A, et al. The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2007;196:157 e1–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neiger R, Hennessy MD, Patel M. Reattempting failed external cephalic version under epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1998;179:1136–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner G, Xu F, Simbrunner C, et al. Single-institute experience, management, success rate, and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr 2012;116:134–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broussard CS, Gilboa SM, Lee KA, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in infant mortality attributable to birth defects by gestational age. Pediatrics 2012;130:e518–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Feresu SA, Barsoom MJ. Heterogeneity of preterm birth subtypes in relation to neonatal death. Obstetr Gynecol 2009;114:516–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, et al. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2011;204:491 e1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1992;166:851–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson 2nd JE, Sistrom CL. Can fetal-pelvic disproportion be predicted. Clin Obstetr Gynecol 2000;43:247–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr 2002;79:221–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwosu EC, Walkinshaw S, Chia P, et al. Undiagnosed breech. Brit J Obstetr Gynaecol 1993;100:531–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung WC, Pun TC, Wong WM. Undiagnosed breech revisited. Brit J Obstetr Gynaecol 1999;106:638–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laros Jr RK, Flanagan TA, Kilpatrick SJ. Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1995;172:1916–23; discussion 23–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojansky N, Tsafrir A, Ophir E, Ezra Y. Induction of labor in breech presentation. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr 2001;74:151–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Bowes Jr WA, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstetr Gynecol 1993;82:306–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, et al. Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2004;190:763–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, et al. High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic version. BJOG 2002;109:627–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, et al. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstetr Gynecol 2008;112:1143–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok M, van der Steeg JW, van der Post JA, Mol BW. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:103–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar