Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection in the neonatal unit: a literature review

References

• O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns L, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:1–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon G. Neonatal long lines. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F260–2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1249–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudeck MA, Weiner LM, Allen-Bridson K, et al. National healthcare safety network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2012, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:1148–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright DW. Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2186 catheters. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F504–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien LY, Macnab Y, Aziz K, et al. Variations in central venous catheter-related infection risks among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:505–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland JS, Alex CP, Sevallius JM, et al. Cohort study of the pathogenesis and molecular epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infection in neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:243–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, et al. Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics 2008;121:e1152–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohki Y, Yoshizawa Y, Watanabe M, et al. Complications of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters in Japanese neonates. Pediatr Int 2008;50:636–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen AL, Reinholdt J, Jensen AM, et al. Nosocomial infection in a Danish neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr 2009;98:1294–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zwet WC, Kaiser AM, van Elburg RM, et al. Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates. J Hosp Infect 2005;61:300–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint S, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA. The clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial central venous catheter-related infection:are antimicrobial catheters useful? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:375–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams-Chapman I, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infection and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in the preterm infant. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006;19:290–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler D, Stoll BJ, Schmidt B, et al. Using a count of neonatal morbidities to predict poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants: added role of neonatal infection. Pediatrics 2009;123:313–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RL, Faix RG. Persistent bacteremia and outcome in late onset infection among infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22:17–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahieu LM, Buitenweg N, Beutels PH, De Dooy JJ. Additional hospital stay and charges due to hospital-acquired infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:223–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne NR, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, et al. Marginal increase in cost and excess length of stay associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in surviving very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;114:348–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, et al. epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:S1–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JE, McDonald SJ, Tan K. A survey of central venous catheter practices in Australian and New Zealand tertiary neonatal units. Aust Crit Care 2014;27:36–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpe E, Pettit J, Ellsbury DL. A national survey of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) practices. Adv Neonat Care 2013;13:55–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyce JM, Pittet D. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Hand Hygiene Task Force. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:S3–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam BCC, Lee J, Lau YL. Hand hygiene practices in a neonatal intensive care unit: a multimodal intervention and impact on nosocomial infection. Pediatrics 2004;114:e565–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capretti MG, Sandri F, Tridapalli E, et al. Impact of a standardized hand hygiene program on the incidence of nosocomial infection in very low birth weight infants. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:430–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Hoogen A, Brouwer A, Verboon-Maciolek MA, et al. Improvement of adherence to hand hygiene practice using a multimodal intervention program in a neonatal intensive care. J Nurs Care Qual 2011;26:22–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:231–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa YKT, Haga Y, Ishikawa M, et al. Maximal sterile barrier precautions do not reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections in general surgery units: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2010;251:620–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzarro MJ, Sabo B, Noonan M, et al. A quality improvement initiative to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:241–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry S, Honeycutt M, Goins G, Gilliam C. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in the NICU: getting to zero. Neonatal Network 2009;28:151–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan HC, Lannon C, Walsh MC, et al. Ohio statewide quality-improvement collaborative to reduce late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2011;127:427–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman J, Stricof R, Stevens TP, et al. Statewide NICU central-line-associated bloodstream infection rates decline after bundles and checklists. Pediatrics 2011;127:436–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtschafter DD, Powers RJ, Pettit J, et al. Nosocomial infection reduction in VLBW infants with a statewide quality-improvement model. Pediatrics 2011;127:419–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malathi I, Millar MR, Leeming JP, et al. Skin disinfection in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child 1993;169:312–16
   Google Scholar
• Inwood S. Skin antisepsis: using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol. Br J Nurs 2008;16:1392–4
   Google Scholar
• Mimoz O, Pieroni L, Lawrence C, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 1996;24:1818–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renes SH, Pompe JC, Renes MH. Prevention of intravascular central venous catheter-related infections: 0.5% concentration of chlorhexidine preparation with alcohol for skin preparation and femoral vein for renal replacement therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:745–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valles J, Fernandez I, Alcaraz D, et al. Prospective randomized trial of 3 antiseptic solutions for prevention of catheter colonization in an intensive care unit for adult patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:847–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Ringer M. Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine fro the prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 1991;338:339–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter site care: a meta analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:792–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHMRC. Australian guidelines for the prevention and control of infection in healthcare. Commonwealth of Australia; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Linder N, Prince S, Barzilai A, et al. disinfection with 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropanol in the neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:205–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland JS, Buck R, Maloney P, et al. Comparison of 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter colinization in neonates: a prospective trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995;14:510–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Hart J, Vemgal P, Harrison C. Prospective evaluation of a multi-factorial prevention strategy on the impact of nosocomial infection in very low birthweight infants. J Hosp Infect 2005;61:162–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland JS, Alex CP, Uhing MR, et al. Pilot trial to compare tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate to povidone-iodine antisepsis for central venous catheter placement in neonates. J Perinatol 2009;29:808–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta MK, Clarke P. Current practices in skin antisepsis for central venous catheterisation in UK tertiary-level neonatal units. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F328
   Google Scholar
• Tamma PD, Aucott SW, Milestone AM. Chlorhexidine use in the neonatal intensive care unit: results from a national survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:846–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;8:700–7
   Google Scholar
• Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, et al. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2595 catheters. Crit Care Med 2005;9:631–5
   Google Scholar
• Wardle SP, Kellsall AWR, Yoxall CW, Subhedar NV. Percutaneous femoral arterial and venous catheterisation during neonatal intensive care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F119–22
   Google Scholar
• Tsai M-H, Lien R, Wang J-W, et al. Complication rates with central venous catheters inserted at femoral and non-femoral sites in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:966–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, et al. Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics 2008;121:e1152–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenk KE, Gerbasi JB, Summerl EC, et al. Central venous catheterization in neonates: pilot evaluation of long-term transparent dressings. Neonatal Pharmacol Q 1993;2:25–30
   Google Scholar
• Pettit J, Wyckoff MM. National Association of Neonatal Nurses (NANN): peripherally inserted central catheters: guideline for practice, 2nd ed. Glenview (IL): National Association of Neonatal Nurses; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Aly H, Herson V, Duncan A, et al. Is bloodstream infection preventable among premature infants? A tale of two cities. Pediatrics 2005;115:1513–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler K, Giaccone MJ, Hutchinson N, et al. A hospital-wide quality-improvement collaborative to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections. Pediatrics 2011;128:e995–1007
   Google Scholar
• Garland J, Alex C, Mueller C, et al. A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates. Pediatrics 2001;107:1431–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak AZ, Ross R, Ngo T, Shoemaker CT. A randomized controlled evaluation of absorption of silver with the use of silver alginate (Algidex) patches in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with central lines. J Perinatol 2010;30:337–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley S, Clare S. ANTT: a standard approach to aseptic technique. Nurs Times 2011;107:12–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowley S, Clare S. Improving standards of aseptic practice through an ANTT trust-wide implementation process: a matter of prioritisation and care. J Infect Prevent 2009;10:S18–23
   Google Scholar
• Casey A, Worthington T, Lambert P, et al. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the Posi-flow needleless connector. J Hosp Infect 2003;54:288–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitges-Serra A, Puig P, Linares J. Hub colonization as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter-related sepsis due to coagulase negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1984;8:668–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menyhay SZ, Maki DG. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:23–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons S, Bryson C, Porter S. Scrub the hub, cleaning duration and reduction in bacterial load on central venous catheters. Crit Care Nurs 2011;34:31–5
   Google Scholar
• Lockman JL, Heitmiller ES, Ascenzi JA, Berkowitz I. Scrub the Hub! Catheter needleless port decontamination. Anesthesiology 2011;114:958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaler W, Chinn R. Successful disinfection of needleless access ports: a matter of time and friction. JAVA 2007;12:140–7
   Google Scholar
• Soothill JS, Bravery K, Ho A, et al. A fall in bloodstream infections followed a change to 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropanol for catheter connection antisepsis: a pediatric single center before/after study on a hemopoietic stem cell transplant ward. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:626–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishay M, Retrosi G, Horn V, et al. Chlorhexidine antisepsis significantly reduces the incidence of sepsis and septicemia during parenteral nutrition in surgical infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1064–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies D, O’Riordan L, Wallen M, et al. Optimal timing for intravenous administration set replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:(4):CD003588
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta A, Lehmann C, Diener-West M, et al. Catheter duration and risk of CLA-BSI in neonates with PICCs. Pediatrics 2010;125:648–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110:285–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland J, Alex C, Henrickson K, et al. A vancomycin-heparin lock solution for prevention of nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: a prospective, randomized trial. Pediatrics 2005;116:e198–205
   Google Scholar
• Seliem W, Hesham A, El Nady G. Amikacin heparin lock for the prevention of catheter related bloodstream infections in neonates with extended umbilical venous catheters: a randomised controlled trial. J Neonatal Perinat Med 2010;3:33–41
   Google Scholar
• Filippi L, Pezzati M, Di Amario S, et al. Fusidic acid and heparin lock solution for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in critically ill neonates: a retrospective study and a prospective, radomized trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007;8:556–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston PJ. Antibiotic resistance in the NICU. Neonatal Netw J Neonatal Nurs 2012;31:109–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jardine LA, Inglis GDT, Davies MW. Prophylactic systemic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in neonates with central venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(4):CD006179
   Google Scholar
• Lodha A, Furlan AD, Whyte H, Moore AM. Prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream bacterial infection in preterm neonates: a systematic review. J Perinatol 2008;28:526–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quach C, Milstone AM, Perpete C, et al. Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: impact on central line-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:158–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannoh S, Clones B, Munoz J, et al. A multimodal approach to central venous catheter hub care can decrease catheter-related bloodstream infection. Am J Infect control 2010;38:424–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SK, Aziz K, Singhal N, et al. Improving the quality of care for infants: a cluster, randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2009;181:469–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombek SG, Rohan AJ, Parvez B, et al. “Proactive” management of percutaneously inserted central catheters results in decreased incidence of infection in the ELBW population. J Perinatol 2002;22:209–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler-O’Hara M, D’Angio C, Hoey H, Stevens TP. An evidence-based catheter bundle alters central venous catheter strategy in newborn infants. J Pediatr 2012;160:972–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kime T, Mohsini K, Nwankwo MU, Turner B. Central line “attention” is their best prevention. Adv Neonat Care 2011;11:242–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor T, Massaro A, Williams L, et al. Effect of a dedicated percutaneously inserted central catheter team on neonatal catheter-related bloodstream infection. Adv Neonat Care 2011;11:122–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Semelsberger CF. Educational interventions to reduce the rate of central catheter-related bloodstream infections in the NICU: a review of the research literature. Neonat Netw 2009;28:391–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acolet D, Allen E, Houston R, et al. Improvement in neonatal intensive care unit care: a cluster randomised controlled trial of active dissemination of information. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonat Ed 2011;96:F434–9
   Google Scholar
• Taylor T, Massaro A, Williams L, et al. Effect of a dedicated percutaneously inserted central catheter team on neonatal catheter-related bloodstream infection. Adv Neonat Care 2011;11:122–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holzmann-Pazgal G, Kubanda A, Davis K, et al. Utilizing a line maintenance team to reduce central-line-associated bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2012;32:281–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar