Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a meta-analysis

References

• Crane J, Leduc L, Farine D, et al. Induction of labour at term. SOGC clinical practice guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2001;23:717–41
   Google Scholar
• Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, et al. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:486.e1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi H. Cervical ripenning and labor induction: clinical guidelines. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:524–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs TM. Oxytocin for labor induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:489–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justus Hofmeyr G. Induction of labour with an unfavourable cervix. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;17:777–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin SC, Sanchez-Ramos L, Adair CD. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:624.e1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Lv J, Hu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;40:897–906
   Google Scholar
• Gregson S, Waterstone M, Norman I, Murrells T. A randomised controled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term. BJOG 2005;112:438–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan S, Çaliskan E, Doğer E, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:19–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan TC, Yan SY, Chua TM, et al. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming. BJOG 2010;117:1270–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayaz A, Shaukat S, Farooq MU, et al. Induction of labor: a comparative study of Intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010;49:151–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed GA, Fakhar S, Nisar N, Alam AY. Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011;50:15e–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena P, Puri M, Bajaj M, et al. A randomized conctrol trails to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011;15:759–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager M, Eneroth-Grimfors E, Edlund M, Marions L. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction. BJOG 2008;115:1443–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitrakar NS. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2012;10:10–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gemund N, Scherjon S, LeCessie S, et al. A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginalmisoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction. Intl J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;111:42–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denguezli W, Trimech A, et al. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versusintracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:119–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouzi AA, Alsibiani S, Mansouri N, et al. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:56.e1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulshreshtha S, Sharma P, Mohan G, et al. Comparative study of misoprostol vs. dinoprostone for induction of labour. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2007;51:55–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wing DA, Brown R, Plante LA, et al. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:201–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing DA. Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Consortium. Misoprostol vaginal Insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:801–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silfeler DB, Tandogan B, Ayvaci H, et al. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284:1331–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen JF, Bergholt T, Løkkegaard EC. Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen. Dan Med J 2013;60:A4706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber G, Schütz H, Seelbach-Göbel B. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone is it effective and safe? J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.942629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marconi AM, Bozzetti P, Morabito A, Pardi G. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:135–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagpal MB, Raghunandan C, Saili A. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009;106:23–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucett AM, Daniels K, Lee HC, et al. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term. J Perinatol 2014;34:95–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham C, Meirowitz N, Kohn N. Labor Induction for premature rupture of membranes using vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert. Am J Perinatol 2014;31:181–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar