References
- Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;2010:e1–37
- Altman DG. Comparability of randomised groups. J R Stat Soc 1985;34:125–36
- Senn S. Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials. Stat Med 2013;32:1439–50
- Krueger J. Null hypothesis significance testing – On the survival of a flawed method. Am Psychol 2001;56:16–26
- Levine TR, Weber R, Hullet C, et al. A critical assessment of null hypothesis significance testing in quantitative communication research. Hum Commun Res 2008;34:171–87
- Nickerson RS. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol Methods 2000;5:241–301
- Bakker M, Wicherts JM. The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behav Res Methods 2011;43:666–78
- Berle D, Starcevic V. Inconsistencies between reported test statistics and p values in two psychiatry journals. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2007;16:202–7
- Garcia-Berthou E, Alcaraz C. Incongruence between test statistics and p values in medical papers. BMC Medl Res Methodol 2004;4:13
- Caperos JM, Pardo A. Consistency errors in p values reported in Spanish psychology journals. Psicothema 2013;25:408–14
- Bakker M, Wicherts JM. outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological research. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103360
- Leggett NC, Thomas NA, Loetscher T, Nicholls ME. The life of p:‘just significant’ results are on the rise. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2013;66:2303–9