Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates: Supresión contralateral de las emisiones otoacüsticas en recién nacidos

References

• Aidan D, Lestang P, Avan P, Bonfils P. Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOEs) in neonates. Acta Otolaryngol 1997; 117: 25–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Hood L J, Wen H, et al. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Hood L J, Hurley A, Wen H. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivo-cochlear system. Otolarynaol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110: 3–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R C, Matthies M L, Hammel D R, Demorest M E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 418–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfils P, Uziel A, Pujol R. Screening for auditory dysfunction in infants by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114: 887–890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Dumont A, Marie P, Fran¸ois M, Narcy P. Evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 186–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D, Kemp D T. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1994a; 15: 378–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass D, Kemp D T. The objective assessment of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Ear Hear 1994b; 15: 371–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns E M, Hoberg K A, Campbell S L. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1571–1575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvallo R MM, Befi D L. Efferent auditory system action estimated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children with speech language impairment] (port). Pré-Fono Rev Atua Cient 1998; 10: 26–29
   Google Scholar
• Collet L, Kemp D T, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Veuillet E, Bene J, Morgon A. Effects of contralateral white noise on click-evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system. Audiology 1992; 31: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comis S, Whitfield I. Influence of centrifugal pathways on unit activity in cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1968; 31: 62–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durante A S. A study of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions amplitude with contralateral noise in infants (port). Master's Dissertation, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brasil 2000
   Google Scholar
• Eby T L, Nadol J B. Postnatal growth of the human temporal bone: implications for cochlear implants in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 356–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol 1956; 19: 424–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A L, Collet L, Chéry-Croze S, Magnan J, Chays A. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in human. Brain Res 1995; 705: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A L, Collet L, Chéry-Croze S. Suppression of otoacoustic emissions is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1997; 109: 78–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granade L, Liogier X, Collet L. Contralateral suppression and stimulus rate effects on evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1997; 107: 83–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood L H, Berlin C I. Clinical applications of efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions. Preliminary program and registration book. American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention, American Academy of Audiology, Chicago 2000; Vol. 1: 88
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position Statement. Audiol Today 1994; 6: 6–9
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S. Otoacoustic emissions tests in neonatal hearing screening programs. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 482: 73–84
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa S, Morlet T, Mycheyl C, Morgon A, Collet L. Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: clinical implications. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 192–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa S, Micheyl C, Veuillet E, Collet L. Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs. Hear Res 1998; 121: 29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne-Rebillard M, Pujol R. Hair cell innervation in the fetal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1988; 105: 398–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letourneau K S, McDermott C, Vohr B R. Factors affecting maternal anxiety in a universal screen program. Preliminary program and registration book. American Academy of Audiology, Chicago 2000; Vol. 1: 110, American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention
   Google Scholar
• Liberman C M, Kujawa S G. The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic injury: acute and chronic effects. The efferent auditory system—basic science and clinical application, C I Berlin. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1999; 2–27
   Google Scholar
• Maison S, Mcheyl C, Chays A, Collet L. Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties in humans. Hear Res 1997; 113: 89–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlet T, Collet L, Salle B, Morgon A. Functional maturation of cochlear active mechanisms and of the medial olivo cochlear system in humans. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 271–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlet T, Perrin E, Durrant J D, et al. Development of cochlear active mechanisms in human differs between gender. Neurosci Lett 1996; 220: 49–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlet T, Goforth L, Hood L J, Ferber C, Duclaux R, Berlin C I. Development of human cochlear active mechanisms asymmetry: involvment of the medial olivocochlear system?. Hear Res 1999; 134: 153–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark M, Merlob P, Bresloff I, Olsha M, Attias J. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions inter-aural and gender differences in newborns. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1997; 8: 133–139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pialarissi P R. Otoacoustic emissions: a study of its registers with contralateral stimulation in normal hearing individuals and its application in retrocochlear diagnosis. Doctoral Thesis, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen G L. The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 1946; 84: 141–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan S, Kemp D T. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 94: 140–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan S, Piron J P. Functional maturation of the medial olivocochlear system in human neonates. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114: 485–489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahley T L, Nodar R H, Musiek F E. Efferent auditory system: structure and function. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1997
   Google Scholar
• Sato H, Sando I, Takahashi H. Sexual dimorphism and the development of the human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 111: 1037–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veuillet E, Duverdy-Bertholon F, Collet L. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1996; 93: 128–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warr W B, Guinan J J. Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti, two separate systems. Brain Res 1979; 173: 152–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar