Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid: Evaluación de un auxiliar auditivo de micrófono direccional adaptable

References

• Beck L. Assessment of directional hearing aid characteristics. J Audiol Acoust 1983; 22: 178–191
   Google Scholar
• Beranek L. L. Acoustics. McGraw-Hill Electrical and Electronic Engineering Series. McGraw Hill, New York 1954
   Google Scholar
• Borwick J. Microphones: technology and technique. Focal Press, Oxford 1990
   Google Scholar
• Christensep L. A. Signal-to-noise ratio loss and directional-microphone hearing aids. Semin Hear 2000; 21: 179–200
   Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C., Gilmore C. A. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear Hear 1987; 8: 119S–126S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C., Gilmore C., Pusakulich K. M. Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 198–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H. NAL-NL1: a new prescriptive fitting procedure for non-linear hearing aids. Hear J 1999; 52: 10–17
   Google Scholar
• Harris C. M. Acoustical measurements and noise control. McGraw-Hill, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins D. B., Yacullo W. S. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Dis 1984; 49: 278–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killion M., Schulien R., Christensen L. Real world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hear J 1998; 51: 24–26, 30, 32–36, 38
   Google Scholar
• Kuk F. K., Kollofski C., Brown S., Melum A., Rosenthal A. Use of a digital hearing aid with directional microphones in schoolaged children. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 535–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moncour J. P., Dirks D. Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. J Speech Hear Res 1967; 10: 186–195
   Google Scholar
• Mueller H. G., Killion M. C. An easy method for calculating the articulation index. Hear J 1990; 43: 14–17
   Google Scholar
• Nabelek A. K., Mason D. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 24: 375–383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen H., Ludvigsen C. Effects of hearing aids with directional microphones in different acoustic environments. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 217–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson M. J., Gellnet D., Sullivan J., Soli S. D. Norms for the hearing in noise test: the influence of spatial separation, hearing loss and English language experience on speech reception thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: S2385
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M. J., Soli S. D., Sullivan J. Development of a hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1985–99
   Google Scholar
• Pearsons K. S., Bennett R. L., Fidell S. Speech levels in various environments. Report to the Office of Resources and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, BBN Report # 3281. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge MA 1976
   Google Scholar
• Preves D. A. Directional microphone use in ITE hearing instruments. Hear Rev 1997; 4: 21–27
   Google Scholar
• Preves D. A., Sammeth C. A., Wynne M. K. Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 273–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pumford J. M., Seewald R. C., Scollie S., Jenstad L. M. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 23–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts T. A. Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear 2000a; 21: 194–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T. A. The impact of head and body angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids. Ear Hear 2000b; 21: 318–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T. A. Directivity quantification in hearing aids: fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear 2000c; 21: 45–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T. A., Dittberner A. B. Directional amplification for improved signal-to-noise ratio: strategies, measurement, and limitations. Strategies for selecting and verifying hearing aid fittings, M. Valente. Thieme, New York 2002; 274–345
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts T. A., Dahr S. Aided benefit across directional and omni-directional hearing aid microphones for behind-the-ear hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 180–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts T. A., Mueller H. G. Making sense of directional microphone performance. Am J Audiol 1999; 8: 117–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts T. A., Lindley G., Henry P. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 348–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald R., Cornelisse L., Ramji K., Sinclair S., Moodie K., Jamieson D. DSL v4.0 for Windows. Ontario: The University of Western Ontario, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Sung G. S., Sung R. J., Angelelli R. M. Directional microphones in hearing aids. Effects on speech discrimination in noise. Arch Otolaryngol 1975; 101: 316–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson S. C. Dual microphones or directional-plus-omni: Which is best?. High performance hearing solutions, S. Kochkin, K. E. Strom. Hear Rev Suppl. 1999; 3: 31–5
   Google Scholar
• Valente M., Fabry D., Potts L. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 440–449
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Buuren R. A., Festen J. M., Plomp R. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 211–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar