Examination of differences between successful and unsuccessful elderly hearing aid candidates matched for age, hearing loss and gender: Evaluación de las diferencias entre los candidatos exitosos y no exitosos de edad mayor, al uso de auxiliar auditivo por edad, grado de hipoacusia y sexo

References

• American National Standards Institute. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. American National Standards Institute. ANSI, New York 1991; S3.1: 1991
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Specifications far Audiometers. American National Standards Institute. ANSI, New York 1996; S3.6: 1996
   Google Scholar
• Becker M. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior, B. Slack Charles, Thorofare, NJ 1974
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R., Niebuhr D., Getta I, Anderson C. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 820–831
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Hnath-Chisholm T., Hanin L, Kishon-Rabin L. Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 306–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Parkinson A, Newall P. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 40–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmiel R., Jerger J. Hearing-aid use, central auditory processing disorder, and hearing handicap in elderly persons. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 190–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christopherson L. A., Humes L. E. Some psychometric properties of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC). J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 929–935
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demorest M., Erdman S. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 1987; 52: 129–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demorest M. E., Erdman S. A. Relest stability of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 237–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demorest M., Erdman S. Relationships among behavioral, environmental, and affective communication variables: a canonical analysis of the CPHI. J. Speech Hear Disord 1989a; 54: 180–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demorest M., Erdman S. Factor structure of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 1989b; 54: 541–549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erdman S., Demorest M. Adjustment to hearing impairment. l: Description of a heterogeneous clinical population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 107–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fino M. S., Bess F. H., Lichtenstein M. J., Logan S. A. Factors differentiating elderly hearing-aid wearers from non-wearers. Hear Instrum 1992; 43: 2–10
   Google Scholar
• Frank T., Richards W. D. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 221–227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franks J., Beckman N. Rejection of hearing aids: attitudes of a geriatric sample. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 161–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garstecki D. C., Erler S. F. Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 28–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garstecki D. C., Erler S. F. Hearing loss, control, and demographic factors influencing hearing aid use among older adults. J Speed, Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 527–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L. E. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 161–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. E., Barlow N. N., Garner C. B., Wilson D. L. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43: 879–892
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. E., Christopherson L. Speech-identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory-processing deficits. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 686–693
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. E., Coughlin M, Talley L. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 1: 419–427
   Google Scholar
• Humes L. E., Garner C. B., Wilson D. L., Barlow N. N. Hearingaid outcome measures following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 469–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L. E., Watson B. U., Christensen L. A., Cokely C. G., Hailing D. C. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1994; 37: 465–474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. MarkeTrak III: why 20 million in US don't use hearing aids for their hearing loss. Hear J. 1993; 46: 26–31
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. MarkeTrak IV: 10-year trends in the hearing aid market—has anything changed?. Hear J. 1996; 49: 23–34
   Google Scholar
• Krantz D. S., Baum A, Wideman M. V. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Person Social Psychol 1980; 39: 977–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F. N., Champlin C. A., Chambers J. A. Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 95–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathiowetz V., Weber K., Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 1985; 5(1): 24–38
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F. E. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 265–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noffsinger D., Wilson R. H., Musiek F. E. Department of Veterans Affairs Compact Disc (VA-CD) recording for auditory perceptual assessment: background and introduction. J Am Acad Audiol 1994a; 5: 231–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noffsinger D., Martinez C., Wilson R. H. Dichotic listening to speech: background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol 1994b; 5: 248–254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noh S., Gagne J.-P., Kaspar V. Models of health behaviors and compliance: applications to audiological rehabilitation research. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1994; 27(Monograph Suppl): 375–389
   Google Scholar
• Ventry I., Weinstein B. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 128–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallston B. S., Wallston K. A., Kaplan G. O., Maides S. A. Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 1976; 44: 580–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobsbaum A., Wark D. J., Boheme M. Psychometric characteristics of a paper pencil administration of the HHIE. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Audiology. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Watson C. S. Uncertainty, informational masking, and the capacity of immediate auditory memory. Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds, W. A. Yost, C. S. Watson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1987; 267–277
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. The Psychological Corporation, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R. H., Piece J. P., Salmon D. L., Sperry J. L., Bornstein S. P. Effects of time compression plus reverberation on the intelligibility of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 269–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar