References
- American National Standards Institute. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. American National Standards Institute. ANSI, New York 1991; S3.1: 1991
- American National Standards Institute. Specifications far Audiometers. American National Standards Institute. ANSI, New York 1996; S3.6: 1996
- Becker M. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior, B. Slack Charles, Thorofare, NJ 1974
- Bentler R., Niebuhr D., Getta I, Anderson C. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 820–831
- Boothroyd A., Hnath-Chisholm T., Hanin L, Kishon-Rabin L. Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 306–312
- Byrne D., Parkinson A, Newall P. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 40–49
- Chmiel R., Jerger J. Hearing-aid use, central auditory processing disorder, and hearing handicap in elderly persons. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 190–202
- Christopherson L. A., Humes L. E. Some psychometric properties of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC). J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 929–935
- Demorest M., Erdman S. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 1987; 52: 129–143
- Demorest M. E., Erdman S. A. Relest stability of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 237–242
- Demorest M., Erdman S. Relationships among behavioral, environmental, and affective communication variables: a canonical analysis of the CPHI. J. Speech Hear Disord 1989a; 54: 180–188
- Demorest M., Erdman S. Factor structure of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 1989b; 54: 541–549
- Erdman S., Demorest M. Adjustment to hearing impairment. l: Description of a heterogeneous clinical population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 107–122
- Fino M. S., Bess F. H., Lichtenstein M. J., Logan S. A. Factors differentiating elderly hearing-aid wearers from non-wearers. Hear Instrum 1992; 43: 2–10
- Frank T., Richards W. D. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 221–227
- Franks J., Beckman N. Rejection of hearing aids: attitudes of a geriatric sample. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 161–166
- Garstecki D. C., Erler S. F. Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 28–42
- Garstecki D. C., Erler S. F. Hearing loss, control, and demographic factors influencing hearing aid use among older adults. J Speed, Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 527–537
- Humes L. E. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 161–167
- Humes L. E., Barlow N. N., Garner C. B., Wilson D. L. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43: 879–892
- Humes L. E., Christopherson L. Speech-identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory-processing deficits. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 686–693
- Humes L. E., Coughlin M, Talley L. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 1: 419–427
- Humes L. E., Garner C. B., Wilson D. L., Barlow N. N. Hearingaid outcome measures following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 469–486
- Humes L. E., Watson B. U., Christensen L. A., Cokely C. G., Hailing D. C. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1994; 37: 465–474
- Kochkin S. MarkeTrak III: why 20 million in US don't use hearing aids for their hearing loss. Hear J. 1993; 46: 26–31
- Kochkin S. MarkeTrak IV: 10-year trends in the hearing aid market—has anything changed?. Hear J. 1996; 49: 23–34
- Krantz D. S., Baum A, Wideman M. V. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Person Social Psychol 1980; 39: 977–990
- Martin F. N., Champlin C. A., Chambers J. A. Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 95–104
- Mathiowetz V., Weber K., Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 1985; 5(1): 24–38
- Musiek F. E. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 265–268
- Noffsinger D., Wilson R. H., Musiek F. E. Department of Veterans Affairs Compact Disc (VA-CD) recording for auditory perceptual assessment: background and introduction. J Am Acad Audiol 1994a; 5: 231–235
- Noffsinger D., Martinez C., Wilson R. H. Dichotic listening to speech: background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol 1994b; 5: 248–254
- Noh S., Gagne J.-P., Kaspar V. Models of health behaviors and compliance: applications to audiological rehabilitation research. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1994; 27(Monograph Suppl): 375–389
- Ventry I., Weinstein B. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 128–134
- Wallston B. S., Wallston K. A., Kaplan G. O., Maides S. A. Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 1976; 44: 580–585
- Hobsbaum A., Wark D. J., Boheme M. Psychometric characteristics of a paper pencil administration of the HHIE. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Audiology. 1999
- Watson C. S. Uncertainty, informational masking, and the capacity of immediate auditory memory. Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds, W. A. Yost, C. S. Watson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1987; 267–277
- Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. The Psychological Corporation, New York 1981
- Wilson R. H., Piece J. P., Salmon D. L., Sperry J. L., Bornstein S. P. Effects of time compression plus reverberation on the intelligibility of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 269–277