Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry in a general adult population in Sweden: Emisiones otoacústicas y timpanometría en la población general adulta de Suecia

References

• Förfallningssamling Arbetarskyddsstyrelsens. Buller Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen kungörelse med föreskrifter om buller samt allmänna råd om lillämpningen av förcskrifter. AFS 2000. Publikationsservice, Solna 2000; 15
   Google Scholar
• Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D., Elbez M., Erminy M. Transientevoked otoacoustie emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3012–3020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli S., Probst R. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 286–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicknell M., Morgan N. A clinical evaluation of the Zwislocki acoustic bridge. J Laryngol Otol 1968; 82: 673–691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Matthies M.L., Hammel D.R., Demorest M.E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 418–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfils P., Uaziel A. Clinical applications of evoked acoustic emissions: results in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 326–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks D. Electroacoustic impedance bridge studies on normal ears of children. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 247–253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke K., Nilges T., Henry G. Middle ear impedance measurements. J Speech Hear Res 1970; 13: 317–325
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns E.M., Hoberg Archarts K., Cambell S.L. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1571–1575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Otoacoustic emissions: measurement, data and interrelations. Acta Acustica 1998; 84: 320–328
   Google Scholar
• Chung D.Y., Mason K., Gannon R.P., Willson G.N. The ear effect as function of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 1277–1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L., Gartner M., Moulin A., Kauffmann I., Disant F., et al. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 1060–1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai A., Reed D., Cheyne A., Richards S., Prasher D. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health 1999; 2: 58–65
   Google Scholar
• Dorn P.A., Piskorski P., Keefe D.H., Neely S.T., Gorga M.P. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(2)964–971
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engdahl B. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trøndelag, Norway: I. Distributions by age, gender, and ear side. Int J Audiol 2002a; 41: 64–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trøndelag, Norway: II. Effects of noise, head injuries, and ear infections. Int J Audiol 2002b; 41: 78–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B., Woxen O., Arnesen A.R., Mair T.W.S. Transient evoked Otoacoustic emissions as screening for hearing losses at the school for military training. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 71–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman A.S. Acoustic impedance studies of the normal ear. J Speech Hear Res 1967; 10: 165–176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson M.A., Smith P.A., Davis A.C., Lutman M.E. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years. Audiology 2000; 39: 125–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaskill S.A., Brown A.M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2fl-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates G.A., Mills D., Nam B., D'agostino R., Rubel E.W. Effects of age on the distortion product otoacoustic emission growth functions. Hear Res 2002; 163: 53–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein J.L. Auditory nonlinearity. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 41: 676–689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Bergman B., Beauchaine K.L., Kaminski J.R., et al. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 2050–2060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Ohlrich B., Hoover B., Redner J., et al. From laboratory to clinic: a large seale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 440–455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandori F., Ravazzani P. Non-linearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived non-linear technique. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W. Effects of age and sex on static compliance. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105: 153–156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall J.W., Baer J.E., Chase P.A., Schwaber M.K. Clinical application of otoacoustic emissions: what do we know about factors influencing measurement and analysis?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110: 22–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W., III, Chandler D. Tympanometry in clinical audiology. Handbook of Clinical Audiology 4th edn., J. Katz. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 283–299
   Google Scholar
• Harris F.P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 594–600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris F.P., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Stagner B.B., Coats A.C., Martin G.K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hergils L., Magnusson B. Morning pressure in middle ear. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 111: 86–89
   Google Scholar
• Hergils L., Magnusson B., Falk B. Different tympanometric procedures compared with direct pressure measurements in healthy ears. Scand Audiol 1990; 19: 183–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz M.A., Probst R., Harris P.P., Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 478–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics Audiometric Test Methods—Part 1: Basic Pure tone Air and Bone Conduction Threshold Audiometry. ISO 8253-1. ISO., Geneva 1989
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment Part 2. Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Insert Earphones. ISO 389-2. ISO., Geneva 1994
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S., Mauldin L. Studies in impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1972; 96: 513–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M., Arlinger S. The development of noise-induced hearing loss in the Swedish County of Östergötland in the 1980s and the 1990s. Noise Health 2001; 3: 15–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson M., Arlinger S. Hearing threshold levels for an otologically unscreened, non-occupationally noise-exposed population in Sweden. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 180–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M., Arlinger S. Prevalence of hearing impairment in a population in Sweden. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 18–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlzon R.K., Garcia P., Peterein J.L., Gates G.A. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the elderly. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 596–605
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D.T. Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes. Hear Res 1980; 2: 533–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT., Ryan S., Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa S., Micheyl C., Veuillet E., Collet L. Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs. Hear Res 1998; 121: 29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa S., Morlet T., Micheyl C., Morgon A., Collet L. Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: clinical implications. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 192–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberley B.P., Nelson D.A. Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. J Otolaryngol 1989; 18: 365–369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konradsson K.S., Svensson O., Grenner J. Tympanic pressure gradient and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 403–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryter K.D. The Effects of Noise on Man. Academic Press., New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Lepage E.L., Murray N.M. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 588–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind O., Randa J.S. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: incidence and short-time variability in normal ears. J Otolaryngol 1990; 19: 252–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B.L., McCoy M.J., Whitehead M.L., Martin G.K. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 11–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H., Heller J.W. Screening tympanometry: criteria for medical referral. Audiology 1987; 26: 197–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin G.K., Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Otoacoustic emissions in human ears: normative findings. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 106–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills D.M. Origin and implications of two 'components' in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic Emissions: Basic Science and Clinical Applications, C.I. Berlin. Singular Publishing, London 1998; 85–104
   Google Scholar
• Moulin A., Collet L., Veuillet E., Morgan A. Interrelations between acoustic distortion products, transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 65: 216–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray N.M., Lepage E.L. Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions and apparent rates of ageing of the inner ear in an Australian population. Aust J Audiol 1993; 15: 59–70
   Google Scholar
• Pirilä T., Jounio-Ervasti K., Sorri M. Hearing asymmetry among left-handed and right-handed persons in a random population. Scand Audiol 1991a; 20: 223–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirilä T., Sorri M., Jounio-Ervasti K., Sipilä P., Karjalainen H. Hearing asymmetry among occupationally noise-exposed men and women under 60 years of age. Scand Audiol 1991b; 20: 217–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R., Lonsbury-Marlin B.L., Martin G.K., Coast A.C. Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 1987; 8: 73–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravazzani P., Tognola G., Grandori F. Derived nonlinear versus linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1996; 35: 73–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S., Abdala C. Otoacoustic emissions for the study of auditory function in infants and children. Otoacoustic Emissions; Basic Science and Clinical Applications, C.I. Berlin. Singular Publishing, London 1998; 105–125
   Google Scholar
• Smith P.A., Davis A., Ferguson M., Lutman M.E. The prevalence and type of social noise exposure in young adults in England. Noise Health 2000; 6: 41–56
   Google Scholar
• Sweden Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Sweden. Statistics Sweden, Örebro 2001; Vol. 87
   Google Scholar
• Stover L., Norton S.J. The effect of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2670–2681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse A.L., Ochs M.T., Hall J.W. Evidence against the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 339–345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton L.A., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Whitehead M.L. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994; 75: 161–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Murphy W.J., Tubis A. New offline method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear Res 1993; 71: 170–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trine M.B., Hirsch J.E., Margolis R.H. The effect of middle car pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 401–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M.L., Stagner B.B., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Measurement of otoacoustic emissions for hearing assessment. IEEE Engng Med Biol 1994; 13: 210–226
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead M.L., Stagner B.B., McCoy M.J., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Dependence of distorsion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1, L2 space. J Acoust Soc Am 1995a; 97: 2359–2377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M.L., McCoy M.J., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Dependence of distorsion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears, I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Am 1995b; 97: 2346–2358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley T.L., Cruickshanks K.J., Nondahl D.M., Tweed T.S., Klein R., et al. Tympanometric measures in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 260–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwislocki J. Analysis of middle ear function. Part I: Input impedance. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1514–1523
   Google Scholar