Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos

References

• Anderson T W. An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Andrade J, Sapsford D J, Jeevaratnum D, Pickworth A J, Jones J G. The coherent frequency in the electroencephalogram as an objective measure of cognitive function during propofol sedation. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1279–1284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Fuse T, Suzuki T, Kim Y, Koike Y. An application of phase spectral analysis to amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1993a; 504: 82–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y, Suzuki Y, Fuse T, Koike Y. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993b; 65: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y, Suzuki Y, Fuse T, Koike Y. Frequency specificity of amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase spectral analysis. Audiology 1993c; 32: 293–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Furuse H. Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994a; 511: 15–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Furuse H, Yokota M, Kiren T, Suzuki Y, Koike Y. Detectability of amplitude-modulation following response at different carrier frequencies. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994b; 511: 23–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Furuse H. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994c; 511: 7–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Yokota M, Furuse H, Watanabe T, Ito T. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 28–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold S, Burkard R. The auditory evoked potential difference tone and cubic difference tone measured from the inferior colliculus of the chincilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 1565–1573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azzena G B, Conti G, Santarelli R, Ottaviani F, Paludetti G, Maurizi M. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRS). I: Stimulus rate effects. Hear Res 1995; 83: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barajas J J, Fernandez R, Bernal M R. Middle latency and 40 Hz auditory evoked responses in normal hearing children: 500 Hz thresholds. Scand Audiol Suppl 1988; 30: 99–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basar E, Rosen B, Basar-Eroglu C, Greitschus F. The associations between 40 Hz-EEG and the middle latency response of the auditory evoked potential. Int J Neurosci 1987; 33: 103–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basar-Eroglu C, Struber D, Schurmann M, Stadler M, Basar E. Gamma-band responses in the brain: a short review of psychophysiological correlates and functional significance. Int J Psychophysiol 1996; 24: 101–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra R, Kuwada S, Maher V L. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 167–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijl G K, Veringa F. Neural conduction time and steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 465–467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bocttcher F A, Poth E A, Mills J H, Dubno J R. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res 2001; 153: 32–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonhomme V, Fiset P, Meuret P. Propofol anesthesia and cerebral blood flow changes elicited by vibrotactile stimulation: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol 2001; 85: 1299–1308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borda R P. The 40/sec middle-latency auditory response in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and age-matched normals. PhD thesis, University of Houston, Houston. 1984
   Google Scholar
• Brillinger D R. Time series: data analysis and theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Campbell F W, Atkinson J, Francis M R, Green D M. Estimation of auditory thresholds using evoked potentials. A clinical screening test. Prog Clin Neurophysiol 1977; 2: 68–78
   Google Scholar
• Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wernccke K D. Objective detection of amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology 2001; 40: 245–252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chambers R D, Meyer T A. Reliability of threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults using the AMFR. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 22–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Champlin C A. Method for detecting auditory steady-state potentials recorded from humans. Hear Res 1992; 58: 63–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatrian G E, Petersen M C, Lazarte J A. Responses to clicks from the human brain: some depth electrographic observations. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1960; 12: 479–489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chertoff M E, Hecox K E. Auditory nonlinearities measured with auditory-evoked potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 1248–1254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertoff M E, Hecox K E, Goldstein R. Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 157–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciulla C, Takeda T, Morabito M, Endo H, Kumagai T, Xiao R. MEG measurements of 40 Hz auditory evoked response in human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1996; 47: 121–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen L T, Rickards F W, Clark G M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B, Dowell R C, Tomlin D, Rance G, Ming W J. The auditory steady-state response: I Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002a; 13: 173–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B, Parker J, Swiderski N, Rickards F. The auditory steady-state response: II. Full-term and premature neonates. J Am Acad Audiol 2002b; 13: 260–269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B, Rickards F, Poulis C, Parker J, Tan L, Pollard J. The auditory steady-state response: III Clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002c; 13: 270–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conti G, Santarelli R, Ottaviani F, Azzena G B. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses. Monitoring of stimulus-induced 40Hz brain oscillations, G. Litscher. Pabst Science Publishers, Scottsdale 1998; 84–107
   Google Scholar
• Conti G, Santarelli R, Grassi C, Ottaviani F, Azzena G B. Auditory steady-state responses to click trains from the rat temporal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooley J W, Tukey J W. An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math Comput 1965; 19: 297–301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauman R, Szyfter W, Charlet de Sauvage R, Cazals Y. Low frequency thresholds assessed with 40 Hz MLR in adults with impaired hearing. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1984; 240: 85–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diamond A L. Latency of the steady state visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1977; 42: 125–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A, John M S, van Roon P, Picton T W. Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 100–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A, John M S, van Roon P. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Auditory responses to the envelopes of pseudorandom noise stimuli in humans. Hear Res 1988; 36: 9–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 2–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Optimal smoothing of coherence estimates. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 194–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 516–524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Objective detection of 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994a; 92: 405–413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Phase weighting: a method to improve objective detection of steady-state evoked potentials. Hear Res 1994b; 79: 94–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Objective versus human observer detection of 40-Hz auditory-evoked potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1995a; 97: 3042–3050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Comparison of objective threshold estimation procedures for 40-Hz auditory evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995b; 16: 299–310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 2236–2246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: effects of rate and sedation on detectability. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 3482–3488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F. Auditory evoked responses to amplitude modulated stimuli consisting of multiple envelope components. J Comp Physiol A 1996; 179: 113–121
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F. The envelope following response to multiple tone pair stimuli. Hear Res 1997; 110: 1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Mountain D C. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 3215–3226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Chertoff M E, Burkard R. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2225–2234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Au W WL, Nachtigall P E, Pawloski J. Modulation rate transfer functions to low-frequency carriers in three species of cetaceans. J Comp Physiol A 1995; 177: 235–245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumermuth G, Molinari L. Spectral analysis of EEG background activity. Methods of analysis of brain electrical and magnetic signals, A. S. Gevins, A. Remond. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1987; 85–130
   Google Scholar
• Dutton R C, Smith W D, Rampil I J, Chortkoff B S, Eger E I. Forty-Hertz midlatency auditory evoked potential activity predicts wakeful response during desflurane and propofol anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1209–1220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eggermont J J. Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code. Hear Res 2001; 157: 1–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Wahlgreen O. Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 89–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasti H. The hearing sensation roughness and neuronal responses to AM-tones. Hear Res 1990; 46: 293–295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firsching R. The brain-stem and 40 Hz middle latency auditory evoked potentials in brain death. Acta Neurochir 1989; 101: 52–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firsching R, Luther J, Eidelberg E, Brown W E, Jr, Story J L, Boop F A. 40 Hz-middle latency auditory evoked response in comatose patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 67: 213–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher R A. Tests of significance in harmonic analysis. Proc R Soc Lond 1929; 125: 54–59
   Google Scholar
• Fisher N I. Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993
   Google Scholar
• Franowicz M N, Barth D S. Comparison of evoked potentials and high-frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in rat auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 1995; 74: 96–112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fridman J, Zappulla R, Bergelson M. Application of phase spectral analysis for brain stem auditory evoked potential detection in normal subjects and patients with posterior fossa tumors. Audiology 1984; 23: 99–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Nicolet Potentials 1981; 1: 12
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R. A comparison of certain gamma band (40-Hz) brain rhythms in cat and man. Induced rhythms in the brain, E. Basar, T. H. Bullock. Birkhäuser, Boston 1992; 201–216
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Makeig S. Dynamic changes in steady-state potentials. Dynamics of sensory and cognitive processing of the brain, E. Basar. Springer, Berlin 1988; 178–199
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Makeig S. Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40-Hz steady-state response. J Acoust Soc Am 1992a; 92: 2683–2690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Makeig S. Physiological studies of central masking in man. II: Tonepip SSRS and the masking level difference. J Acoust Soc Am 1992b; 92: 2691–2697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff P J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler C D. Average responses to clicks in man recorded by scalp electrodes. Technical Report 380. MIT Research Laboratories of Electronics, Cambridge 1960
   Google Scholar
• Gilron I, Plourde G, Marcantoni W, Varin F. 40 Hz auditory steady-state response and EEG spectral edge frequency during sufentanil anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 115–121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giraud A L, Lorenzi C, Ashburner J. Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 1588–1598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein J L, Baer T, Kiang N YS. A theoretical treatment of latency, group delay, and tuning characteristics for auditory-nerve responses to clicks and tones. Physiology of the auditory system; based on the proceedings of a workshop, M. B. Sachs. National Educational Consultants, Baltimore 1971; 133–141
   Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Thornton A R. The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 217–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Beauchaine K A, Reiland J K. Comparison of onset and steady-state responses of hearing aids: implications for the use of the auditory brainslem response in the selection of hearing aids. J Speech Hear 1987; 30: 130–136
   Google Scholar
• Green G G, Kay R H, Rees A. Responses evoked by frequency-modulated sounds recorded from the human scalp. J Physiol 1979; 296: 21P–22P
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths S K, Chambers R D. The amplitude modulation-following response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 235–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutschalk A, Mase R, Roth R. Dcconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 110: 856–868
   Google Scholar
• Hall J W. Auditory brainstem frequency following responses to waveform envelope periodicity. Science 1979; 205: 1297–1299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harada J, Aoyagi M, Suzuki T, Kiren T, Koike Y. A study on the phase spectral analysis of middle latency response and 40-Hz event-related potential in central nervous system disorders. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994; 511: 34–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hari R, Hämäläinen M, Joutsiniemi S L. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1033–1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A T, Stapells D R. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A T, Lins O, Van Roon P, Stapells D R, Scherg M, Picton T W. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topography 2002a; 15: 69–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A T, Picton T W, Stapells D R. Place specificity of auditory steady state responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002b; 112: 1569–1582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A T, Stapells D R. Auditory steady state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 2003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hink R F, Kodera K, Yamada O, Kaga K, Suzuki J. Binaural interaction of a beating frequency-following response. Audiology 1980; 19: 36–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan K. 40 Hz steady-state evoked potentials (SSEP) during isoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: A402
   Google Scholar
• Hoke M, Ross B, Wickesbcrg R, Lütkenhöner B. Weighted averaging -theory and application to electric response audiometry. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 57: 484–489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hotelling H. The generalization of student's ratio. Ann Math Statist 1931; 2: 360–378
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson A, Wennberg A. Visual evaluation and computer analysis of the EEG—a comparison. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 38: 79–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Chmiel R, Frost J D, Jr, Coker N. Effect of sleep on the auditory steady state evoked potential. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 240–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Chmiel R, Glaze D, Frost J D, Jr. Rate and filter dependence of the middle-latency response in infants. Audiology 1987; 26: 269–283
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M S, Picton T W. Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements. Hear Res 2000a; 141: 57–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M S, Picton T W. MASTER: a windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000b; 61: 125–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M S, Lins O G, Boucher B L, Picton T W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M S, Dimitrijevic A, Picton T W. Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2001a; 112: 555–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M S, Dimitrijevic A, van Roon P, Picton T W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 2001b; 6: 12–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John E R, Prichep L S, Kox W. Invariant reversible qEEG effects of anesthetics. Consciousness Cognition 2001c; 10: 165–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M S, Dimitrijevic A, Picton T W. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 2002a; 23: 106–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M S, Purcell D W, Dimitrijevic A, Picton T W. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 2002b; 13: 246–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson B W, Weinberg H, Ribary U, Cheyne D O, Ancill R. Topographic distribution of the 40 Hz auditory evoked-related potential in normal and aged subjects. Brain Topogr 1988; 1: 117–121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kankkunen A, Rosenhall U. Comparison between thresholds obtained with pure-tone audiometry and the 40-Hz middle latency response. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 99–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmos G, Mäkelä J P, Ulbert I, Winkler I. Evidence for intracortical generation of the auditory 40-Hz response in the cat. New developments in event-related potentials, H. J. Heinze, T. F. Münte, G. R. Mangun. Birkhäuser, Boston 1993; 87–93
   Google Scholar
• Khanna S M, Teich M C. Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to amplitude-modulated signals. Hear Res 1989a; 39: 143–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khanna S M, Teich M C. Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to frequency-modulated signals. Hear Res 1989b; 39: 159–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kileny P, Shea S L. Middle-latency and 40-Hz auditory evoked responses in normal-hearing subjects: click and 500-Hz thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 20–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiren T, Aoyagi M, Furuse H, Koike Y. An experimental study on the generator of amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994; 511: 28–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein A J. Properties of the brain-stem response slow-wave component. I. Latency, amplitude and threshold sensitivity. Arch Otolaryngol 1983a; 109: 6–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A J. Properties of the brain-stem response slow-wave component. II. Frequency specificity. Arch Otolaryngol 1983b; 109: 74–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight R D, Kemp D T. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1, f2 area study. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 457–473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna B S, Semple M N. Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 255–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan A, Parkinson J. Human frequency-following response: representation of tonal sweeps. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5: 312–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulli J, Koch C. Does anesthesia cause loss of consciousness?. Trends Neurosci 1991; 14: 6–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher V L. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986; 21: 179–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner G, Schreiner C E. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 1988; 60: 1799–1822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann D, Michel C M. Intracerebral dipole sources of EEG FFT power maps. Brain Topogr 1989; 2: 155–T64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann D, Michel C M. Intracerebral dipole source localization for FFT power maps. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 76: 271–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenarz T, Gulzow J, Grozinger M, Hoth S. Clinical evaluation of 40-Hz middle-latency responses in adults: frequency specific threshold estimation and suprathreshold amplitude characteristics. Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec ORL 1986; 48: 24–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi E C, Folsom R C, Dobie R A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi E C, Folsom R C, Dobie R A. Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults. Hear Res 1995; 89: 21–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden R D, Campbell K B, Hamel G, Picton T W. Human auditory steady state evoked potentials during sleep. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 167–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden R D, Picton T W, Hamel G, Campbell K B. Human auditory steady state evoked potentials during selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 145–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton T W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton P E, Picton T W, Champagne S C, Durieux-Smith A. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80–110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3051–3063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton T W, Boucher B L. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucertini M, Ciniglio Appiani G, Antonini R, Urbani L. Effects of hypobaric hypoxia on the middle-latency and steady-state auditory evoked potentials. Audiology 1993; 32: 356–362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucertini M, Verde P, De Santis S. Human auditory steady-state responses during repeated exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. Audiol Neurootol 2002; 7: 107–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lütkenhöner B. Frequency-domain localization of intracerebral dipolar sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 82: 112–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lütkenhöner B, Hoke M, Pantev C. Possibilities and limitations of weighted averaging. Biol Cybern 1985; 52: 409–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn J M, Lesner S A, Sandridge S A, Daddario C C. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 366–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madler C, Pöppel E. Auditory evoked potentials indicate the loss of neuronal oscillations during general anaesthesia. Naturwissenschaftcn 1987; 74: 42–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madler C, Keller L, Schwender D, Pöppel E. Sensory information processing during general anaesthesia: effect of isoflurane on auditory evoked neuronal oscillations. Br J Anaesth 1991; 66: 81–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maiste A, Picton T. Human auditory evoked potentials to frequency-modulated tones. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makeig S, Galambos R. The CERP: event-related perturbations in steady-state responses. Brain dynamics: progress and perspectives, E. Basar. Springer, Berlin 1989; 373–400
   Google Scholar
• Makeig S, Müller M M, Rockstroh B. Effects of voluntary movements on early auditory brain responses. Exp Brain Res 1996; 110: 487–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä J P, Hari R. Evidence for cortical origin of the 40 Hz auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 539–546
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mäkelä J P, Karmos G, Molnar M, Csepe V, Winkler I. Steady-state responses from the cat auditory cortex. Hear Res 1990; 45: 41–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardia K V. Statistics of directional data. Academic Press, New York 1972
   Google Scholar
• Mardia K V, Kent J T, Bibby J M. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Mauer G, Döring W H. Generators of amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Paper presented at 16th meeting of the Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group, TromsøNorway 1999
   Google Scholar
• Maurizi M, Almadori G, Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Rosignoli M, Luciano R. 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children. Audiology 1990; 29: 322–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAnally K I, Stein J F. Scalp potentials evoked by amplitude modulated tones in dyslexia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 939–945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee T, Kraus N. Auditory development reflected by middle latency response. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 419–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee T, Kraus N, Killion M, Rosenberg R, King C. Improving the reliability of the auditory middle latency response by monitoring EEG delta activity. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 76–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meuret P, Backman S B, Bonhomme V, Plourde G, Fiset P. Physostigmine reverses propofol-induced unconsciousness and attenuation of the auditory steady state response and bispectral index in human volunteers. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 708–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milford C A, Birchall J P. Steady-state auditory evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones in hearing-impaired subjects. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 137–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B C, Glasberg B R. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1093–1101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moushcgian G, Rupert A L, Stillman R D. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 665–667
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muchnik C, Katz-Putter H, Rubinstein M, Hildesheimer M. Normative data for 40-Hz event-related potentials to 500-Hz tonal stimuli in young and elderly subjects. Audiology 1993; 32: 27–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munglani R, Andrade J, Sapsford D J, Baddeley A, Jones J G. A measure of consciousness and memory during isoflurane administration: the coherent frequency. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71: 633–641
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norcia A M, Tyler C W, Hamer R D, Wesemann W. Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP. Vision Res 1989; 29: 627–637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P, Stapells D R. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. II. Derived response analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 3609–3619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaskas C W, Wilson M J, Dobie R A. Electrophysiologic assessment of low-frequency hearing: sedation effects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 101: 434–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantev C, Elbert T, Makeig S, Hampson S, Eulitz C, Hoke M. Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 389–396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantev C, Roberts L E, Elbert T, Ross B, Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 1996; 101: 62–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker D, Matsebula D. The period evoked potential: objective response detection and 500 Hz thresholds in normally hearing adults. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 167–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker D, O'Dwyer D. The 40 Hz modulation-following response: prediction of low-frequency uncomfortable loudness levels in normally hearing adults. Audiology 1998; 37: 372–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M C, Savio G, Torres A, Martin V, Rodriguéz E, Galan L. Steady slate responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 200–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pethe J, Hocke T, Müller R, von Specht H. On the frequency spectrum of amplitude modulation following responses. Scand Audiol 2000; 29: 191–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pethe J, Von Specht H, Mühler R, Hocke T. Amplitude modulation following responses in awake and sleeping humans—a comparison for 40 Hz and 80 Hz modulation frequency. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 152–155
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W. The strategy of evoked potential audiometry. Early diagnosis of hearing loss, S. E. Gerber, G. T. Mencher. Grune and Stratton, New York 1978; 297–307
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W. Human auditory steady state responses. Evoked potentials III, C. Barber, T. Blum. Butterworth, Boston 1987; 117–124
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Rodriguez R T, Linden R D, Maiste A C. The neurophysiology of human hearing. Human Communication Canada 1985; 9: 127–136
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Vajsar J, Rodriguez R, Campbell K B. Reliability estimates for steady state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987a; 68: 119–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T W, Dauman R, Aran J-M. Réponses évoquées en 'régime permanent' chez l'homme par la modulation sinusoidale de fréquence. J Otolaryngol 1987b; 16: 140–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T W, Skinner C R, Champagne S C, Kellett A J, Maiste A C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987c; 82: 165–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne S C. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 315–331
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T W, Dimitrijevic A, John M S, van Roon P. The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1692–1711
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Dimitrijevic A, John M S. Multiple auditory steady-state responses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002a; 111(suppl 189): 16–21
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Dimitrijevic A, Van Roon P, John M S, Reed M, Finklestein H. Possible roles for the auditory steady-state responses in fitting hearing aids. A sound foundation through early amplification 2001 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference, R. C. Seewald, J. S. Gravel. Phonak AG, Basel 2002b; 63–73
   Google Scholar
• Plourde G. The effects of propofol on the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response and on the electroencephalogram in humans. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1015–1022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plourde G. Auditory evoked potentials and 40-Hz oscillations. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1187–1189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plourde G, Picton T W. Human auditory steady state responses during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 460–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde G, Villemure C. Comparison of the effects of enflurane/N2O on the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response versus the auditory middle-latency response. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 75–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde G, Stapells D R, Picton T W. The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1991; 491: 153–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plourde G, Baribeau J, Bonhomme V. Ketamine increases the amplitude of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in humans. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 524–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde G, Villemure C, Fiset P, Bonhomme V, Backman S B. Effect of isoflurane on the auditory steady-state response and on consciousness in human volunteers. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 844–851
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poon P W, Chiu T W. Similarities of FM and AM receptive space of single units at the auditory midbrain. Biosystems 2000; 58: 229–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popov V V, Supin A Y, Klishin V O. Frequency tuning curves of the dolphin's hearing: envelope-following response study. J Comp Physiol [A] 1996; 178: 571–578
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purcell D W, John M S, Picton T W. Concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady state evoked potentials. Hear Res 2003; 176: 128–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G, Briggs R JS. Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111(suppl 189): 22–28
   Google Scholar
• Rance G, Rickards F. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 236–245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G, Rickards F W, Cohen L T, Burton M J, Clark G M. Steady state evoked potentials: a new tool for the accurate assessment of hearing in cochlear implant candidates. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 48: 44–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G, Rickards F W, Cohen L T, De Vidi S, Clark G M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G, Dowell R C, Rickards F W, Beer D E, Clark G M. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 48–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G, Beer D E, Cone-Wesson B. Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 238–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayleigh L. On the resultant of a large number of vibrations of the same pitch and arbitrary phase. Phil Mag 1880; 10: 73–78
   Google Scholar
• Rees A, Green G G, Kay R H. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res 1986; 23: 123–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966; 20: 238–248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Rapid objective refraction using evoked brain potentials. Invest Opthalmol 1973; 12: 669–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Latencies of evoked potentials to flicker and to pattern speedily estimated by simultaneous method. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 40: 654–660
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Evoked potentials in basic and clinical research. EEG informatics: a didactic review of methods and applications of EEG data processing, A. Rémond. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1977; 319–346
   Google Scholar
• Regan D. Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989
   Google Scholar
• Regan M P. Linear half-wave rectification of modulated sinusoids. Appl Math Comput 1994a; 62: 61–79
   Google Scholar
• Regan M P. A method for calculating the spectral response of a hair cell to a pure tone. Biol Cybern 1994b; 71: 13–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D, Heron J R. Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1969; 32: 479–483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan M P, Regan D. A frequency domain technique for characterizing nonlinearities in biological systems. J Theor Biol 1988; 133: 293–317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan M P, Regan D. Nonlinear terms produced by passing amplitude-modulated sinusoids through a hair cell transducer function. Biol Cybern 1993; 69: 439–446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rei G, Fu B T. Diagnostic significance of the staggered spondaic word test and 40-Hz auditory event-related potentials. Audiology 1988; 27: 8–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribary U, Loannides A A, Singh K D. Magnetic field tomography of coherent thalamocortical 40-Hz oscillations in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 11037–11041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rickards F W, Clark G M. Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. Evoked potentials II, R. H. Nodar, C. Barber. Butterworth, Boston, MA 1984; 163–168
   Google Scholar
• Rickards F W, Tan L E, Cohen L T, Wilson O J, Drew J H, Clark G M. Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 327–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockstroh B, Muller M, Heinz A, Wagner M, Berg P, Elbert T. Modulation of auditory responses during oddball tasks. Biol Psychol 1996; 43: 41–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez R, Picton T, Linden D, Hamel G, Laframboise G. Human auditory steady state responses: effects of intensity and frequency. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 300–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh J W, Varner J L, Paige S R, Eckardt M J, Ellingson R J. Event-related perturbations in an electrophysiological measure of auditory function: a measure of sensitivity during orienting?. Biol Psychol 1989; 29: 247–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh J W, Varner J L, Paige S R, Eckardt M J, Ellingson R J. Auditory and visual event-related perturbations in the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 76: 148–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ros B, Borgmann C, Draganova R, Roberts L E, Pantev C. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 679–691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ros B, Picton T W, Pantev C. The onset of steady-state responses reflects temporal integration in the human auditory cortex. Hear Res 2002; 165: 68–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sammeth C A, Barry S J. The 40-Hz event-related potential as a measure of auditory sensitivity in normals. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 51–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarelli R, Conti G. Generation of auditory steady-state responses: linearity assessment. Scand Audiol Suppl 1999; 51: 23–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santarelli R, Maurizi M, Conti G, Ottaviani F, Paludetti G, Pettorossi V E. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRS). II: Addition of responses to individual stimuli. Hear Res 1995; 83: 9–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sapsford D J, Pickworth A J, Jones J G. A method for producing the coherent frequency: a steady-state auditory evoked response in the electroencephalogram. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1273–1278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savio G, Cardenas J, Perez Abalo M, Gonzalez A, Valdes J. The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6: 279–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers B M, Beagley H A, Riha J. Pattern analysis of auditory-evoked EEG potentials. Audiology 1979; 18: 1–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schimmel H, Rapin I, Cohen M M. Improving evoked response audiometry with special reference to the use of machine scoring. Audiology 1974; 13: 33–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoonhoven R, Boden C, jr, Verbunt J PA, de Munck J C. A whole-head MEG study of the amplitude modulation following response: phase coherence, group delays and dipole source analysis. Paper presented at 17th meeting of the Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group, VancouverCanada 2001
   Google Scholar
• Schuster A. On the investigation of hidden periodicities with application to a supposed 26 day period of meteorological phenomena. Terrestrial Magnetism Atmospheric Electricity 1898; 3: 13–41
   Google Scholar
• Schwender D, Madler C, Klasing S, Peter K, Poppel E. Anesthetic control of 40-Hz brain activity and implicit memory. Consciousness Cognition 1994; 3: 129–147
   Google Scholar
• Serafini G, Brizi S. Usefulness of auditory steady-state responses (SSR 40Hz) in post trauma coma patients. Monitoring of stimulus-induced 40Hz brain oscillations, G. Litscher. Pabst Science Publishers, Scottsdale 1998; 215–223
   Google Scholar
• Spydell J D, Pattee G, Goldie W D. The 40 Hertz auditory event-related potential: normal values and effects of lesions. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 193–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D R, Linden D, Suffield J B, Hamel G, Picton T W. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D R, Makeig S, Galambos R. Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 67: 260–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D R, Galambos R, Costello J A, Makeig S. Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 289–295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D, Picton T, Durieux-Smith A. Electrophysiologic measures of frequency-specific auditory function. Principles and applications of auditory evoked potentials, J. T. Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, New York 1994; 251–283
   Google Scholar
• Stefanatos G A, Green G G, Ratcliff G G. Neurophysiological evidence of auditory channel anomalies in developmental dysphasia. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 871–875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stefanatos G A, Foley C, Grover W, Doherty B. Steady-state auditory evoked responses to pulsed frequency modulations in children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 31–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steriade M, Amzica F, Contreras D. Synchronization of fast (30–40 Hz) spontaneous cortical rhythms during brain activation. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 392–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steriade M, Timofeev L, Durmuller N, Grenier F. Dynamic properties of corticothalamic neurons and local cortical interneurons generating fast rhythmic (30–40 Hz) spike bursts. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 483–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials. Comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain on the basis of near-threshold ABR data. Scand Audiol 1997; 26: 7–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Wernecke K. Objective response detection in the frequency domain: comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 2–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Pschirrer U. Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology 2001; 40: 63–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T, Hirabayashi M. Age-related morphological changes in auditory middle-latency response. Audiology 1987; 26: 312–320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T, Kobayashi K. An evaluation of 40-Hz event-related potentials in young children. Audiology 1984; 23: 599–604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szyfter W, Dauman R, de Sauvage R C. 40 Hz middle latency responses to low frequency tone pips in normally hearing adults. J Otolaryngol 1984; 13: 275–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang Y, Norcia A M. Improved processing of the steady-state evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 323–334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang Y, Norcia A M. An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 268–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennigkeit F, Ries C R, Schwarz D W, Puil E. Isoflurane attenuates resonant responses of auditory thalamic neurons. J Neurophysiol 1997; 78: 591–596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton C, Barrowcliffe M P, Konieczko K M. The auditory evoked response as an indicator of awareness. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 113–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes J L, Perez-Abalo M C, Martin V. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 420–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Reijden C S, Mens L HM, Snik A FM. Comparing signal-to-noise ratios of amplitude modulation following responses from four EEG derivations in awake normally hearing adults. Audiology 2001; 40: 202–207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Werff K R, Brown C J, Gienapp B A, Schmidt Clay K M. Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brain-stem response thresholds in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 227–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Victor J D, Mast J. A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 378–388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Victor J D, Mast J. A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials [published erratum appears in. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 1992: 83–270
   Google Scholar
• Viemeister N F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 1364–1380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldorff M G, Hansen J C, Hillyard S A. Evidence for effects of selective attention in the middle latency range of the human auditory event-related brain potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1987; 40: 146–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong W YS, Stapells D R. Brainstem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady state response study. Paper presented at 17th meeting of the Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group, VancouverCanada 2001
   Google Scholar
• Yvert B, Crouzeix A, Bertrand O, Seither-Preisler A, Pantev C. Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2001; 11: 411–423
   Google Scholar
• Zar J H. Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River 1999
   Google Scholar
• Zurek P M. Detectability of transient and sinusoidal otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 307–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar