References
- Battmer R-D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., Begall K., Estrada Leypon E. . Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: Relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles, Int J Audiol, in print.
- Botros A., van Dijk B., Killian M. 2006. Auto NRT: An automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 40, 15–28.
- Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A. . 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults. Ear Hear, 21, 151–163.
- Cardinael E., Theunen T., Zarowski A., Schatterman I., Verstreken M. . 2007. Correlations between t-NRT results, behavioural T/C levels, electrode impedances, and other parameters evaluated in patients with various types of Nucleus cochlear implants. Abstract from Objective Measures in Cochlear and Brainstem Implants, Varese, Italy, May 2007.
- Charasse B., Chanal J.M., Berger-Vachon C., Collet L. 2004. Influence of stimulus frequency on NRT recordings, Int J Audiol, 43, 236–244.
- Gordon K.A., Ebinger K.A., Gilden J.E., Shapiro W.H. 2002. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, Suppl., 189, 42–48.
- Holden, L.K., Skinner, M.W., Holden, T.A., Demorest, M.E. 2002. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy, Ear Hear, 23, 463–476.
- Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A.A., Gervais J.P. 2000. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children. Ear Hear, 21, 164–174.
- Patrick J.F., Busby P.A., Gibson P.J. 2006. The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system, Trends Amplif, 10, 175–200.
- Plant K.L., Whitford L.A., Psarros C.E., Vandali A.E. 2002a. Parameter selection and programming recommendations for the ACE and CIS speech-processing strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system, Cochlear Implants International, 3, 104–125.
- Plant K., Whitford L., Law M-A., Pedley K., Just Y. 2002b. Prediction of T- and C-levels at different rates of stimulation: Application of profile measured at one rate to other rates. Cochlear N95362 ISS1.
- Potts L.G., Skinner M.W., Gotter B.D., Strube M.J., Brenner C.A. 2007. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients, Ear Hear, 28, 495–511.
- Skinner M.W., Holden L.K., Holden T.A., Demorest M.E. 2000. Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant recipients’ thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels, J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 203–213.
- Smoorenburg G.F., Willeboer C., van Dijk J.E. 2002. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 7, 335–347.
- Smoorenburg G.F. 2007. Cochlear Implant Ear Marks, University Medical Center Utrecht, ISBN 13: 978-90-9021523-5.
- Thai-Van H., Chanal J.M., Coudert C., Veuillet E., Truy E. . 2001. Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: Preliminary report. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 58, 153–162.
- Van Dijk B., Botros A.M., Battmer R-D, Begall K., Dillier N. . 2007. Clinical results of AutoNRT,™ a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 28, 558–570.
- Van Wermeskerken G.K.A., Van Olphen A.F., Smoorenburg G.F. 2006. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Relation to T and C levels, Int. J. Audiol, 45, 537–544.
- van Wieringen, A., Carlyon, R.P., Macherey, O., Wouters, J. 2006. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing, Hear Res 220, 49–60.