Effects of stimulation rate on modulation detection and speech recognition by cochlear implant users

References

• Arora K., Dawson P., Dowell R.C., Vandali A.E. 2009. Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants. Int J Audiol, 48, 561–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann, P. F., Summerfield, Q. 1990. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 680–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon S.P., Viemeister N.F. 1985. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology, 24, 117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brokx J.P.L., Nooteboom S.G. 1982. Intonation and perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. 1981. Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 70, 1655–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby P.A., Clark G.M. 2000. Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 547–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby P.A., Tong Y.C., Clark G.M. 1993. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazals Y., Pelizzone M., Saudan O., Boex C. 1994. Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2048–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M., Peng S.C. 2008. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition. Hear Res, 235, 143–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G.M., Black R., Forster I.C., Patrick J.F., Tong Y.C. 1978. Design criteria of a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis [43.66.Ts, 43.66.Sr]. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 631–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colletti V., Shannon R.V. 2005. Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant? Laryngoscope, 115, 1974–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson G.S., Nelson D.A. 2000. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1645–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynes S.B., Delgutte B. 1992. Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res, 58, 79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J. 2002. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Neuroreport, 13, 1635–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J., Chinchilla S., Galvin J.J. 2004. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 5, 253–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J., Shannon R.V. 2000. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 589–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J. 3rd, Fu Q.J. 2005. Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 6, 269–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts L., Wouters J. 2001. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 713–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. 1959. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S. 2004. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 2298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X., Fu Q.J., Wei C.G., Cao K.L. 2008. Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 29, 957–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C.M., McDermott H.J., Clark G.M. 1994. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2664–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C.M., McDermott H.J., Clark G.M. 1995. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: The effect of modulation depth. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1777–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C.M., McDermott H.J. 1998. Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: The effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1061–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C., Carlyon R. 1999. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C.M., Remine M.D., McDermott H.J. 2001. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1514–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks J.C. 2008. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 100, 92–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R. 2001. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1067–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins C.W. 1989. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res, 41, 137–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst B.E., Xu L. 2005. Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 331–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst B.E., Xu L., Thompson C.S. 2007. Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 2236–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst B.E., Burkholder-Juhasz R.A., Xu L., Thompson C.S. 2008. Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 1054–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein J.T., Abbas P.J., Miller C.A. 1998. The neurophysiological effects of simulated audtitory prostheses stimulation. Eighth Quarterly Progress Report N01- DC- 62111>. National Institute of Health Neural Prosthesis Program.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V. 1992. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 2156–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y.C., Black R.C., Clark G.M., Forster I.C., Millar J.B., O'Loughlin B.J., Patrick J.F. 1979. A preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. J Laryngol Otol, 93, 679–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y.C., Clark G.M., Blamey P.J., Busby P.A., Dowell R.C. 1982. Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am, 71, 153–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L., Clark G.M. 2000. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear, 21, 608–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Sucher C., Tsang D.J., McKay C.M., Chew J.W.D., . 2005. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 3126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemeister N.F. 1979. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1364–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Zerbi M. 1997. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. Am J Otol, 18, S30–4.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L., Tsai Y., Pfingst B.E. 2002. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: Implications for cochlear prostheses. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 247–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C., Zeng F.G. 1997. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 102, 2925–34.
   Google Scholar