Speech perception in noise: Exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorder

References

• Ahissar M., Lubin Y., Putter-Katz H. Banai K. 2006. Dyslexia and the failure to form a perceptual anchor. Nat Neurosci, 9, 1558–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology. 2010. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder [technical report]. Available at http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Pages/CentralAuditoryProcessingDisorder.aspx
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders. [technical report]. Available at http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.1. 1999–R2008. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms ANSI S3.1. 1999. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bérard C. 1990–1993a. Normative data for the Canadian-French version of the SSI-ICM test. Montréal, Québec, Canada: Hôpital Rivières-des-Prairies.
   Google Scholar
• Béard C. 1990–1993b. Normative data for the Canadian French version of the SSW test. Montréal, Québec, Canada: Hôpital Rivières-des-Prairies.
   Google Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Nuetzel M.J., Rabinowitz W.M. Rzeczkowski C. 1984. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 27, 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourland Hicks C. Tharpe A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow A.R. Alexander J.A. 2007. Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners, J Acous Soc Am, 121, 2339–2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron S. Dillon H. 2008. The listening in spatialized noise - sentences test (LISN-S): Comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D. 2007. Central resources training: Metacognitive and metalinguistic skills and strategies. G.D. Chermak F.E. Musiek. Handbook of (central) Auditory Processing Disorder: Comprehensive Intervention (Vol. 2). San Diego: Plural Publishing, 107–166.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott L.L. Busse L.A. 1987. Auditory processing by learning disabled adults. D. Johnson J. Blalock. Adults with Learning Disabilities: Clinical studies. New York: Grune & Stratton, 107–129.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon M., Trehub S.E. Schneider B.A. 2002. Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments. J Acous Soc Am, 111, 2242–2249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J.F. Jerger S.W. 1975. Clinical validity of central auditory tests. Scand Audiol, 4, 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M.L., Bellis T.J. Billiet C. 2007. Audiologic assessment of ©APD. D. Geffner D. Ross-Swain. Auditory Processing Disorders. Assessment, Management, and Treatment. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N. Elliott L.L. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 61, 1337–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J. 1962. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of central auditory system. J Aud Res, 2327–2337.
   Google Scholar
• Katz J. Ivey R.G. 1994. Spondaic procedures in central testing. J. Katz. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 239–268.
   Google Scholar
• Keith R.W. 2009. Controversies in standardization of auditory processing tests. A.T. Cacace D.J. McFarland. Current Controversies in Central Auditory Processing Disorder. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S. . 2003. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people. Int J Audiol, 42(2), S92–S101.
   Google Scholar
• Krull V., Choi S., Kirk K.I., Prusick L. French B. 2009. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 30. Published ahead of print (accessed on 2009/10/22).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagacé J., Jutras B., Giguère C. Gagné J.P. 2010 Development of the test de phrases dans le bruit (TPB). Can J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 34, 261–270.
   Google Scholar
• Liasis A., Bamiou D-E., Campbell P., Sirimanna T., Boyd S. . 2003. Auditory event-related potentials in the assessment of auditory processing disorders: A pilot study. Neuropediatrics, 34, 23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch A. Normandin N. 1983. SSI: Élaboration d'une version française et application auprès d'une population d'enfants avec troubles d'apprentissage. Master's thesis, University of Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mattys S.L., Brooks J., Cooke M. 2009. Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cogn Psychol, 59, 203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo L.H., Florentine M. Buus S. 1997. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchnik C., Roth D. A-E., Othman-Jebara R., Putter-Katz H., Shabtai E.L. . 2004. Reduced medial olivocochlear bundle system function in children with auditory processing disorders. Audiol Neurootol, 9, 107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.M., Gollegly K.M. Baran J.A. 1984. Myelination of the corpus callosum and auditory processing problems in children: Theoretical and clinical correlates. Semin Hear, 5, 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson C. 2005. The use of communicative functions among pre-school children with multiple disabilities in two different settings conditions: Group versus individual patterns, Augment Altern Commun, 21, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin F. Grimault N. 2005. Fonds sonores. Laboratoire Unités Mixtes de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5020, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K.M. 2003. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol, 42, S26–S32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K.M., Schneider B. Daneman M. 1995. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röonberg J., Samuelsson S. Lyxell B. 1998. Conceptual constraints in sentence-based lipreading in hearing-impaired. R. Campbell, B. Dodd D. Burnham. Hearing by Eye II: The Psychology of Speechreading and Audiovisual Speech. Mahvah: Erlbaum. 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Rudmin F. Normandin N. 1983. Experimental dichotic tests in French modeled on SSW design. Hum Commun Can, 7, 348–360.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavetti N. Metz D.E. 2006. Evaluating research in communicative disorders. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E., Kortekaas R.W.L. Pittman A.L. 2000. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 902–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollman M.H.P., van Velzen E.C.W., Simkens H.M.F., Snik A.F.M. van den Broek P. 2003. Assessment of auditory processing in 6-year-old language-impaired children. Int J Audiol, 42, 303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar