Detectability of newborn chirp-evoked ABR in the frequency domain at different stimulus rates

References

• Abdala C. & Sininger Y.S. 1996. The development of cochlear frequency resolution in the human auditory system. Ear Hear, 17, 374–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benito-Orejas J.I., Ramirez B., Morais D., Almaraz A. & Fernandez-Calvo J.L. 2008. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 72, 1193–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R. & Hecox K. 1983. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. J Acoust Soc Am, 74, 1204–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla M. & Shehata-Dieler W. 2012. ABR-based newborn hearing screening with MB11 BERAphone using an optimized chirp for acoustical stimulation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 536–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla M., Sturzebecher E., Don M. & Muller-Mazzotta J. 2012. Auditory brainstem response recording to multiple interleaved broadband chirps. Ear Hear, 33, 466–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla M., Stürzebecher E. & Elberling C. 2006. Objective detection of auditory steady-state responses: Comparison of one-sample and q-sample tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Allen A.R. & Starr A. 1977. Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 86, 186–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Kwong B. & Tanaka C. 2005. A diagnostic test for Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops: Impaired high-pass noise masking of auditory brainstem responses. Otol Neurotol, 26, 711–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dort J.C., Tobolski C. & Brown D. 2000. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: Which test is best?. J Otolaryngol, 29, 206–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eggermont J.J., Brown D.K., Ponton C.W. & Kimberley B.P. 1996. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) traveling wave delay measurements suggests frequency-specific synapse maturation. Ear Hear, 17, 386–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C. 1979. Auditory electrophysiology: Spectral analysis of cochlear and brain stem evoked potentials. A comment on: Kevanishvili and Aphonchenko: ”Frequency composition of brain stem auditory evoked potentials“. Scand Audiol, 8, 57–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling C., Don M., Cebulla M. & Stürzebecher E. 2007. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 2772–2785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erenberg A., Lemons J., Sia C., Trunkel D. & Ziring P. 1999. Newborn and infant hearing loss: Detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998–1999. Pediatrics, 103, 527–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finitzo T., Albright K. & O’Neal J. 1998. The newborn with hearing loss: Detection in the nursery. Pediatrics, 102, 1452–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerling I.J. & Finitzo-Hieber T. 1983. Auditory brainstem response with high stimulus rates in normal and patient populations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 92, 119–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Stelmachowicz P.G., Barlow S.M. & Brookhouser P.E. 1995. Case of recurrent, reversible, sudden sensorineural hearing loss in a child. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 163–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guastini L., Mora R., Dellepiane M., Santomauro V., Mora M. et al. 2010. Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response in a multi-stage infant hearing screening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 267, 1199–1205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkins S.W., McEvoy T.M. & Scott M.L. 1979. Effects of interstimulus interval on latency of the brainstem auditory evoked potential. Int J Neurosci, 10, 7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M. et al. 2002. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr, 15, 69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Chmiel R., Glaze D. & Frost J.D. Jr. 1987. Rate and filter dependence of the middle-latency response in infants. Audiology, 26, 269–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. 2007. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, 120, 898–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky R.E. 1997. Rate and adaptation effects on the auditory evoked brainstem response in human newborns and adults. Hear Res, 111, 165–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lightfoot G., Sininger Y., Burkard R. & Lodwig A. 2007. Stimulus repetition rate and the reference levels for clicks and short tone bursts: A warning to audiologists, researchers, calibration laboratories, and equipment manufacturers. Am J Audiol, 16, 94–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lütkenhöner B., Kauffmann G., Pantev C. & B.R. 1990. Verbesserung der Synchronisation auditorisch evozierter Hirnstammpotentiale durch Verwendung eines die kochleären Laufzeitunterschiede kompensierenden Stimulus. Arch Otolaryngol Suppl., II, 157–159.
   Google Scholar
• MAICO Diagnostic GmbH. 2010. The BERAphone^® Operating Instructions MB11. Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia K.V. 1972. Statistics of Directional Data. London, New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paludetti G., Maurizi M. & Ottaviani F. 1983. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brain stem responses (ABR). Am J Otol, 4, 226–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt H. & Sohmer H. 1976. Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man. Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 212, 85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell D.W. & John M.S. 2010. Evaluating the modulation transfer function of auditory steady state responses in the 65 to 120 range. Ear Hear, 31, 667–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston J.P. 1982. The W test for normality. Appl Stat-J Roy St C, 31, 176–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S. 2002. Auditory neuropathy in infants and children: Implications for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Audiology Today, 14, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M. & Elberling C. 2005. Automated auditory response detection: Statistical problems with repeated testing. Int J Audiol, 44, 110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M., Elberling C. & Berger T. 2006. New efficient stimuli for evoking frequency-specific auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 448–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M. & Neumann K. 2003. Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening. Int J Audiol, 42, 59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M. & Wernecke K. 1999. Objective response detection in the frequency domain: Comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiol Neurootol, 4, 2–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yagi T. & Kaga K. 1979. The effect of the click repetition rate on the latency of the auditory-evoked brain stem response and its clinical use for a neurological diagnosis. Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 222, 91–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar