Influence of musical training on sensitivity to temporal fine structure

References

• Bernstein J.G.W. & Oxenham A.J. 2006. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Effects of stimulus level. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 3916–3928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoncini J., Serniclaes W. & Lorenzi C. 2009. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 682–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagyalekshmi S. (7th ed.). 2009. Ragas in Carnatic Music, CBH Publications, Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bidelman G.M., Gandour J.T. & Krishnan A. 2011a. Musicians and tone- language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch. Brain Cogn, 77, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidelman G.M., Gandour J.T. & Krishnan A. 2011b. Musicians demonstrate experience-dependent brainstem enhancement of musical scale features within continuously gliding pitch. Neurosci Lett, 503, 203–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidelman G.M., Schug J.M., Jennings S.G. & Bhagat S.P. 2014. Psychophysical auditory filter estimates reveal sharper cochlear tuning in musicians. J Acoust Soc Am, 136, EL33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss E., Hall J.W. & Grose J.H. 2004. Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 25, 242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton M., 2000. Time in Indian Music, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 10–54.
   Google Scholar
• Clinard C.G., Tremblay K.L. & Krishnan A.R. 2010. Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: Evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hear Res, 264, 48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine P. & Moore B.C.J. 1993. Frequency analysis and musical ability. Music Percept, 11, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman R.L., Griffin A.M. & Oxenham A.J. 2012. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers. J Acoust Soc Am, 132, 2514–2523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose J.H. & Mamo S.K. 2010. Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age. Ear Hear, 31, 755–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz M.G., Colburn H.S. & Carney L.H. 2001. Evaluating auditory performance limits: I. One-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve. Neural Comput, 13, 2273–2316.
   Google Scholar
• Heng J., Cantarero G., Elhilali M. & Limb C.J. 2011. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users. Hear Res, 280, 192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K.S. & Heinz M.G. 2013. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery. Hear Res, 303, 39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herholz S.C. & Zatorre R.J. 2012. Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76, 486–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K. & Moore B.C.J. 2010. Development of a fast method for measuring sensitivity to temporal fine structure information at low frequencies. Int J Audiol, 49, 940–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K. & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1055–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K. & Moore B.C.J. 2011. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 334–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin L., Amir O., Vexler Y. & Zaltz Y. 2001. Pitch discrimination: Are professional musicians better than non-musicians? J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 12, 125–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan A., Bidelman G.M., Smalt C.J., Ananthakrishnan S. & Gandour J.T. 2012. Relationship between brainstem, cortical and behavioral measures relevant to pitch salience in humans. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2849–2859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A., Xu Y., Gandour J. & Cariani P. 2005. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 25, 161–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. 1970. Transformed up-down methods in psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn H., Garnier S. & Moore B.C.J. 2006. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 18866–18869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheyl C., Dai H. & Oxenham A.J. 2010. On the possible influence of spectral- and temporal-envelope cues in tests of sensitivity to temporal fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1809.
   Google Scholar
• Micheyl C., Delhommeau K., Perrot X. & Oxenham A.J. 2006. Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination. Hear Res, 219, 36–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S.K. & Panda M.R., 2014. Experience-dependent learning of auditory temporal resolution: Evidence from Carnatic-trained musicians, Neuroreport, 25, 134–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S.K., Panda M.R. & Herbert C. 2014. Enhanced auditory temporal gap detection in listeners with musical training. J Acoust Soc Am, 136, EL173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Glasberg B.R. 1987. Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns. Hear Res, 28, 209–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R. & Alcántara J.I. 2000. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol, 34, 205–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2008. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 9, 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Flanagan H.J. & Adams J. 2006. Frequency discrimination of complex tones: Assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 480–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Gockel H.E. 2011. Resolvability of components in complex tones and implications for theories of pitch perception. Hear Res, 276, 88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Hopkins K. & Cuthbertson S. 2009. Discrimination of complex tones with unresolved components using temporal fine structure information. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 3214–3222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Sęk A. 2009a. Development of a fast method for determining sensitivity to temporal fine structure. Int J Audiol, 48, 161–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Sęk A. 2011. Effect of level on the discrimination of harmonic and frequency-shifted complex tones at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 3206–3212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Sęk A. 2009b. Sensitivity of the human auditory system to temporal fine structure at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 3186–3193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Vickers D.A & Mehta A. 2012. The effects of age on temporal fine structure sensitivity in monaural and binaural conditions. Int J Audiol, 51, 715–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore G.A. & Moore B.C.J. 2003. Perception of the low pitch of frequency-shifted complexes. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 977–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel D. 1999. The role of timing in the brain stem auditory nuclei of vertebrates. Annu Rev Physiol, 61, 497–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J. 2012. Pitch perception. J. Neurosci, 32, 13335–13338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J., Bernstein J.G.W. & Penagos H. 2004. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101, 1421–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J., Fligor B.J., Mason C.R. & Kidd G. 2003. Informational masking and musical training. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 1543–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J., Micheyl C. & Keebler M.V. 2009. Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics? J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 2189–2199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J. & Simonson A.M. 2009. Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 457–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbery-Clark A., Skoe E. & Kraus N. 2009a. Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound. J Neurosci, 29, 14100–14107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbery-Clark A., Skoe E., Lam C. & Kraus N. 2009b. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise. Ear Hear, 30, 653–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbery-Clark A., Tierney A., Strait D.L. & Kraus N. 2012. Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables. Neuroscience, 219, 111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J.E., Brugge J.F., Anderson D.J. & Hind J.E. 1967. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. J. Neurophysiol, 30, 769–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggles D.R., Freyman R.L. & Oxenham A.J. 2014. Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise. PLoS One, 9, p. e86980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo N., Nicol T., Musacchia G. & Kraus N. 2004. Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol, 115, 2021–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sęk A. & Moore B.C.J. 2012. Implementation of two tests for measuring sensitivity to temporal fine structure. Int J Audiol, 51, 58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Z.M., Delgutte B. & Oxenham A.J. 2002. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel M.F. & Watson C. 1984. Performance on frequency-discrimination tasks by musicians and nonmusicians. J Acoust Soc Am, 76, 1690–1695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelcyk O. & Dau T. 2009. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 3328–3345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervaniemi M., Just V., Koelsch S., Widmann A. & Schröger E. 2005. Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs. nonmusicians: An event-related potential and behavioral study. Exp Brain Res, 161, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade B. 2001. Music in India: The Classical Traditions, New Delhi: Manohar, pp. 27–56.
   Google Scholar
• White L.J. & Plack C.J., 2003. Factors affecting the duration effect in pitch perception for unresolved complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 3309–3316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P.C.M., Skoe E., Russo N.M., Dees T. & Kraus N. 2007. Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nat Neurosci, 10, 420–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.-G., Nie K., Stickney G.S., Kong Y.-Y., Vongphoe M. et al, 2005. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102, 2293–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar