English word frequency and recognition in bilinguals: Inter-corpus comparison and error analysis

References

• Adelman J.S., Brown G.D.A. & Quesada J.F. 2006. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychol Sci, 17, 814–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N., Gruenenfelder T. & Pisoni D.B. 2010. Clustering coefficients of lexical neighborhoods: Does neighborhood structure matter in spoken word recognition? Mental Lexicon, 5, 1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American National Corpus (2008). Retrieved on September 20, 2008. http://www.americannationalcorpus.org/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 2010. ANSI-S3.6-2010, Specifications for Audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen R.H., Feldman L.B. & Schreuder R. 2006. Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota D.A., Cortese M.J., Sergent-Marshall S.D., Spieler D.H. & Yap M.J. 2004. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. J Exp Psychol Gen, 133, 283–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B. et al. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behav Res Methods, 39, 445–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best C.T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: W. Strange (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, USA: York Press, pp. 171–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow A.R. & Pisoni D.B. 1999. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2074–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert M. & New B. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods, 41, 977–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess C. & Livesay K. 1998. The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kuc era and Francis. Behav Res Methods, 30, 272–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll J. & White M. 1973. Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture naming latency. Q J Exp Psychol, 25, 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillside, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut J. 2007. Phonological complexity and language learnability. Am J Sp Lang Pathol, 16, 6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray S. & Brinkley S. 2011. Fast mapping and word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment in a supported learning context: Effect of encoding cues, phonotactic probability, and object familiarity. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 54, 870–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes D. 1957. On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. J Acoust Soc Am, 29, 296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai S., Walley A.C. & Flege J.E. 2005. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accent words by native English and Spanish listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 896–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk K.I., Eisenberg L.S., Martinez A.S. & Hay-McCutcheon M. 1999. Lexical neighborhood test: Test-retest reliability and interlist equivalency. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Levi S.V., Winters S.J. & Pisoni D.B. 2007. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 2327–2338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce P.A. & Pisoni D.B. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear Hear, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund K. & Burgess C. 1996. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behav Res Methods, 28, 203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian V., Blumenfeld H.K. & Kaushanskaya M. 2007. The Language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 50, 940–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle R. & Wilson R.H. 2008. Prediction of word recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 507–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G.A. & Nicely P.E. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am, 27, 338–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum H.C. Pisoni D.B. & Davis C.K. 1984. Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20 000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report(No. 10). Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology Department, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Rao C., Mathur A. & Singh N. 2013. Cost in transliteration: The neurocognitive processing of Romanized writing. Brain Lang, 124, 205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers C.L., Lister J., Febo D., Besing J. & Abrams H. 2006. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin H. B. 1963. Word frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 35, 200–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. 2010. Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 53, 821–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. 2014. Lexical effects on recognition of the NU-6 words by monolingual and bilingual listeners. Int J Audiol, 53, 318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. & Morozova N. 2012. Understanding Russian/English bilinguals’ errors on an English word recognition test. Int J Audiol, 51, 597–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. & Sánchez D. 2011. The role of word familiarity in Spanish/English bilingual word recognition. Int J Audiol, 50, 66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel H.L., Armbrüster J. & Hoga T.P. 2006. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 49, 1175–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist P. & Sylvén L.K. 2014. Language-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL, 26, 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayanagi S., Dirks D.D. & Moshfegh A. 2002. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 45, 585–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman T.W. & Carhart R. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Triesman M. 1978. Space or lexicon? The word frequency effect and the error response frequency effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M.D. & Bilger R.C. 1973. Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am, 54, 1248–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevin J.D. & Seidenberg M.S. 2002. Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. J Mem Lang, 47, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar