Evaluating hearing aid handling skills: A systematic and descriptive review

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1998. Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults.
   Google Scholar
• Audiology Australia. 2013. Audiology Australia Professional Practice Standards - Part B Clinical Standards, p. clinical guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Barten J.A., Pisters M.F., Huisman P.A., Takken T. & Veenhof C. 2012. Measurement properties of patient-specific instruments measuring physical function. J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 590–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumfield A. & Dillon H. 2001. Factors affecting the use and perceived benefit of ITE and BTE hearing aids. British Journal of Audiology, 35, 247–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A. & Kramer S.E. 2000. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear, 21, 37S–49S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli S., Staehelin K., Zemp E., Schindler C., Bodmer D. et al. 2009. Survey on Hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol, 48, 183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block M. 2001. Hearing aid repair rates. AudiologyOnline.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks D.N. & Hallam R.S. 1998. Attitudes to hearing difficulty and hearing aids and the outcome of audiological rehabilitation. British Journal of Audiology, 32, 217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D., Schmitt N., DeShon R.P., Clause C.S. & Delbridge K. 1997. Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. J Appl Psychol, 82, 300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm T.H., Johnson C.E., Danhauer J.L., Portz L.J., Abrams H.B. et al. 2007. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: Final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 151–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cienkowski K.M., McHugh M.S., McHugo G.J., Musiek F.E., Cox R.M. et al. 2006. A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 45, 393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Mansfield J. & Taylor J. 2004. Hearing aid use in nursing homes, Part 1: Prevalence rates of hearing impairment and hearing aid use. American Medical Directors Association, 5, 283–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins M.P., Liu C.F., Taylor L., Souza P.E. & Yueh B. 2013. Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation: Individual versus group trial results. J Rehabil Res Dev, 50, 585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins M.P., Souza P.E., Liu C.F., Heagerty P.J., Amtmann D. et al. 2009. Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation: Individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. & Alexander G. 2000. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 368–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R., Alexander G. & Xu J. 2009. Development of the Device Oriented Subjective Outcome Scale (DOSO) Annual Meeting of the American Auditory Society. Scottsdale, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. 2003. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: Getting the client’s point of view. Int J Audiol, 42 Suppl. 1, S90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. 2005. Evidence-based practice in audiology. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 408–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 1999. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear Hear, 20, 306–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2001. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear, 22, 151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version: El Inventario International de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA): Propiedades psicometricas de la version en ingles. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet H.C., Terwee C.B. & Bouter L.M. 2003. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol, 56, 1137–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins J.L. & Doherty K.A. 2009. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly? Am J Audiol, 18, 69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, James & Ginis 1997. The Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H., Birtles G. & Lovegrove R. 1999. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: Normative data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and the Hearing aid User’s Questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. & So M. 2000. Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcomes measures by clinicians. Ear Hear, 21, 2S–6S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty K.A. & Desjardins J.L. 2012. The practical hearing aids skills test - revised. Am J Audiol, 21, 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R., Davey C., Buxton M.J. & Jones D.R. 1998. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess, 2, i-iv, 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Garstecki D.C. & Erler S.F. 1998. Hearing loss, control, and demographic factors influencing hearing aid use among older adults. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 41, 527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R. & Grimshaw J. 2003. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients” care. Lancet, 362, 1225–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H. & Patrick D.L. 1993. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med, 118, 622–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G.H., Kirshner B. & Jaeschke R. 1992. Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol, 45, 1341–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw H., Clark D.P., Kang S. & Ferguson M.A. 2012. Computer skills and internet use in adults aged 50–74 years: Influence of hearing difficulties. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L., Laplante-Levesque A. & Wong L. 2013. Evidence-based practice in audiology: Rehabilitation options for adults with hearing impairment. Am J Audiol, 22, 329–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson I.J. 2007. Letters to the editor: Quality criteria valuable with slight modification J Clin Epidemiol, 60, 1315–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes 2012. Verification and validation: The chasm between protocol and practice. The Hearing Journal, 65, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Garner C.B., Wilson D.L. & Barlow N.N. 2001. Hearing aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 44, 469–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Halling D. & Coughlin M. 1996. Reliability and stability of various hearing aid outcome measures in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 39, 923–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Wilson D.L., Barlow N.N., Garner C.B. & Amos N. 2002. Longitudinal changes in hearing aid satisfaction and usage in the elderly over a period of one or two years after hearing aid delivery. Ear Hear, 23, 428–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Wilson D.L., Humes L., Barlow N.N., Garner C.B. et al. 2002. A comparison of two measures of hearing aid satisfaction in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers. Ear Hear, 23, 422–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter B. & Bridger M. 2008. An out-patient study into the suitability of providing ear, nose, & throat patients with internet based information. Internet J Med Inform, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde M.L. 2000. Reasonable psychometric standards for self-report outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear, 21, 24S–36S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C., Peto V. & Coulter A. 1996. Making sense of ambiguity: Evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia. Quality in Health Care, 5, 9–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juniper E.F. 2009. Validated questionnaires should not be modified. Eur Respir J, 34, 1015–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemker B.E. 1999. The effects of pre-fitting and post-fitting hearing aid orientation on patient outcome University of Florida. Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Kemker B.E., Goshorn E.L. & Kaplan H. 2012. Analysis of hearing instrument use, satisfaction, and operation in independent elderly male veterans. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 15, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen L.V., Laplante-Levesque A., Jones L., Preminger J.E., Nielsen C. et al. 2012. Conducting qualitative research in audiology: A tutorial. Int J Audiol, 51, 83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 1990. Introducing MarkeTrak: A consumer tracking survey of the hearing instrument market. The Hearing Journal, 43, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2000. Marke Track V: “Why my hearing aids are in the drawer”: The consumers” perspective. The Hearing Journal, 53, 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2002. MarkeTrak VI: Ten-year customer satisfaction trends in the US hearing instrument market. Hearing Review, 9, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2005. MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. The Hearing Journal, 58, 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2009. MarkeTrak VIII: 25-year trends in the hearing health market. Hearing Review, 16, 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2010. Marke Track VII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. The Hearing Journal, 63, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin S., Beck D., Christensen L., Compton-Conley C., Fligor B. et al. 2012. MarkeTrak VIII: The impact of the hearing healthcare professional on hearing aid user success. The Hearing Review.
   Google Scholar
• Kottner J., Audige L., Brorson S., Donner A., Gajewski B.J. et al. 2011. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M., Hickey S. & Shaw S. 2000. Manual dexterity and successful hearing aid use. J Laryngol Otol, 114, 593–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis J.R. & Koch G.G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplante-Levesque A., Jensen L.D., Dawes P. & Nielsen C. 2012. Optimal hearing aid use: Focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists. Ear Hear.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley G. 2006. Current hearing aid fitting protocols: Results from an online survey. Audiology Today, 18, 19.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod B., Upfold L. & Broadbent C. 2001. An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, satisfaction with amplification in daily life, at 2 weeks post hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear, 22, 342–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister H., Lausberg I., Kiessling J., von Wedel H. & Walger M. 2002. Identifying the needs of elderly, hearing-impaired persons: The importance and utility of hearing aid attributes. Euro Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 259, 531–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer C., Hickson L. & Fletcher A. 2014. Identifying the barriers and facilitators to optimal hearing aid self-efficacy. Int J Audiol, 53 Suppl. 1, S28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J. & Altman D.G. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Knol D.L., Stratford P.W., Alonso J. et al. 2006. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., Alonso J., Stratford P.W. et al. 2010. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res, 19, 539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., Alonso J., Stratford P.W. et al. 2010. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health- related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Stratford P.W., Alonso J., Patrick D.L. et al. 2009. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res, 18, 313–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie S.T., Kothari A., Bagatto M.P., Seewald R., Miller L.T. et al. 2011. Knowledge translation in audiology: Promoting the clinical application of best evidence. Trends Amplif, 15, 5–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller & Picou 2010. Survey examines popularity of real-ear probe-microphone measures. The Hearing Journal, 63, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mulrow C.D., Tuley M.R. & Aguilar C. 1992. Correlates of successful hearing aid use in older adults. Ear Hear, 13, 108–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevo B. 1985. Face validity revisited. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 287–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H. & Berge J.M.t. 1967. Psychometric Theory: McGraw-Hill New York.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg M., Wanstrom G., Hjertman H., Lunner T. & Andersson G. 2009. Development and initial validation of the “Clinical Global Impression” to measure outcomes for audiological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil, 31, 1409–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva C.E., Barroso E.M., Carneseca E.C., de Padua Souza C., Dos Santos F.T. et al. 2014. A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez E. & Edmonds B.A. 2012. A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: A descriptive summary of measurement tools. PloS one, 7, e31831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelka M.M., Cruickshanks K.J., Wiley T.L., Tweed T.S., Klein B. et al. 1998. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: The Epidemiology of hearing loss study. J Am Geriatr Soc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothier D.D. & Bredenkamp C. 2006. Hearing aid insertion: Correlation between patients” confidence and ability. J Laryngol Otol, 120, 378–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki D., Hays R.D., Cella D. & Sloan J. 2008. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 61, 102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Chisolm T.H. & Abrams H.B. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes: Not as easy as it seems. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H. & Cienkowski K.M. 1996. Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the attitudes towards loss of hearing questionnaire. Ear Hear, 17, 505–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Frederick M.T., Silverman S. & Papesh M. 2013. Application of the health belief model: Development of the hearing beliefs questionnaire (HBQ) and its associations with hearing health behaviors. Int J Audiol, 52, 558–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott I. 1997. You can’t believe all that you’re told: The issue of unvalidated questionnaires. Injury Prevention, 3, 5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh G., Pichora-Fuller K., Hayes D., Schroeder H.v. & Carnahan H. 2013. The aging hand and the ergonomics of hearing aid controls. Ear Hear, 34, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S.L., Ricketts T., McArdle R.A., Chisolm T.H., Alexander G. et al. 2013. Style preference survey: A report on the psychometric properties and a cross-validation experiment. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 89–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim J., Kværner K.J., Sandvik L. & Falkenberg E.-S. 2012. Factors affecting older adults” hearing aid use. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 14, 300–312.
   Google Scholar
• Squires J.E., Estabrooks C.A., O’Rourke H.M., Gustavsson P., Newburn-Cook C.V. et al. 2011. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of self-report research utilization measures used in healthcare. Implementation Science: IS, 6, 83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D.L. & Norman G.R. 2008. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swingler G.H., Volmink J. & Ioannidis J. 2003. Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: Database analysis. BMJ, 327, 1083–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi G., Martinez C.D., Beamer S., Bridges J., Noffsinger D. et al. 2007. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 323–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor B. 2007. Self-report assessment of hearing aid outcomes: An overview Audiology Online.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R., van der Windt D.A., Knol D.L. et al. 2007. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 60, 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorén E.S., Andersson G. & Lunner T. 2012. The use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: Online vs. paper-and-pencil administration. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, 12, 12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorén E.S., Öberg M., Wänström G., Andersson G. & Lunner T. 2013. Internet access and use in adults with hearing loss. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upfold L., May A. & Battaglia J. 1990. Hearing aid manipulation skills in an elderly population: A comparison of ITE, BTE, and ITC aids. British Journal of Audiology, 24, 311–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uriarte M., Denzin L., Dunstan A., Sellars J. & Hickson L. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 383–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware Jr J.E. & Sherbourne C.D. 1992. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• West R.L. & Smith S.L. 2007. Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire. Int J Audiol, 46, 759–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh B., McDowell J.A., Collins M., Souza P.E., Loovis C.F. et al. 2005. Development and validation of the effectiveness of [corrected] auditory rehabilitation scale. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 131, 851–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar