References
- Akeroyd M.A., Guy F.H., Harrison D.L. & Suller S.L. 2014. A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale). Int J Audiol, 53, 101–114.
- Arlinger S. 2000. Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation? Ear Hear, 21(4 Suppl.), 97S–99S.
- Asendorpf J.B., Conner M., De Fruyt F., De Houwer J., Denissen J.J.A. et al. 2013. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology: Recommendations for increasing replicability. Eur J Personal, 27, 108–119.
- Banh J., Singh G. & Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2012. Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 81–91; quiz 139–140.
- Benjamini Y. & Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol, 57, 289–300.
- Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. et al. 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21(4 Suppl.), 106S–115S.
- Demeester K., Topsakal V., Hendrickx J.-J., Fransen E., van Laer L. et al. 2012. Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5). Ear Hear, 33, 615–616.
- Field A., Miles J. & Field Z. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R, London: Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications Ltd.
- Gatehouse S. & Akeroyd M. 2006. Two-eared listening in dynamic situations. Int J Audiol, 45 Suppl. 1, S120–124.
- Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
- Glickman M.E., Rao S.R. & Schultz M.R. 2014. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 67, 850–857.
- Heo J.-H., Lee J.-H. & Lee W.-S. 2013. Bimodal benefits on objective and subjective outcomes for adult cochlear implant users. Korean J Audiol, 17, 65–73.
- House J.W., Kutz J.W., Chung J. & Fisher L.M. 2010. Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness. The Laryngoscope, 120, 601–607.
- Kiessling J., Grugel L., Meister H. & Meis M. 2011. Übertragung der Fragebögen SADL, ECHO und SSQ ins Deutsche und deren Evaluation. German translations of questionnaires SADL, ECHO, and SSQ and their evaluation. Z Audiol, 6–16.
- Mertens G., Punte A.K. & Van de Heyning P. 2013. Self-assessment of hearing disabilities in cochlear implant users using the SSQ and the reduced SSQ5 version. Otol Neurotol, 34, 1622–1629.
- Moulin A., Pauzie A. & Richard C. 2015. Validation of a French translation of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and comparison with other language versions. Int J Audiol, 54, 889–98.
- Noble W. 2013. Self-assessment of Hearing, 2nd rev. edn. San Diego, USA: Plural Publishing Inc.
- Noble W., Jensen N.S., Naylor G., Bhullar N. & Akeroyd M.A. 2013. A short form of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: The SSQ12. Int J Audiol, 52, 409–412.
- Singh G. & Pichora-Fuller K. 2010. Older adults’s performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int J Audiol, 49, 733–740.
- Smith G.T., McCarthy D.M. & Anderson K.G. 2000. On the sins of short form development. Psychol Assess, 12, 102–111.
- Stanton J.M., Sinar E.F., Balzer W.B. & Smith P.C. 2002. Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Pers Psychol, 55, 167–194.
- Steiger J.H. 1980. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull, 87, 245–251.
- Voyer D., Voyer S. & Bryden M.P. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull, 117, 250–270.
- Widaman K.F., Little T.D., Preacher K.J. & Sawalani G.M. 2011. On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In: K.H. Trzesniewski, M.B. Donnellan, R.E. Lucas, (eds.). Secondary Data Analysis: An Introduction for Psychologists. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association, pp. 39–61.