A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners

References

• ANSI (1997) ANSI S3.5-1997, American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bench J., Kowal A. & Bamford J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) Sentence Lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol, 13, 108–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binns C. & Culling J.F. 2007. The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1765–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P. & Weenink D. 2013. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 5.3.41.,
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow A.R., Torretta G.M. & Pisoni D.B. 1996. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Commun, 20, 255–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney M.P., Folmer R.L., Vachhani J., McMillan G.P., Watson C.S. & Kidd G.R. 2013. Test performance of a computer version of the Digits-In-Noise test for adult hearing screening. Poster Presented at the 36th Annual Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes T., Ventura P. & Kolinsky R. 2007. Statistical information and coarticulation as cues to word boundaries: a matter of signal quality. Percept Psychophys, 69, 856–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frachet B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp M.W., de Groot A.M., Festen J.M., Smits C. & Goverts S.T. 2016. The influence of lexical-access ability and vocabulary knowledge on measures of speech recognition in noise. Int J Audiol, 55, 157-167.
   Google Scholar
• Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N. & Elliott L.L. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 61, 1337–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M.C., Niquette P.A., Gudmundsen G.I., Revit L.J. & Banerjee S. 2004. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 2395–2405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laures J.S. & Bunton K. 2003. Perceptual effects of a flattened fundamental frequency at the sentence level under different listening conditions. J Commun Disord, 36, 449–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyzenga J. & Smits C. 2011. Effects of Coarticulation, Prosody, and Noise Freshness on the Intelligibility of Digit Triplets in Noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller S.E., Schlauch R.S. & Watson P.J. 2010. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, 435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niquette, P., Arcaroli, J., Revit, L., Parkinson, A., Staller, S.,. et al. 2003. Development of the BKB-SIN Test. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Ozimek E., Kutzner D., Sek A. & Wicher A. 2009a. Development and evaluation of Polish digit triplet test for auditory screening. Speech Comm, 51, 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek E., Kutzner D., Sek A. & Wicher A. 2009b. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. Int J Audiol, 48, 433–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhebergen K.S., Versfeld N.J. & Dreschler W.A. 2008. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners. Int J Audiol, 47, 185–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Festen J.M. 2011. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: Steady-state noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 2987–2998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Festen J.M. 2013. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II fluctuating noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 3004–3015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2005. Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Ear Hear, 26, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2006. Measurements and calculations on the simple up-down adaptive procedure for speech-in-noise tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1608–1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Goverts S.T. & Festen J.M. 2013. The digits-in-noise test: Assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 1693–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X. & Humes L.E. 2010. Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, 2100–2111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson C.S., Kidd G.R., Miller J.D., Smits C. & Humes L.E. 2012. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 757–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Sanchez V., McArdle R.A., Wilson R.H., Kidd G.R., Watson C.S. & Bourne A.L. 2014. Validation of a Screening Test of Auditory Function using the Telephone. J Am Acad Audiol, 25, 937–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H. 2003. Development of a speech in multitalker babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 453–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson R.H. & Burks C.A. 2005. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: a clinic protocol. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 839–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll M.A., Wagener K.C., Brand T., Buschermöhle M. & Kollmeier B. 2012. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype. Int J Audiol, 51, 697–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar