Comparing auditory steady-state responses amplitude evoked by simultaneous air- and bone-conducted stimulation in newborns

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1997. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening [Guidelines]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI. 1996. American National Standard Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6–1996). New York, ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Suzuki Y., Yokota M., Furuse H., Watanabe T. & Ito T. 1998. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol, 4, 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla M. & Elberling C. 2010. Auditory brain stem responses evoked by different chirps based on different delay models. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 452–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla M. & Shehata-Dieler W. 2012. ABR-based newborn hearing screening with MB11 BERAphone® using an optimized chirp for acoustical stimulation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 536–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Gambelunghe M.B. & Clark D.A. 2015. Sensory Development. Pediatr Clin North Am, 62, 367–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durieux-Smith A., Picton T.W., Bernard P., MacMurray B. & Goodman J.T. 1991. Prognostic validity of brainstem electric response audiometry in infants of a neonatal intensive care unit. IJA, 30, 249–265.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton J. & Stapells D.R. 2011. The efficiency of the single- versus multiple-stimulus auditory steady state responses in infants. Ear Hear, 32, 349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton J.L. & Stapells D.R. 2013. Monotic Versus Dichotic Multiple-Stimulus Auditory Steady State Responses in Young Children. Ear Hear, 34, 680–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T. & Stapells D.R. 2001. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. IJA, 30, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Picton T.W. & Stapells D.R. 2002. Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1569–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T. & Stapells D.R. 2003. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol, 42, 237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizing E.H. 1960. Bone conduction-the influence of the middle ear. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 155, 1–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James A.L. 2011. The assessment of olivocochlear function in neonates with real-time distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Laryngoscope, 121, 202–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G.& Picton T.W. 1998. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Purcell D.W., Dimitrijevic A. & Picton T.W. 2002. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 246–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH), American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. 2007. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, 120, 898–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe D., Bulen J., Arehart K. & Burns E.M. 1993. Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2617–2638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe D.H., Bulen J.C., Campbell S.L. & Burns E.M 1994. Pressure transfer function and absorption cross section from the diffuse field to the human infant ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 355–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G. & Picton T.W. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton S.J., Gorga M.P., Widen J.E., Folsom R.C., Sininger Y., et al. 2000. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear, 21, 508–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Abalo M.C., Rodríguez E., Sánchez M., Santos E. & Torres-Fortuny A. 2013. New system for neonatal hearing screening based on auditory steady state responses. J Med Eng Technol, 37, 368–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pérez-Abalo M.C., Savío G., Torres A., Martín V., Rodríguez E. & Galán L. 2001. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear, 22, 200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., van Roon P. & John M.S. 2009. Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate. Ear Hear, 30, 100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savío G. & Pérez-Abalo M. 2008. Auditory Steady-State Responses. Generation, Recording and Clinical Application. Rance G (eds.). Auditory Steady-state Responses and Hearing Screening. San Diego: Plural Publishing, pp. 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Small S.A. & Stapells D.R. 2004. Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 25, 611–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small S.A. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to bone-conduction stimuli in adults with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 172–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small S.A. & Stapells D.R. 2006. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 27, 219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small S.A., Hatton J.L. & Stapells D.R. 2007. Effects of bone oscillator coupling method, placement location, and occlusion on bone-conduction auditory steady-state responses in infants. Ear Hear, 28, 83–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small S.A. & Hu N. 2011. Maturation of the occlusion effect: A bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 32, 708–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small S.A., Smyth A. & Leon G. 2014. Effective Masking Levels for 500 and 2000 Hz Bone Conduction Auditory Steady State Responses in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing. Ear Hear, 35, 63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson D.C., McPhillips H., Davis R.L., Lieu T.A., Homer C.J. & Helfand M. 2001. Universal newborn hearing screening. JAMA, 286, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonndorf J. 1966. Bone conduction: Studies in experimental animals. Acta Otolaryngol, 213, 1–132.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés J.L., Pérez-Abalo M.C., Martin V., Savío G., Sierra C., Rodriguez E., et al. 1997. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear, 18, 420–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar