Tumor Bioelectric Potential and its Possible Exploitation for Tumor Growth Retardation

References

• du Bois-Reymond E. Untersuchungen uber tierische Electricitat. Georg Reiner, Berlin 1860; 268
   Google Scholar
• Fenson D. S. The bioelectric potentials of plants and their functional significance. Can. J. Botany 1958; 36: 367–383
   Google Scholar
• Burr H. S., Northrop F. S.C. Evidence for the existence of an electrodynamic field in living organisms. Zoology 1939; 25: 284–288
   Google Scholar
• Burr H. S. The meaning of bioelectric potentials. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1944; 16: 353–360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schauble M. K., Gullick H.I., Habal M. B. Variations in tissue electropotentials and their possible significance. J. Surg. Res. 1972; 12: 325–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgens R. B. What is the role of naturally produced electric current in vertebrate regeneration and healing?. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1982; 76: 245–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker A. T., Jaffe L. F., Vanable J. W., Jr. The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am. J. Physiol. 1982; 242: R358–R366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakkalakal D. A., Wilson R. F., Connoly J. F. Epidermal and endosteal sources of endogenous electricity in injured canine limbs. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988; 35: 19–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr H. S., Harvey S. C., Taffel M. Bioelectric correlates of wound healing. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1938; 11: 103–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnes T. C. Healing rate of human skin determined by measurement of the electrical potential of experimental abrasions. Am. J. Surg. 1945; 69: 82–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonesio R. J., Chen A. C.N. Nonsudorific skin potential level: Current hypothesis and psychophysiological significance. Intern. J. Neurosci. 1987; 32: 783–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jercinovic A., Bobanovic F., Rebersek S., et al. Endogenous potentials of injured. Proc. Second Intl. School: Electromagnetic Fields and Membranes, Pleven, Bulgaria 1989
   Google Scholar
• Langman L., Burr H. S. A technique to aid in the detection of malignancy of the female genital tract. Am. J. Obst. Gyn. 1949; 57(274)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burr H. S., Smith G. M., Strong L. C. Bioelectric properties of cancer-resistant and cancer-susceptible mice. Am. J. Cancer 1938; 32: 240–248
   Google Scholar
• Burr H. S. Electrometrics of atypical growth. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1952; 25: 67–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino A. A., Morris D. M., Keys T. On the relationships between surface electrical potentials and cancer. J. Bioelectricity 1989; 8(279)
   Google Scholar
• Habal M., Schauble M. Electropotential differentiation of normal and tumor tissue. Surg. Forum 1967; 18: 88–90
   Google Scholar
• Schauble M. K., Habal M. B. Electropotentials of normal tissue. J. Surg. Res. 1969; 9: 513–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble M. K., Habal M. B. Electropotentials of tumor tissue. J. Surg. Res. 1969; 9: 517–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi F., Towe B. C. Investigation of cancer tumor biopotentials in mice. Proc. Eighth Annual BRAGS 1988; 60
   Google Scholar
• Nordenstrom B. Biologically closed electric circuits: Activation of vascular interstitial closed electric circuits for treatment of inoperable cancers. J. Bioelectricity 1984; 3: 137–153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey C. E., Seal E. H. Biophysical approach toward tumor regression in mice. Science 1959; 130: 388–390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habal M. B., Schauble M. K. Clinical device note: An implantable DC power unit for control of experimental tumor growth in hamsters. Med. Instrument. 1973; 7: 305–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schauble M. K., Habal M. B., Gullick H. D. Inhibition of experimental tumor growth in hamsters by small direct currents. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1977; 101: 294–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habal M. B. Effect of applied DC currents on experimental tumor growth in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1980; 14: 789–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David S. L., Absolom D. R., Smith C. R., et al. Effect of low level direct current on in vivo tumor growth in hamsters. Cancer Res. 1985; 45: 5625–5631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino A. A., Morris D., Arnold T. Electrical treatment of Lewis lung carcinoma in mice. J. Surg. Res. 1986; 41: 198–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris D. M., Marino A. A. Percutaneous electrical treatment of tumors. Proc. AACR 1988; 29, Abst. #870
   Google Scholar
• Miklavcic D., Sersa G., Magister S., et al. Low intensity direct current as an antitumor agent?. Radiol. Iugosl. 1990; 24: 75–78
   Google Scholar
• Sersa G., Miklavcic D. Inhibition of Sa-1 tumor growth in mice by human leukocyte interferon alpha combined with low-level direct current. Mol. Biother. 1990; 2: 165–168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordenstrom B. E.W. Electrochemical treatment of cancer. I: Variable response to anodic and cathodic fields. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. (CCT) 1989; 12: 530–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordenstrom B. E.W. Electrochemical treatment of cancer. II: Effect of electrophoretic influence on andriamycin. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. (CCT) 1990; 13: 75–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stell G. G. Growth Kinetics of Tumors. Clarendon, Oxford 1977; 4–55
   Google Scholar
• Milas L., Wike J., Hunter N., et al. Macrophage content of murine sarcomas and carcinomas: Associations with tumor growth parameters and tumor radiocurability. Cancer Res. 1987; 47: 1069–1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton J. S., Tsokos J. O. Statistical Methods in the Biological and Health Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf F. J., Sokal R. R. Statistical Tables. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco 1969
   Google Scholar
• McHardy J., Geller D., Brummer S. B. An approach to corrosion control during electrical stimulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1977; 5: 144–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond A. M. Characteristics of the metal-tissue interface of stimulation electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1976; 23: 274–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer J.T. Motor control. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System. American Physiological Society, B. Brooks. Bethesda, Maryland 1981; Vol. 2: 155–187
   Google Scholar