Dermatotoxicology Monographs I. Cutaneous Irritation: Factors Influencing the Response to Irritants

References

• Stedman's Medical Dictionary23rd ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1976; 724
   Google Scholar
• Sarkany I., Gaylarde P. M. Thickening of guinea pig epidermis due to application of commonly used ointment bases. Trans. St. John's Hosp. 1973; 59: 241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butcher E. The effects of applications of various substances on the epidermis of the rat. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1951; 16: 85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaaf F., Gross F. Tierexperimentelle untersuchungen mit salben und salbengrundlagen. Dermatologica 1953; 106: 357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kligman A. M., Wooding W. M. A method for the measurement and evaluation of irritants on human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1967; 49: 78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore R. N., Shelley W. B. Contact dermatitis from stearyl alcohol and propylene glycol in fluocinonide cream. Arch. Dermatol. 1974; 109: 397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björnberg A. Skin Reactions to Primary Irritants in Patients, with Hand Eczema. Oscar Isacsons Tryckeri AB, GöteborgSweden 1968
   Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Zakrzewski Z., Prokopczyk G., Kozlowska A. Application of emulsifiers in the patch test. Dermatologica 1976; 153: 333
   Google Scholar
• Schaaf F. Chemische konstitution und wirkung im akanthosetest. Dermatologica 1961; 123: 362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein W., personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Malten K. E., Nater J. P., van Ketel W. G. Patch Testing Guidelines. Dekker and van de Vogt, NijmegenThe Netherlands 1976; 19
   Google Scholar
• Cronin E., Stoughton R. B. Percutaneous absorption. Regional variations and the effect of hydration and epidermal stripping. Brit. J. Dermatol. 1962; 74: 265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann R. J., Maibach H. I. Regional variation in percutaneous penetration of 14C cortisol in man. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1967; 48: 181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach H. I., Feldmann R. J., Milby T. H., Serrat W. F. Regional variation in percutaneous penetration in man. Pesticides. Arch. Environ. Health 1971; 23: 208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson B., Hersle K. Patch test methods II. Regional variations of patch test responses. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. 1965; 45: 257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant S. P., Maibach H. I. Reproducibility of allergy epicutaneous test techniques. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1973; 51: 245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl M. V., Trancik R. J. Sodium lauryl sulfate irritant patch tests: Degree of inflammation at various times. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röckl H., Müller E., Haltermann W. Zum aussagewert positiver epicutantests bei säuglingen und kindern. Arch. Klin. Exp. Dermatol. 1966; 226: 407
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein W. R. Contact‐type delayed hypersensitivity in infants and children: induction of Rhus sensitivity. Pediatrics 1961; 27: 51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenraads P. J., Bleumink E., Nater J. P. Susceptibility to primary irritants. Age dependence and relation to contact allergic reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 377
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner G., Pürschel W. Klinisch‐analytische studie zum neurodermitisproblem. Dermatologica 1962; 125: 1, cited by Björnberg ‘23’
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seeberg G. Hudens reactivitet för tvattmedel i deras egenskap av primärt hudretande ämnen. Svenska Läkartidningen 1955; 52: 3081, cited by Björnberg ‘23’
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björnberg A. Skin reactions to primary irritants in men and women. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. 1975; 55: 191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 28–20, Cited by Björnberg ‘7’
   Google Scholar
• Marshall E. K., Lynch V., Smith H. W. Variations in sus‘‐ceptibility of the skin to dichloroethylsulfide. J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 1919; 12: 291, cited by Weigand and Gaylor ‘27’
   Google Scholar
• Weigand D. A., Mershon M. M. The cutaneous irritant reaction to agen O‐chlorobenzylidene malonitrile (CS). I. Quantitation and racial influence in human subjects. February, 1970, Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report 4332, cited by Weigand and Gaylor ‘27’
   Google Scholar
• Weigand D. A., Gaylor J. R. Irritant reactions in Negro and Caucasian skin. South. Med. J. 1974; 67: 548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst R., Moller H. One hundred twin pairs patch tested with primary irritants. Brit. J. Dermatol. 1975; 93: 145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw T. G., Herrmann F. Studies of skin reactions to propylene glycol. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1952; 19: 423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannuksela M., Pirila V., Salo O. P. Skin reactions to propylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malten K. E., Thiele F. A. J. Some theoretical aspects of orthoergic (irritant) dermatitis. Arch. Belges Dermatol. 1973; 28: 9
   Google Scholar
• Rothenborg H. W., Menné T., Siølin K. E. Temperature dependent primary irritant dermatitis from lemon perfume. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McOsker D. E., Beck L. W. Characteristics of accomodated (hardened) skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1967; 48: 372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M. A., Maibach H. I., Salmon S. E. Skin reactivity in patients with cancer‐impaired delayed hypersensitivity or faulty inflammatory response. New Engl. J. Med. 1971; 284: 1255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidenfeld St. Beiträge zur pathogenese des skzems. Arch. Derm. u. Syph. 1912; 111: 891, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 21
   Google Scholar
• Zierz P., Kiessling W., Berg A. Experimentelle prüfung der hautfunktion bei ichthyosis vulgaris. Arch. Klin. Exp. Dermatol. 1960; 209: 592, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz I. H. Beiträge zum klinischen studium und der quantitativen prüfung der hautreaktion auf chemische reize. I. Mitteilung: uber das verhalten normaler und leukopathischer hautstellen hautranker und hautgesunder menschen gegen dosierte chemische reize. Arch. Derm. u. Syph. 1912; 113: 987, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 21
   Google Scholar
• Halter K. Zur pathogenese des ekzems. Arch. Derm. u. Syph. 1941; 181: 593, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 21’
   Google Scholar
• Björnberg A. Skin reactions to primary irritants and predisposition to eczema. Brit. J. Dermatol. 1974; 91: 425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skög E. Primary irritant and allergic eczematous reactions in patients with different dermatoses. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1960; 40: 307
   Google Scholar
• Bettley F. R., Grice K. A. The effect of sweating on patch test reactions to soap. Brit. J. Dermatol. 1966; 78: 636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biberstein H. The effect of unilateral cervical sympathectomy on reactions of the skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1940; 3: 201
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer W. Beiträge zum klinischen studium und der quantitativen prüfung der hautreaktion auf chemische reize. II. über die chemische hautreaktion bei peripheren und zentralen lähmungen. Arch. Derm, u. Syph. 1921; 132: 87, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 35
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann F., Winkel M. Entzündung und nervensystem. Klin, Woschr. 1922; 1: 12, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 35
   Google Scholar
• Halter K. Zur pathogenese des ekzems. Arch. Derm. u. Syph. 1941; 181: 593, cited by Björnberg ‘7’, 35
   Google Scholar
• Foster R. W., Ramaze A. G. Evidence for a specific somatosensory receptor in the cat skin that responds to irritant chemicals. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 1976; 57: 436P
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilzen A., Wikstrom K. Factors influencing the skin reaction in guinea pigs sensitized with 2,4‐dinitrochlorobenzene. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1955; 35: 415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman L., Preston R., Rockwell E. The local effect of 17‐hydroxycorticosterone‐21‐acetate (Compound F) on the diagnostic patch test reaction. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1952; 18: 89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerman E., Levy A. A study of the effect of prednisone and an antihistamine on patch test reactions. Brit. J. Dermatol. 1972; 86: 68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips L., Steinberg M., Maibach H. I., Akers W. A. A comparison of rabbit and human skin responses to certain irritants. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1972; 21: 369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C. 1977
   Google Scholar
• Marzulli F. N., Maibach H. I. The rabbit as a model for evaluating skin irritants: a comparison of results in animals and man using repeated skin exposures. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1975; 13: 533
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinberg M., Akers W. A., Weeks M., McCreesh A. H., Maibach H. I. A Comparison of Test Techniques Based on Rabbit and Human Skin Responses to Irritants with Recommendations Regarding the Evaluation of Mildly or Moderately Irritating Compounds. Animal Models in Dermatology, H. I. Maibach. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Thiele F. A. J. Measurements on the Surface of the Skin. Drukkerij van Mammeren B. V., NijmegenThe Netherlands 1974
   Google Scholar
• Grice K., Sattar H., Casey T., Baker H. An evaluation of Na+, Cl−, and pH ion‐specific electrodes in the study of the electrolyte contents of epidermal transudate and sweat. Brit. J. Dermatol. 1975; 92: 511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjo D. M., Cunico R. L., Maibach H. I. Transepidermal chloride diffusion in man. Clin. Res. 1978; 26: 208A
   Google Scholar