Assessing the dermal compatibility of a new female incontinence product line

References

• Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin: women with urinary incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:49–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TW. Prevalence of urinary incontinence. Br Med J 1980;281:1243–1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolleys JV. Reported prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in a general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:1300–1302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagglund D, Olsson H, Leppert J. Urinary incontinence: an unexpected large problem among young females. Results from a population-based study. Fam Pract 1999;16:506–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botlero R, Urquhart DM, Davis SR, Bell RJ. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. Int J Urol 2008;15:230–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Grady D, Ouslander JG, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. Heart & Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:66–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Reilly WT, et al. Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:837–841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville JL, Delaney K, Newton K, Katon W. Incontinence severity and major depression in incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:585–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getliffe K, Fader M, Cottenden A, et al. Absorbent products for incontinence: ‘treatment effects’ and impact on quality of life. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:1936–1945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. Risk assessment in the Federal Government. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1983
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria No. 210. Principles for the assessment of risks to human health from exposure to chemicals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Stadler A, Elsner P, Maibach HI. Safety evaluation of modern hygiene pads: two decades of use. Female Patient 2004;29:23–30
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191–2194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin: changes in perceived severity and associations with environmental causes. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:226–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA. How do perceptions of sensitive skin differ at different anatomical sites? An epidemiological study. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009;34:e521–e530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Meyer S, Walter D. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products. Skin Res Technol 2004;10:73–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Gilpin DA, Enane NA, Baldwin S. Development of a new test for mechanical irritation: behind the knee as a test site. Skin Res Technol 2001;7:193–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Segarra VS, Bramante M, et al. Dermatological testing of an emollient-treated menstrual pad with a novel foam absorbent core. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2008;27:333–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger RS, James PB. A reappraisal of the 21-day cumulative irritation test in man. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1982;1:109–115
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International: Standard D6355-07: Standard test method for human repeat insult patch testing of medical gloves. 2008. Available at: www.astm.org [accessed 8 Jul 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Gerberick GF, Sikorski EE. In vitro and in vivo testing techniques for allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998;9:111–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin C. Animal human, and in vitro test methods for predicting skin irritation. In: Zhai H, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CRC Press; 2004:677–693
   Google Scholar
• Marzulli FN, et al. Test methods for allergic contact dermatitis in humans. In: Zhai H, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CRC Press; 2004:677–693
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International: Standard F2808-10: Standard test method for performing Behind-the-Knee (BTK) Test for evaluating skin irritation response to products and materials that come into repeated or extended Contact with Skin. 2010. Available at: www.astm.org [accessed 8 Jul 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Meyer S, Walter D. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin. Skin Res Technol 2004;10:85–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morel JG, Bokossa MC, Neerchal NK. Small sample correction for the variance of GEE estimators. Biometric J 2003;45:395–409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Psychosocial and societal burden of incontinence in the aged population: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;277:285–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stach-Lempinen B, Hakala AL, Laippala P, et al. Severe depression determines quality of life in urinary incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:563–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry S, McGrother CW, Turner K. An investigation of the relationship between anxiety and depression and urge incontinence in women: development of a psychological model. Br J Health Psychol 2006;11:463–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery JC, Stocks NP, Duggan P, et al. Identifying the quality of life effects of urinary incontinence with depression in an Australian population. BMC Urol 2013;13:11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung KJ, Awtrey CS, Tsai AC. Urinary incontinence, depression, and economic outcomes in a cohort of women between the ages of 54 and 65 years. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:822–827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosemund K, Schlatter H, Ochsenhirt JL, et al. Safety evaluation of superabsorbent baby diapers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2009;53:81–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farage MA. Evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation using the behind-the-knee test: a review. In: Wilhelm K-P, Zhai H, Maibach HI, eds. Marzulli and Maibach's dermatotoxicology. 8th ed. London: Informa Healthcare, Inc; 2012:406–413
   Google Scholar
• Farage MA, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sensitive skin: a valid syndrome of multiple origins. In: Wilhelm K-P, Zhai H, Maibach HI, eds. Marzulli and Maibach's dermatotoxicology. 8th ed. London: Informa Healthcare, Inc; 2012:238–247
   Google Scholar
• Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin: women with urinary incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:49–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar