Disentangling practitioners’ perceptions of substance use severity: A factorial survey

References

• Abrahamson M, Heimdahl K. Gendered discourse in Swedish national alcohol policy action plans 1965–2007. Invisible men and problematic women. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2010; 27: 63–85
   Google Scholar
• Bennett LA, Janca A, Grant BF, Sartorius N. Boundaries between normal and pathological drinking: A cross-cultural comparison. Alcohol Health and Research World 1993; 17: 190–195
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark A. Om medikaliseringen av svensk missbrukarvård [The medicalization of Swedish treatment of substance abuse]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 2012; 19: 232–242
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist J. What is the worst thing you could get hooked on? Popular images of addiction problems in contemporary Sweden. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2009; 26: 373–398
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist J. Perceptions of addiction and recovery in Sweden: The influence of respondent characteristics. Addiction Research and Theory 2012; 20: 435–446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist J, Cunningham J, Wallander L, Collin L. Att förbättra sina dryckesvanor – om olika mönster för förändring och om vad vården betyder [Improving one's alcohol habits – on patterns of change and the significance of treatment]. Report No. 42. SoRAD, Stockholm 2007
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist J, Palm J, Storbjörk J. ‘More cure and less control’ or ‘more care and lower costs’? Recent changes in services for problem drug users in Stockholm and Sweden. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy 2009; 16: 479–496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin FC, Gladwin CH, Borsoi D, Cunningham JA. Defacto client-treatment matching: How clinicians make referrals to outpatient treatments for substance use. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000; 23: 281–291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAN (2011). Skolelevers drogvanor [Drug habits among school pupils]. Report No. 129. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs.
   Google Scholar
• CAN (2012). Ungas frågor om alkohol och droger [Young people's questions about alcohol and drugs]. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs.
   Google Scholar
• Connell RW. Masculinities. Allen & Unwin, Sydney 1995
   Google Scholar
• Connell RW. Om genus [On gender]. Diadalos, Uddevalla 2003
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan PW, Watson AC, Miller FE. Blame, shame, and contamination: The impact of mental illness and drug dependence stigma on family members. Journal of Family Psychology 2006; 20: 239–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science Medicine 2000; 50: 1385–1401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 1990; 43: 1241–1299
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham JA, Blomqvist J, Koski-Jännes A, Raitasalo K. Societal images of Cannabis use: Comparing three countries. Harm Reduction Journal 2012; 9: 1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald J, McCarty D. Understanding attitudes toward use of medication in substance abuse treatment: A multilevel approach. Psychological Services 2009; 6: 74–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassman RA, Weisner C. Community providers’ views of alcohol problems and drug problems. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions 2005; 5: 101–115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierson M, Hensing G, Spak F. Does gender matter? A vignette study of general practitioners’ management skills in handling patients with alcohol-related problems. Alcohol & Alcoholism 2009; 44: 620–625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gmel G, Kuntsche E, Rehm J. Risky single occasion drinking: Bingeing is not bingeing. Addiction 2011; 106: 1037–1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield TK, Room R. Situational norms for drinking and drunkenness: Trends in the US adult population, 1979–1990. Addiction 1997; 92: 33–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensing G, Spak F. Gendering socio cultural alcohol and drug research. Alcohol & Alcoholism 2009; 44: 602–606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschovits-Gerz T, Holma K, Koski-Jännes A, Raitasalo K, Blomqvist J, Cunningham JA, Pervova I. Is there something peculiar about Finnish views on alcohol addiction? – A cross-cultural comparison between four northern populations. Research on Finnish Society 2011; 4: 41–54
   Google Scholar
• Holma K, Koski-Jännes A, Raitasalo K, Blomqvist J, Pervova I, Cunningham JA. Perceptions of addictions as societal problems in Canada, Sweden, Finland and St. Petersburg, Russia. European Addiction Research 2011; 17: 106–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications Quantitative methodology series. Routledge, New York 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hox JJ, Kreft IGG, Hermkens PLJ. The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods & Research 1991; 19: 493–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner L. Narkotika och alkohol i den allmänna opinionen [Drugs and alcohol in public opinion]. Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, Stockholm 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hübner L. Allmänhetens uppfattningar om alkohol och alkoholpolitik. Alkohol och droger [Alcohol and drugs], K Billinger, L Hübner. Gleerups, Malmö 2009; 39–54
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson A, Hensing G, Spak F. The role of gendered conceptions in treatment seeking for alcohol problems. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 2008; 22: 196–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser LR. State bureaucratic discretion and the administration of social welfare programs: The case of social security disability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1999; 9: 87–106
   Google Scholar
• Kim J. Multilevel analysis: An overview and some contemporary issues. The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, R Millsap, A Maydeu-Olivares. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2009; 337–362
   Google Scholar
• Koski-Jännes A, Hirschovits-Gerz T, Pennonen M. Population, professional, and client support for different models of managing addictive behaviors. Substance Use and Misuse 2012; 47: 296–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg C, Fäldt J. Gender differences in social workers' assessments and help-giving strategies towards single parents. European Journal of Social Work 2008; 11: 445–458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Molnár V. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 2002; 28: 167–195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russel Sage Foundation, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Lordan EJ, Kelley JM, Peters CP, Siegfried RJ. Treatment placement decisions: How substance abuse professionals assess and place clients. Evaluation and Program Planning 1997; 20: 137–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwick R, Wright ME, Zeller RA, Dowding DW, Lauder W, Winchell J. An improved methodology for advancing nursing research: Factorial surveys. Advances in Nursing Science 2004; 27: 224–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson T. Intersektionalitet i socialt arbete [Intersectionality in social work]. Gleerup, Malmö 2010
   Google Scholar
• McCall L. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs 2005; 30: 1771–1800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mion LC, Sandhu SK, Khan RH, Ludwick R, Pile J, Harrington M, Winchell J, et al. Effect of situational and clinical variables on the likelihood of physicians ordering physical restraints. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2010; 58: 1279–1288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlund S. What is alcohol abuse? Changes in Norwegians’ perceptions of drinking practices since the 1960s. Addiction Research and Theory 2008; 16: 85–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt DJ, King LA, Phillips LD, Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs. Drug harms in the UK: A multi-criteria decision analysis. The Lancet 2010; 376: 1558–1565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien LJ, Rossi PH, Tessler RC. How much is too much? Measuring popular conceptions of drinking problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1982; 43: 96–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öjesjö L. The recovery from alcohol problems over the life course. The Lundby longitudinal study, Sweden. Alcohol 2000; 22(1)1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole R, Webster SW, O'Toole AW, Lucal B. Teachers' recognition and reporting of child abuse: A factorial survey. Child Abuse and Neglect 1999; 23: 1083–1101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm J. The nature of and responsibility for alcohol and drug problems: Views among treatment staff. Addiction Research & Theory 2004; 12: 413–431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramstedt M, Boman U, Engdahl B, Sohlberg T, Svensson J. Tal om alkohol [Numbers on alcohol]. Report No. 60. SoRAD, Stockholm 2010
   Google Scholar
• Rattray JE, Ludwick R, Johnstone C, Zeller R, Winchell J, Myers E, Smith A. Indicators of acute deterioration in adult patients nursed in acute wards: A factorial survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2011; 20: 723–732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon R, du Toit M. HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. SSI Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL 2011
   Google Scholar
• Room R. Governing images of alcohol and drug problems: The structure, sources and sequels of conceptualizations of intractable problems. University of California, Berkeley, CA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Room R. The dangerousness of drugs. Addiction 2005; 101: 166–168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenqvist P, Kurube N. Dissolving the Swedish alcohol treatment system. Cure, care, or control: Alcoholism treatment in sixteen countries, H Klingemann, J-P Takala, G Hunt. State University of New York Press, Albany 1992; 65–86
   Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Anderson AB. The factorial survey approach: An introduction. Measuring social judgements – The factorial survey approach, PH Rossi, SL Nock. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1982; 15–68
   Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Nock SL. Measuring social judgements – The factorial survey approach. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson E, Blomqvist J, Christophs I. Addiction and recovery: Perceptions among professionals in the Swedish treatment system. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2013; 30: 51–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer C, Auspurg K, Hinz T, Liebig S. The application of factorial surveys in general population samples: The effects of respondent age and education on response times and response consistency. Survey Research Methods 2011; 5: 89–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogens L. Hur bemöts manliga socialbidragstagare med alkoholproblem? – regler, kunskap och kontext i socialt arbete [How are drinking problems in single, male clients receiving social assistance approached?]. Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, Stockholm 2007
   Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB. Multilevel analysis. The Sage encyclopaedia of social science research methods, MS Lewis-Beck, A Bryman, T Futing Liao. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2004; 673–677
   Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage Publications, London 2012
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2011:35 Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende [Improved interventions for substance abuse and dependence – the individual, knowledge and responsibility]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Socio-ekonomisk indelning (SEI) [Swedish Socioeconomic Classification]. MiS 1982:4. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm 1982
   Google Scholar
• Stenius K, Witbrodt J, Engdahl B, Weisner C. For the marginalized or for the integrated? A comparative study of addiction treatment system in Sweden and the United States. Contemporary Drug Problems 2010; 37: 417–448
   Google Scholar
• Storbjörk J, Room R. The two worlds of alcohol problems: Who is in treatment and who is not?. Addiction Research and Theory 2008; 16: 67–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Narkotikabruket i Sverige [Use of narcotics in Sweden]. Report No.13. Statens folkhälsoinstitut, Östersund 2010
   Google Scholar
• Taylor BJ. Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgement. British Journal of Social Work 2006; 36: 1187–1207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander L, (2012). Measuring social workers' judgements: Why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgements. Journal of Social Work, 12,364–384
   Google Scholar
• Wallander L, Blomqvist J. Modeling ideal treatment recommendations: A factorial survey of Swedish social workers' ideal recommendations of inpatient or outpatient treatment for problem substance users. Journal of Social Service Research 2008; 35: 47–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierup L, de la Reguera E. Kokain – Drogen som fick medelklassen att börja knarka och länder att falla samman [Cocaine – The drug which made the middle-class start taking drugs and caused countries to collapse]. Norstedts, Stockholm 2010
   Google Scholar