From self-regulation to regulation – An analysis of gambling policy reform in Finland

References

• Adams, P.J., & Livingstone, C. (2015). Addiction surplus: The add-on margin that makes addictive consumptions difficult to contain. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26, 107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartle, I., & Vass, P. (2007). Self-regulation within the regulatory state: Towards a new regulatory paradigm? Public Administration, 85, 885–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beem, B., & Mikler, J. (2011). National regulations for a borderless industry: US versus UK approaches to online gambling. Policy and Society, 30, 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2002). Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 301–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros Örnberg, J., & Tammi, T. (2011). Gambling problems as a political framing: Safeguarding the monopolies in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Gambling Issues, (26), 110–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2002). Liberal government and authoritarianism. Economy and Society, 31, 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2007). Governing societies. Political perspectives on domestic and international rule. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (2008). Michel Foucault and liberal intelligence. Economy and Society, 37, 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H.L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engau, C., & Hoffmann, V.H. (2011). Corporate response strategies to regulatory uncertainty: Evidence from uncertainty about post-Kyoto regulation. Policy Sciences, 44, 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). Afterword. The subject and power. In H.L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. (2nd ed.). (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse (C. Gordon, Trans.). In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 53–72). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2010). The archaeology of knowledge (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Franzosi, R.P. (2004). Content analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 548–566). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gond, J., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40, 640–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Proposal. (2008). Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laeiksi arpajaislain sekä eräiden markkinaoikeudellisten asioiden käsittelystä annetun lain 2 ja 7 §:n muuttamisesta [A government proposal to the parliament concerning the amendment of the Lotteries Act and articles 2 and 7 of the Act on the Processing of certain Market Law Issues]. Government proposal 96/2008. Retrieved from http://finlex.fi/fi/esitykset/he/2008/20080096.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M.D. (2009). Minimizing harm from gambling: What is the gambling industry’s role? Addiction, 104, 696–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, J., Laine J., & Salokoski T. (2009). Rahapelien haitta-arviointi [Harm assessment of money games]. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekx, N. (2008). Placanica: Combating criminality vs. reducing gambling opportunities as grounds for justification in the ECJ’s jurisprudence. In T. Spapens, A. Littler, & C. Fijnaut (Eds.), Crime, addiction and the regulation of gambling (pp. 69–92). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen-Tassopoulos, J. (2011). Rahapelipolitiikkaa eurooppalaisissa raameissa [Gambling policy in the European context]. In M. Niemelä & J. Saari (Eds.), Politiikan polut ja hyvinvointivaltion muutos [Paths of politics and change in the welfare state] (pp. 272–293). Helsinki: Kelan tutkimusosasto.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, S. (2004). Gambling and the risk society: The liberalisation and legitimation crisis of gambling in the Netherlands. International Gambling Studies, 4, 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, S. (2015). Paradoxes of risk management: Social responsibility and self-exclusions in Dutch casinos. Culture and Organization, 21, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusch, M. (1991). Foucault’s strata and fields. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, C. (2005). Desire and the consumption of danger. Electronic gaming machines and the commodification of interiority. Addiction Research & Theory, 13, 523–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, C., & Adams, P.J. (2011). Harm promotion. Observations on the symbiosis between government and private industries in Australasia for the development of highly accessible gambling markets. Addiction, 106, 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, C., & Woolley, R. (2007). Risky business. A few provocations on the regulation of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 7, 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• Lotteries Act (1047/2001). (2001). Retrieved from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2001/20011047
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2003). Self-regulation, taxation and public voluntary environmental agreements. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1453–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, F., & Young, M. (2015). “Big Gambling”: The rise of the global industry-state gambling complex. Addiction Research & Theory, 23, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior, Finland. (2008). Arpajaislakihankkeen väliraportti [The interim report of the Lotteries Act amendment project]. Helsinki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior, Finland. (2012). Ehdotus rahapeleihin kytkeytyvien haittojen arviointijärjestelmäksi [A proposal for a harm assessment system of money games]. Helsinki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior, Finland. (2014). Rahapelien toimeenpanoa koskevien haittariskien ja haittojen arvioinnin käynnistäminen [The commencement of the assessment of risks and harms associated with money games]. Helsinki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, C., & Hastings, G. (2008). Gambling with the future of young people. Addiction Research & Theory, 16, 107–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland. (2011). Lausunto RAY-pelisaleissa, yhteistyökumppaneiden tiloissa sekä pelikasinoissa toimeenpantavien rahapelien sääntöhakemuksesta [A statement regarding a proposal for changing the rules of money games executed in the RAY arcades, in the venues of the partners in cooperation and in the casinos] [Ministry of the Interior file SMDno 2010/1785]. Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland. (2012). Lausunto valtioneuvoston asetuksesta koskien Veikkaus Oy:n rahapelien toimeenpanoa [A statement regarding the government decree on the execution of Veikkaus Ltd’s money games] [Ministry of the Interior file SM039:00/2012]. Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Welfare, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Ministry of the Interior, & National Police Board. (2013). Yearbook of gambling in Finland 2012. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Peliklinikka. (2010). Lausunto Veikkaus Oy:n tapahtuma-aikaisten pelien pelisääntöjen muuttamisesta [A statement regarding the changes in the rules of Veikkaus Ltd’s live-betting games]. [Ministry of the Interior file SMDno 2010/1399]. Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T., & Ronit, K. (2006). Self-regulation as policy process: The multiple and criss-crossing stages of private rule-making. Policy Sciences, 39, 41–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raento, P. (2014). New forms of gambling and gambling studies in Finland. In P. Raento (Ed.), Gambling in Finland (pp. 9–27). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Rahapelifoorumi. (2006). Suomalainen rahapeli-, bingopeli-, tavara-arpajais- ja rahankeräyspolitiikka [The Finnish gambling, bingo, prize draw, and money-raising policy]. Helsinki: Sisäasiainministeriö.
   Google Scholar
• Reith, G. (2008). Reflections on responsibility. Journal of Gambling Issues, (22), 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Reith, G. (2013). Techno economic systems and excessive consumption. A political economy of ‘pathological’ gambling. British Journal of Sociology, 64, 717–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudder, C.E. (2008). Private governance as public policy: A paradigmatic shift. The Journal of Politics, 70, 899–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, L.L., Teret, S.P., & Brownell, K.D. (2010). The food industry and self-regulation: Standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, R. (2010). Capitalism, governance, and authority. The case of corporate social responsibility. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 531–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spapens, T. (2008). Regulating illegal gambling markets: The case of illegal casinos in the Netherlands. In: T. Spapens, A. Littler, C. Fijnaut (Eds.), Crime, addiction and the regulation of gambling (pp. 93–107). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Steurer, R. (2010). The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Sciences, 43, 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammi, T. (2008). Monopoly on gambling, monopoly on problems: Why did gambling problems become a matter of social concern in Finland? Nordisk Alkohol & Narkotikatidskrift, 25, 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• The Finnish Slot machine Association [RAY]. (2011). Vastuu-ja vuosiraportti 2010 [RAY’s Social responsibility and Annual report 2010]. Espoo: Raha-automaattiyhdistys. Retrieved from http://www2.ray.fi/sites/default/files/Vuosiraportit/RAY_VSK_2010_72dpi_5280.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Finnish Slot machine Association [RAY]. (2012). Pyyntö liittyen sääntömuutoshakemukseenne (Blackjack ym.) [A request regarding your proposal for a change of rules (Blackjack etc.)] [Ministry of the Interior file SMDno 2010/1785]. Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• The National Police Board, Finland. (2010). Lausunto RAY-pelisaleissa, yhteistyökumppaneiden tiloissa sekä pelikasinoissa toimeenpantavien rahapelien sääntöhakemuksesta [A statement regarding the proposal for changing the rules of money games executed in the RAY arcades, in the venues of the partners in cooperation, and in the casinos] [Ministry of the Interior file SMDno 2010/1785]. Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• The National Police Board, Finland. (2011). Poliisihallituksen lausunto koskien ray.fi -pelimaailman esittelykiertuetta [The National Police Board’s statement regarding the promotion tour of the ray.fi online casino] [National Police Board file 2020/2011/901]. Riihimäki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The National Police Board, Finland. (2013a). Poliisihallituksen lausunto koskien Veikkaus Oy:n markkinointia K-Citymarketin Mammuttimarkkinoilla [The National Police Board’s statement regarding Veikkaus Ltd’s marketing during the K-Citymarket’s Mammoth Market] [National Police Board file 2020/2012/3724]. Riihimäki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The National Police Board, Finland. (2013b). Poliisihallituksen lausunto koskien Fintoto Oy:n Laukka -markkinointikampanjaa [The National Police Board’s statement regarding Fintoto Ltd’s “The Turf” marketing campaign] [National Police Board file 2020/2013/1839]. Riihimäki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The National Police Board, Finland. (2014). Poliisihallituksen lausunto koskien Veikkaus Oy:n urheilupelien markkinointia [The National Police Board’s statement regarding Veikkaus Ltd’s marketing of sports games] [National Police Board file 2020/2013/2371]. Riihimäki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vallentin, S., & Murillo, D. (2012). Governmentality and the politics of CSR. Organization, 19, 825–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veikkaus. (2008). Veikkauksen vuosi 2007. Vuosikertomus ja yhteiskuntavastuuraportti [Veikkaus’ Annual report and Corporate social responsibility report]. Vantaa: Author. Retrieved from: https://cms.veikkaus.fi/site/binaries/content/assets/dokumentit/vuosikertomus/vuosiraportti_2007_suomi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veikkaus. (2010). Perustelumuistio. Tapahtuma-aikaisen vedonlyönnin sääntömuutos [A memorandum of justification. The change of rules of live-betting] [Ministry of the Interior file SMDno 2010/1399]. Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Veikkaus. (2011). Veikkaus Oy:n pelien markkinointi Riihimäen K-Citymarketissa [The marketing of Veikkaus Ltd’s products at the K-Citymarket located in Riihimäki] [National Police Board file 2020/2011/4539]. Riihimäki: The National Police Board.
   Google Scholar
• Veikkaus. (2013a). Yhteiskuntavastuuraportti ja vuosikertomus 2012 [Veikkaus’ Corporate social responsibility report and Annual report 2012]. Vantaa: Author. Retrieved from: http://veikkaus-reports.studio.crasman.fi/file/dl/i/rOMe7g/FgygBl8rvxpmYJYcjvz6dQ/Veikkaus_yhteiskuntavastuuraporttijavuosikertomus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veikkaus. (2013b). Veikkaus Oy:n selvitys 22.3.2013 annettuun lausuntoon liittyen [Veikkaus Ltd’s account regarding the statement given on 22 March 2013] [National Police Board file 2020/2012/3724]. Riihimäki: The National Police Board.
   Google Scholar
• Veikkaus. (2014). Veikkaus Oy:n selvitys 9.4.2014 annettuun selvityspyyntöön [Veikkaus Ltd’s account regarding the request for comment given on 9 April 2014] [National Police Board file POL-2014-4481]. Riihimäki: The National Police Board.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohs, K.D., & Baumeister, R.F. (2009). Addiction and free will. Addiction Research & Theory, 17, 231–235.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Statistics, scapegoats and social control: A critique of pathological gambling prevalence research. Addiction Research & Theory, 21, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar