473
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Multispecies toxicity test for silver nanoparticles to derive hazardous concentration based on species sensitivity distribution for the protection of aquatic ecosystems

, , , , &
Pages 521-530 | Received 12 Mar 2015, Accepted 27 Aug 2015, Published online: 04 Dec 2015

References

  • Aschberger K, Micheletti C, Sokull-Klüttgen B, Christensen FM. 2011. Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health – lessons learned from four case studies. Environ Intern 37:1143–56
  • ASTM. 1982. Standard test methods for zeta potential of colloids in water and waste water. D 4187–82
  • Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ANZECC & ARMCANZ). 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality
  • Bar-Ilan O, Albrecht RM, Fako VE, Furgeson DY. 2009. Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Small 5:1897–910
  • Batley GE, Kirby JK, Mclaughlin MJ. 2013. Fate and risks of nanomaterials in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Acc Chem Res 6:854–62
  • Baun A, Justesen KB, Nyholm N, 2002. Algal test with soil suspensions and elutriates: a comparative evaluation for PAH-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 46:251–58
  • Blaise C, Vasseur P. 2005. Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations. In: Blaise C, Férard JF, eds. Toxicity Test Methods. Vol. 1. The Netherlands: Springer, 137–39
  • Bottero J-Y, Auffan M, Rose J, Mouneyrac C, Botta C, Labille J, et al. 2011. Manufactured metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles: properties and perturbing mechanisms of their biological activity in ecosystems. Comptes Rendus Geosci 343:168–76
  • Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2007. A protocol for the derivation of WQG for the protection of aquatic life 2007
  • Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2014. Water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Available at: http://st-ts.ccme.ca/en/index.html?chems=all&chapters=1. Accessed on 9 December 2014
  • Cho JG, Kim KT, Ryu TK, Lee JW, Kim JE, Kim J, et al. 2013. Stepwise embryonic toxicity of silver nanoparticles on Oryzias latipes. BioMed Res Int 2013:494671
  • Christensen FM, Johnston HJ, Stone V, et al. 2010. Nano-silver-feasibility and challenges for human health risk assessment based on open literature. Nanotoxicology 4:284–95
  • Dewez D, Oukarroum A. 2012. Silver nanoparticles toxicity effect on photosystem II photochemistry of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii treated in light and dark conditions. Toxicol Environ Chem 94:1536–46
  • European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). 2011. Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document No. 27. Technical guidance for deriving environmental quality standards
  • European Commision Joint Research Centre (EC JRC). 2011. Engineered Nanoparticles – review of Health and Environmental Safety (ENRHES). Available at: http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/whats-new/enhres-final-report. Accessed on 15 April 2011
  • Finney DJ. 1952. Probit analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
  • Gaiser BK, Biswas A, Rosenkranz P, Jepson MA, Lead JR, Stone V, et al. 2011. Effects of silver and cerium dioxide micro- and nano-sized particles on Daphnia magna. J Environ Monitor 13:1227–35
  • Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz R, Nowack B. 2009. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–22
  • Gubbins EJ, Batty LC, Lead JR. 2011. Phytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles to Lemna minor L. Environ Pollut 159:1551–99
  • Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV. 1977. Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 11:714–19
  • Kim SW, An Y-J. 2012. Effect of ZnO and TiO2 nanparticles preilluminated with UVA and UVB light on Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:243–53
  • Kim SW, Baek YW, An Y-J. 2011. Assay-dependent effect of silver nanoparticles to Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:1045–52
  • McTeer J, Dean AP, White KN, Pittman JK. 2014. Bioaccumulation of silver nanoparticles into Daphnia magna from a freshwater algal diet and the impact of phosphate availability. Nanotoxicology 8:305–16
  • Müller N. 2007. Nanoparticles in the environment. Risk assessment based on exposure-modelling [Diploma thesis]. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich
  • Mueller N, Nowack B. 2008. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–53
  • Nam S-H, Shin Y-J, Lee W-M, Kim SW, Kwak JI, Yoon S-J, An Y-J. 2015. Conducting a battery of bioassays for gold nanoparticles to derie guideline value for the protection of aquatic ecosystems. Nanotoxicology 9:326–35
  • National institute of public health and the environment (RIVM). 2004. ETX program (ver. 2.0). developed and built at the RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
  • Navarro E, Piccapietra F, Wagner B, Marconi F, Kaegi R, Odzak N, et al. 2008. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environ Scie Technol 42:8959–64
  • Noble AJ, Lacerda AF. 2014. Intracellular interaction of spherical antimicrobial nanoparticles of silver on freshwater protozoan Euglena gracilis. J Adv Microscopy Res 9:179–85
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1998. Guideline for testing of chemicals No. 212. Fish, short-term toxicity test on embryo and sac-fry stages
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2004. Guideline for testing of chemicals No. 202. Daphnia sp., acute immobilisation test
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2011. Guideline for testing of chemicals No. 201. In freshwater alga and cyanobacteria, growth inhibition test
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2012. Guideline for testing of chemicals No. 211. Daphnia magna reproduction test
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2013. Guideline for testing of chemicals No. 236. Fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test
  • Park S-Y, Choi JH. 2010. Geno- and ecotoxicity evaluation of silver nanoparticles in freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna. Environ Eng Res 15:23–7
  • Piccapietra F, Allué CG, Sigg L, Behra R. 2012. Intracellular silver accumulation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii upon exposure to carbonate coated silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate. Environ Sci Technol 46:7390–7
  • Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN). 2014. Consumer products inventory. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/browse/nanomaterials/silver-nanoparticle/. Accessed on 9 December 2014
  • Ribeiro F, Gallego-Urrea JA, Jurkschat K, Crossley A, Hassellöv M, Taylor C, et al. 2014. Silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate induce high toxicity to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio. Sci Total Environ 466–467:232–41
  • Retsinformation, Denmark. 2014. Order on environmental quality standards for water bodies and requirements for the discharge of pollutants into rivers, lakes or the ocean. Available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132956#Not1. Accessed on 9 December 2014
  • Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). 2010. Environmental standards for discharges to surface waters
  • Seitz F, Rosenfeldt RR, Storm K, Metreveli G, Schaumann GE, Schulz R, Bundschuh M. 2015. Effects of silver nanoparticles properties, media pH and dissolved organic matter on toxicity to Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 111:263–70
  • Silva T, Pokhrel LR, Dubey B, Tolaymat TM, Maier KJ, Liu X. 2014. Particle size, surface charge and concentration dependent ecotoxicity of three organo-coated silver nanoparticles: comparison between general linear model-predicted and observed toxicity. Sci Total Environ 468–469:968–76
  • Stevenson LM, Dickson H, Klanjscek T, Keller AA, McCauley E, Nisbet RM. 2013. Environmental feedbacks and engineered nanoparticles – mitigation of silver. PLoS One 8:e74456
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1985. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. EPA 822/R-85-100
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999a. Trimmed Spearman-Karber estimation of LC50 values users' manual, in, U. S. EPA, Office of research and development, National exposure research laboratory-ecosystems research division, Center for exposure assessment modeling (CEAM), Athens, Georgia
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999b. Dunnett program version 1.5 users' manual, in, U. S. EPA, Environmental monitorign systems laboratory, Ecological monitoring research division, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, EPA/812/R/02/012. Office of Water, Washington, DC
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. National recommended water quality criteria
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2010. Nanomaterial case studies: nanoscale titanium dioxide in water treatment and in topical sunscreen
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. Nanomaterial case studies: nanoscale silver in disinfectant spray
  • Völker C, Boedicker C, Daubenthaler J, Oetken M, Oehlmann J. 2013. Comparative toxicity assessment of nanosilver on three Daphnia species in acute, chronic and multi-generation experiments. PLoS One 8:e75026
  • Wijnhoven SWP, Peijnenburg WJGM, Herberts CA, Hagens WI, Oomen AG, Heugens EHW, et al. 2009. Nano-silver-a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology 3:109–38
  • Zhao C-M, Wang W-X. 2012a. Size-dependent uptake of silver nanoparticles in Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol 46:11345–51

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.