Assessing the protection of the nanomaterial workforce

References

• Aitken R, Creely K, Tran C. 2004. Nanoparticles: An Occupational Hygiene Review. Norwich, UK: HSE Books
   Google Scholar
• Ambroise D, Wild P, Moulin JJ. 2006. Update of a meta-analysis on lung cancer and welding. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:22–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonini JM, Stone S, Roberts JR, Chen B, Schwegler-Berry D, Afshari AA, Frazer DG. 2007. Effect of short-term stainless steel welding fume inhalation exposure on lung inflammation, injury, and defense responses in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 223:234–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbach C, Kuhlbusch T, Stahlmecke B, Kaminski H, Kiesling M, Voetz M, et al. 2015. Measurement and monitoring strategy for assessing workplace exposure to airborne nanomaterials. In: Wohlleben W, Kuhlbusch T, Lehr C, Schnekenburger J, eds. Safety of Nanomaterials along their Lifecycle: Release, Exposure and Human Hazard. New York: Taylor and Francis, 233–46
   Google Scholar
• BAuA (BundesanstaltfürArbeitsschutzundArbeitsmedizin). Guidance for handling and use of nanomaterials at the workplace. Available at: http://www.baua.de/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/Hazardous-Substances/Nanotechnology/pdf/guidance.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2,2007
   Google Scholar
• Bergamaschi E, Poland C, Guseva Canu I, Prina-Mello A. 2015. The role of biological monitoring in nano-safety. Nano Today 10:274–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borm PJ, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, et al. 2006. The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:11. doi:10.1186/1746-8977-3-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI. 2007. Guide to Safe Handling and Disposal of Manufactured Nanomaterials. London: British Standard Institution PD 6699–2, 32p
   Google Scholar
• Castranova V. 2000. From coal mine dust to quartz: mechanisms of pulmonary pathogenicity. Inhal Toxicol 12:7–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN (de Comité Normalisation Européen). 2012. EN482. Workplace Exposure – General Requirements for the Performance of Procedures for the Measurement of Chemical Agents. Brussels, Belgium: Comité Européende Normalisation (CEN)
   Google Scholar
• Chalupa DC, Morrow PE, Oberdörster G, Utell MJ, Frampton MW. 2004. Ultrafine particle deposition in subjects with asthma. Environ Health Perspect 112:879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm MM, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Evans DE, Birch ME, Fernback JE, Deddens JA. 2015. Carbon nanotube and nanofiber exposure assessments: an analysis of 14 site visits. Ann Occup Hyg 6:705–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, et al. 1993. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, Tran L, Jimenez LA, Duffin R, Newby DE, Mills N, et al. 2005. Combustion-derived nanoparticles: a review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure. Part Fibre Toxicol 2:10–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Defense Fund. 2007. Nanorisk framework. DuPont. Available at: http://qsinano.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/nano_risk_framework_dupont.pdf. Accessed on 5 January 2016
   Google Scholar
• Erdely A, Liston A, Salmen-Muniz R, Hulderman T, Young SH, Zeidler-Erdely PC, et al. 2011. Identification of systemic markers from a pulmonary carbon nanotube exposure. J Occup Environ Med 53:S80–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2013. Survey of Nanomaterial Risk Management Practices. vol. 78 Washington, DC: Federal Register
   Google Scholar
• Garshick E, Laden F, Hart JE, Rosner B, Smith TJ, Dockery DW, Speizer FE. 2004. Lung cancer in railroad workers exposed to diesel exhaust. Environ Health Perspect 112:1539–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guseva Canu I, Boutou-Kempf O, Delabre L, Ducamp S, Iwatsubo Y, Marchand JL, Imbernon E. 2013. French registry of workers handling engineered nanomaterials as an instrument of integrated system for surveillance and research. J Phys: Conf Series 429 (1) doi:10:1088/1742-6596/429/1/012066
   Google Scholar
• Guseva Canu I, Ducros C, Ducamp S, Delabre L, Audignon-Durand S, Durand C, et al. 2015. Standardized non-instrumental tool for characterizing workstations concerned with exposure to engineered nanomaterials. J Phys: Conf Serv 617. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/617/1/012036
   Google Scholar
• Gwinn MR, Vallyathan V. 2006. Nanoparticles: health effects-pros and cons. Environ Health Perspect 114:1818–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon JJ. 1974. Public Health. Administration and Practice. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Company
   Google Scholar
• Hett A. 2004. Nanotechnology: Small Matter, Many Unknowns. Zurich: Swiss Reinsurance Company
   Google Scholar
• HSE. 2004. Nanotechnology. Horizons Scanning Information Note No. HSIN1. London: Health and Safety Executive
   Google Scholar
• Iavicoli I, Leso V, Manno M, Schulte PA. 2014. Biomarkers of nanomaterial exposure and effect: current status. J Nanopart Res 16:1–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iavicoli I, Leso V, Schulte PA. 2016. Biomarkers of susceptibility: state of the art and implications for occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, in press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibald-Mulli A, Wichmann HE, Kreyling W, Peters A. 2002. Epidemiological evidence on health effects of ultrafine particles. J Aerosol Med 15:189–201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Institut for Arbeitsschutzder Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA). 2009. Criteria for Assessment of the Effectiveness of Protective Measures. Germany: IFA
   Google Scholar
• Kortum E. 2015. Developing WHO guidelines for protecting workers from potential risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Available at: http://www.nanotec.or.th/en/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/WHO-V-Murashov_NANO-HEALTH.pdf. Accessed on 5 January 2016
   Google Scholar
• Levy BS, Wegman PH, eds. 1983. Occupational Health: Recognizing and Preventing Work-related Disease. Boston: Little Brown and Company
   Google Scholar
• Manno M, Viau C, Cocker J, Colosio C, Lowry L, Mutti A, et al. 2010. Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA). Toxicol Lett 192:3–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Kuempel ED. 2005. Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 2005. Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology: An Information Exchange with NIOSH. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/pdfs/Approaches_to_Safe_Nanotechnology.pdf. Accessed on 13 August 2013
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 2013. Current Intelligence Bulletin 65: Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2013-145
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. 2005. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Yu CP. 1990. The carcinogenic potential of inhaled diesel exhaust: a particle effect? J Aerosol Sci 21:S397–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostiguy C, Lapointe G, Ménard L, Cloutier Y, Trottier M, Boutin M, et al. 2006. Nanoparticles: current knowledge about occupational health and safety risks and prevention measures. Studies and research, IRSST, Report R-470. Montreal: Disponibleen. Available at: http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/pubirsst/r-470.pdf. Accessed on 5 January 2016
   Google Scholar
• Ostiguy C, Roberge B, Woods C, Soucy B. 2010. Nanoparticles: current knowledge about OSH risks and prevention measures. 2nd ed. IRSST Report. R-656. Montreal: Disponibleen. Available at: http://www.irsst.qc.ca/medica/documents/pubirsst/r-456.pdf.[Links]
   Google Scholar
• Pietroiusti A, Magrini A. 2014. Engineered nanoparticles at the workplace: current knowledge about workers risk. Occup Med 64:319–30
   Google Scholar
• Pietropaoli A, Frampton M, Oberdörster G, Cox C, Huang L, Marder V, Utell M. 2004. Blood markers of coagulation and inflammation in healthy human subjects exposed to carbon ultra fine particles. In: Heinrich U, ed. Effects of Air Contaminants on the Respiratory Tract-Interpretations from Molecular to Meta Ananlysis. INIS Monographs. Stuttgart, Germany: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 181–94
   Google Scholar
• Plitzko S, Thim C, Bachmann V. 2013. Zweite Fragebogenaktion zu Aspekten des Arbeitsschutzes bei der Herstellung und bei Tätigkeiten mit Nanomaterialien in Deutschland. Bundesanstalt Für Arbeitsschutz Und Arbeitsmedizin. Gefahrstoffe-Reinhaltlung Luft 73:7–13
   Google Scholar
• Plog BA, Quinlan P. 2002. Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene. 5th ed. Itasa, IL: National Safety Council
   Google Scholar
• Pope III CA, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD. 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 287:1132–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope CA, Burnett RT, Thurston GD, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Godleski JJ. 2004. Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. Circulation 109:71–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen J. 2008. Challenges to global governance in the changing world of work. In: Risks in Modern Society. Netherlands: Springer, 17–59
   Google Scholar
• Riediker M, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Brouwer DH, Nelissen I, Koppen G, Frijns E, et al. 2012. A road map toward a globally harmonized approach for occupational health surveillance and epidemiology in nanomaterial workers. J Occup Environ Med 54:1214–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering
   Google Scholar
• Safe Work Australia. 2010. Work health and safety assessment tool for handling engineered nanomaterials. Available at: http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/at201008workhealthandsafetyassessmenttool. Accessed on 5 January 2016
   Google Scholar
• Schauer JJ. 2003. Evaluation of elemental carbon as a marker for diesel particulate matter. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 13:443–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid A, Goel S, Wang W, Beiu V, Carrara S, Riediker M. 2009. Chances and risk of nanomaterials for health and environment. In: Akan O, Bellavista P, Cao J, Dressler F, Ferrari D, Gerla M, et al., eds. Nature-Net. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 20,128–33
   Google Scholar
• Schubauer-Berigan MK, Dahm MM, Schulte PA, Hodson L, Geraci CL. 2015. Characterizing adoption of precautionary risk management guidance for nanomaterials, an emerging occupational hazard. J Occup Environ Hyg 12:69–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte PA, Geraci CL, Murashov V, Kuempel ED, Zumwalde RD, Castranova V, et al. 2014. Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 16:2153. doi:10.1007/5/1051-013-2153-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte P, Geraci C, Zumwalde R, Hoover M, Kuempel E. 2008. Occupational risk management of engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Hyg 5:239–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte PA, Hauser JE. 2012. The use of biomarkers in occupational health research, practice and policy. Toxicol Lett 213:91–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte PA, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Mayweather C, Geraci CL, Zumwalde R, Mc Kernan JL. 2009. Issues in the development of epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Med 51:323–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte P, Murashov V, Zumwalde R, Kuempel E, Geraci C. 2010. Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art. J Nanopart Res 12:1971–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SER. 2009. Advisory Report 0901. Nanoparticles in the Workplace: Health and Safety Precautions. The Hague: Social and Economic Council of the Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Potapovich AI, et al. 2005. Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol-Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:L698–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran C, Donaldson K, Stones V, Fernandez T, Ford A, Christofi N, et al. 2005. As Coping Study to Identify Hazard Data Needs for Addressing the Risks Presented by Nanoparticles and Nanotubes. Edinburgh, UK, London: Institute of Occupational Medicine
   Google Scholar