983
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems

Analysis of 3 common stems in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

&
Pages 407-412 | Received 01 Oct 2009, Accepted 23 Mar 2010, Published online: 30 Jun 2010

  • Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87(11):2456-63.
  • Conroy JL, Whitehouse SL, Graves SE, Pratt NL, Ryan P, Crawford RW. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(6):867-72.
  • Davey JR, O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Harris WH. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8(1):23-6.
  • Della Valle AG, Zoppi A, Peterson MG, Salvati EA. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem. Clin Orthop 2005; (436):158-63.
  • Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997; (344):44-60.
  • Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(2):111-21.
  • Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop 1998; (355):163-70.
  • Kärrholm JGG, Herberts P. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2005. Göteborg: Dept of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital; 2006.
  • Kärrholm JGG, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Svenska Höftprotesregistret, Årsrapport 2007 för verksamhetsåret 2007. Göteborg: Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salgrenska University Hospital; 2008.
  • McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77(6):865-9.
  • Middleton RG, Howie DW, Costi K, Sharpe P. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation. Clin Orthop 1998; (355):47-56.
  • Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, Johnston RC. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77(9):1315-22.
  • Olofsson K, Digas Kärrholm JG, Influence of design variations on early migration of a cemented stem in THA. Clin Orthop 2006; (448): 67-72.
  • Rockborn P, Olsson SS. Loosening and bone resorption in exeter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75(6):865-8.
  • Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of instability after total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 2001; 32 (4): 543-52, vii.
  • Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methods. Clin Orthop 2001; (390):163-72.
  • Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999; 81(4):481-92.
  • Woolson ST, Rahimtoola ZO. Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14(6):662-8.