Fractures of the proximal humerus

References

• Malgaigne JF. Traité des fractures et des luxations. Paris, 1847.
   Google Scholar
• Vidus Vidius. Artis Medicinalis. In quo agitur de curatione membratim, hoc est, adcapite ad pedes. Vol. V. Frankfurt, 1596.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr AJ, Cooke AM. Fracture Patterns. Lancet 1959; 1: 531-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowelden J, Buhr AJ, Dunbar O. Incidence of fractures inpersons over 35 years of age. Br J Prev Soc Med 1964;18: 130-41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiaer T, Larsen CF, Blicher J. [Proximal fractures of the humerus. An epidemiological and descriptive study of fractures]. Ugeskr Laeger 1986;148: 1894-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989;108: 285-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I. Changes in the incidence of fracture of the upper end of the humerus during a 30-year period. A study of 2125 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(231) :179-82.
   Google Scholar
• Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M, Vuori I. Increasing number and incidence of osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly people. BMJ 1996;313: 1051-2.
   Google Scholar
• Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;(442) :87-92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux A, Decroocq L, El BS, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Trojani C, Boileau P, de PF. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98: 715-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen JB, Schwarz P, Lund B, McNair P, Transbol I. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporos Int 1993;3: 127-32.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen JB, Schwarz P, McNair P, Lund B, Transbol I. Radial and humeral fractures as predictors of subsequent hip, radial or humeral fractures in women, and their seasonal variation. Osteoporos Int 1993;3: 133-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorson S. Management of fractures of the humerus in Ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome: an historical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467: 1907-14.
   Google Scholar
• Brorson S. Management of proximal humeral fractures in the nineteenth century: an historical review of preradiographic sources. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;(469) :1197-206.
   Google Scholar
• Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52: 1077-89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neer CS. Four-segment classification of displaced proximal humeral fractures. Instructional course lectures 1975;24: 160-8.
   Google Scholar
• Neer CS. Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11: 389-400.
   Google Scholar
• Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium- 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21: S1-133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackermann C, Lam Q, Linder P, Kull C, Regazzoni. [Problems in classification of fractures of the proximal humerus]. Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed Berufskr 1986;79: 209-15.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78: 1371-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brien H, Noftall F, MacMaster S, Cummings T, Landells C, Rockwood P. Neer’s classification system: a critical appraisal. J Trauma 1995;38: 257-60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristiansen B, Andersen UL, Olsen CA, Varmarken JE. The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. An assessment of interobserver variation. Skeletal Radiol 1988;17: 420-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75: 1745-50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Koval K, Schoenberg N. Classification of proximal humerus fractures: The contribution of the scapular lateral and axillary radiographs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994;3: 24-7.
   Google Scholar
• Siebenrock KA, Gerber C. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75: 1751-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoden GO, Movin T, Guntner P, Aspelin P, Ahrengart L, Ersmark H, Sperber A. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68: 239-42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoden GO, Movin T, Aspelin P, Guntner P, Shalabi A. 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70: 325-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majed A, Macleod I, Bull AM, Zyto K, Resch H, Hertel R, Reilly P, Emery RJ. Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20(7: 1125-32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein J. Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76: 792-3.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein AH. Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75: 1743-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowell HR. Patient care and scientific freedom. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76: 640-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neer CS. Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76: 789-90.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood CAJr, . Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76: 790.
   Google Scholar
• Hoellen IP, Bauer G, Holbein O. [Prosthetic humeral head replacement in dislocated humerus multi-fragment fracture in the elderly--an alternative to minimal osteosynthesis?]. Zentralbl Chir 1997;122: 994-1001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristiansen B, Kofoed H. Transcutaneous reduction and external fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70: 821-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20: 747-55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J. Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20(7): 1025-33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Tornkvist H. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79: 412-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari M, Matthys G, McKee MD. Four part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18: 126-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD000434.
   Google Scholar
• Kontakis G, Koutras C, Tosounidis T, Giannoudis P. Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90: 1407-13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17: 42-54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N. Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults--a systematic review of management. Injury 2001;32: 363-72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanidis TG, Majed A, Liddle AD, Constantinides VA, Sivagnanam P, Tekkis PT, Reilly P, Emery RJ. Conservative versus operative management of complex proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. Shoulder & Elbow 2010;2: 166-74.
   Google Scholar
• Tingart M, Bathis H, Bouillon B, Tiling T. [The displaced proximal humeral fracture: is there evidence for therapeutic concepts?]. Chirurg 2001;72: 1284-91.
   Google Scholar
• Ilchmann T, Ochsner PE, Wingstrand H, Jonsson K. Non-operative treatment versus tension-band osteosynthesis in three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. A retrospective study of 34 fractures from two different trauma centers. Int Orthop 1998;22: 316-20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, Sproul RC, Feeley BT. Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(10): 612-7.
   Google Scholar
• Leyshon RL. Closed treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55: 48-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lill H, Bewer A, Korner J, Verheyden P, Hepp P, Krautheim I, Josten C. [Conservative treatment of dislocated proximal humeral fractures]. Zentralbl Chir 2001;126: 205- 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urgelli S, Crainz E, Maniscalco P. [Conservative treatment vs prosthetic replacement surgery to treat 3- and 4-fragment fractures of the proximal epiphysis of humerus in the elderly patient]. La Chirurgia degli organi di movimanto 2005;90: 345-51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zyto K. Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Injury 1998;29: 349-52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den HD, De HJ, Schep NW, Tuinebreijer WE. Primary shoulder arthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review. Open Orthop J 2010;4: 87-92.
   Google Scholar
• Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003;34 Suppl 2: B63-B76.
   Google Scholar
• Haidukewych GJ. Innovations in locking plate technology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12: 205-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda MA Locking plate technology and its role in osteoporotic fractures. Injury 2007;38 Suppl 3: S35-S39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer C, Gautier E, Muller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP). Injury 2003; 34 Suppl 2: B43-B54.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75: 741-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Fuchtmeier B, Nerlich M. [Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate]. Unfallchirurg 2004;107: 769-82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessler C, Schmucker U, Matthes G, Ekkernkamp A, Gutschow R, Eggers C. [Results after treatment of instable fractures of the proximal humerus using a fixed-angle plate]. Unfallchirurg 2006;109: 867-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilic B, Uysal M, Cinar BM, Ozkoc G, Demirors H, Akpinar S. [Early results of treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the PHILOS locking plate]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42: 149-53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korkmaz MF, Aksu N, Gogus A, Debre M, Kara AN, Isiklar ZU. [The results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS locking plate.]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42: 97-105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koukakis A, Apostolou CD, Taneja T, Korres DS, Amini A. Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;(442) :115-20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Stavridis SI, Petsatodis G, Christodoulou A. Mid-term results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Philos plate. Injury 2009;40: 1292-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricchetti ET, DeMola PM, Roman D, Abboud JA. The use of precontoured humeral locking plates in the management of displaced proximal humerus fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17: 582-90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahid R, Mushtaq A, Northover J, Maqsood M. Outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated by PHILOS plate internal fixation. Experience of a district general hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 2008;74: 602-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• aap Implantate Proximale Humerusplatte (technical manual). PrFont34Bin0BinSub0Frac0Def1Margin0Margin0Jc1Indent1440Lim0Lim1 http: //w ww aap de/en/Produkte/Osteosynthese/Winkelstabile_Platten/Proximale_Humerusplatte/inde x_html 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker Technical manual. http: //www shoulderdoc co uk/documents/Numelock pdf 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Synthes PHILOS (technical manual). PrFont34Bin0BinSub0Frac0Def1Margin0Margin0Jc1Indent1440Lim0Lim1 http: //w ww shoulderdoc co uk/documents/Philos pdf 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer NCB Proximal Humerus Plating (technical manual). PrFont34Bin0BinSub0Frac0Def1Margin0Margin0Jc1Indent1440Lim0Lim1 http: //www.zimmer.com/web/enUS/pdf/surgical_techniques/NCB_Proximal_Humerus_Plating_System_ Surgical_Technique_Part1 pdf 2010.
   Google Scholar
• George T, Dederichs A, Bellan D, Chaumont PL, Charvet R, Coudane H. Reversed prosthesis for management of complex proximal humeral fractures: a prospective monocenter study [abstract]. 22rd Congress of SECEC, Madrid 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Grisch D, Riede U, Gerber C, Jost B. Inverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly [abstract]. 23rd Congress of SECEC, Lyon 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B, Scherger B, Ostermann PA. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22: 698-704.
   Google Scholar
• Lenarz C, Shishani Y, McCrum C, Nowinski RJ, Edwards TB, Gobezie R. Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient?: early observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;(469) :3324-31.
   Google Scholar
• Reuther F, Proust J, Kohut G, Nijs S. Specially designed inverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures [abstract]. 23rd Congress of SECEC, Lyon 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. Long term functional outcome following reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011;97(6): 583-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riedel BB, Mildren ME, Jobe CM, Wongworawat MD, Phipatanakul WP. Evaluation of the learning curve for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2010: 237-41.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood CAJr., The reverse total shoulder prosthesis. The new kid on the block. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89: 233-5.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber C. Complications and revisions of reverse total shoulder replacements. Nice Shoulder Course 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper A. On the dislocation of the os humeri upon the dorsum scapulae, and upon fractures near the shoulder-joint. Guy’s Hospital Reports 1839;IV: 265-84.
   Google Scholar
• Allen JP. The art of medicine in Ancient Egypt. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Breasted JH. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus: published in facsimile and hieroglyphic transliteration with translation and commentary in two volumes. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Hippocrates. Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate (translation by É. Littré). Vol. 3. Paris: J.-B. Baillière, 1841.
   Google Scholar
• Hippocrates. On Fractures (translation by E.T. Withington). In: Hippocrates. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1928: 95-199.
   Google Scholar
• Oribasii Collectionum Medicarum Reliqviae (ed. Ioannes Raeder). Vol. IV, 1933.
   Google Scholar
• Celsus (translation by W.G. Spencer) De Medicina. Vol. III. London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Albucasis. On surgery and instruments: a definitive edition of the Arabic text with English translation and commentary by M.S. Spink and G.L Lewis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Velpeau A. Nuveaux éléments de médicine opératoire, 5th ed. Paris, 1840.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardo da Vinci. Quaderni d’Anatomia, I-VI (published by Vangensten OCL; Fonahn A; Hopstock H). Christiania: Jacob Dybwad, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardo da Vinci. Atlas der anatomischen Studies in der Sammlung Ihrer Majestät Queen Elizabeth II in Windsor Castle. Vol. III. Gütersloh: Prisma Verlag, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardo da Vinci. Leonardo on the human body (translation by O’Malley and Saunders). New York: Dover Publications, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Duverney M. The diseases of the bones (translated by Samuel Ingham). London: Tho. Osborne, 1762.
   Google Scholar
• Desault PJ, Chopart F. Traité des maladies chirurgicales. Vol. 1-2. Paris, 1796.
   Google Scholar
• Desault PJ. Oeuvres chirurgicales. Première partie: maladies des parties dures. Paris, 1798.
   Google Scholar
• Desault PJ. A treatise on fractures, luxations, and other affections of the bones (translated by Charles Caldwell). Philadelphia: Fry and Kammerer, 1805.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper A. A treatise on dislocations; and on fractures of the joints (first published 1822), 2nd. ed. London, 1823.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper A. A treatise on fractures and dislocations of the joints. Philadelphia: Blanchard and Lea, 1851.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RW. A treatise on fractures in the vicinity of joints and on certain forms of accidental and congenital dislocations. Dublin, 1847.
   Google Scholar
• Malgaigne JF. Mémoir sur les fractures de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus. Journal de Chirurgie 1845;III: 257-64.
   Google Scholar
• Thudichum L. Ueber die am oberen Ende des Humerus vorkommende Knochenbruche (dissertation). Giessen: J. Ricker’sche Buchandlung, 1851.
   Google Scholar
• Liston R. Practical surgery, 2nd ed. London: John Churchill, 1838.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson LA. A practical treatise on fractures and dislocations. New York: Lea Brothers & Co., 1899.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffa A, Grashey R. Verbandlehre (first published 1897), 5th ed. München: J.F. Lehmans Verlag, 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffa A. Lehrbuch der frakturen und luxationen für ärzte und studierende (first published 1888). Würzburg, 1891.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon LW. On the history of the introduction of plaster of paris bandages as a fixation dressing. Bulletin of the Society of Medical History of Chicago 1923;3: 122-32.
   Google Scholar
• van Assen J, Meyerding HW. Antonius Mathijsen, the discoverer of the plaster bandage. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1948;30-A: 1018-9.
   Google Scholar
• van Rens TJ. The history of treatment using plaster of Paris. Acta Orthop Belg 1987;53: 34- 9.
   Google Scholar
• Kocher T. Beiträge zur Kenntniss einiger Praktisch wichtiger Fracturformen. Basel: Carl Sallmann, 1896.
   Google Scholar
• Röntgen W. On a new kind of rays. Nature 1896: 274-6.
   Google Scholar
• Codman EA. The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Malabar, Florida: Krieger, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Neer CS, Brown THJr., , Mclaughlin HL. Fracture of the neck of the humerus with dislocation of the head fragment. Am J Surg 1953;85: 252-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber C, Werner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86: 848-55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72: 365-71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D, Zuckerman JD. Four-part fractures and fracture-dislocations. In: Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ, eds. Shoulder Fractures. The Practical Guide to Management. New York: Thieme, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Tamai K, Ishige N, Kuroda S, Ohno W, Itoh H, Hashiguchi H, Iizawa N, Mikasa M. Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures revisited: a multicenter study on 509 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18: 845-50.
   Google Scholar
• Siwach R, Singh R, Rohilla RK, Kadian VS, Sangwan SS, Dhanda M. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. J Orthop Traumatol 2008;9: 149-53.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Li Z, Zhou F, Wang D, Zhong B. A prospective clinical study of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking proximal humerus plate. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25: 11-7.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson GP, Strauss EJ, Sherman SL Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;(469) :2521-30.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoghi P, Leithner A, Vavken P, Holzer A, Hochreiter J, Weber G, Pietschmann MF, Muller PE. Infraglenoidal scapular notching in reverse total shoulder replacement: a prospective series of 60 cases and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12: 101.
   Google Scholar
• Constant CR. Age related recovery of shoulder function after injury (thesis). Cork, Ireland: University College, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;(214) :160-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17: 355-61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78: 593-600.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvie P, Pollard TC, Chennagiri RJ, Carr AJ. The use of outcome scores in surgery of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87: 151-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JEJr., , Keller SD, Gandek B, Brazier JE, Sullivan M. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11: 525-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33: 159-74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RJ. Kappa and its dependence on marginal rates. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Second ed. Oxford: Wiley, 2005: 2687-69.
   Google Scholar
• Gjorup T. The kappa coefficient and the prevalence of a diagnosis. Methods Inf Med 1988;27: 184-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 96-106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audige L, Bhandari M, Kellam J. How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75: 184-94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen NO, Olsen LH, Nielsen ST. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: the significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fractures. J Orthop Sci 2002;7: 163-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wainwright AM, Williams JR, Carr AJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82: 636-42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirschl DR, Adams GL A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model. J Orthop Trauma 1997;11: 471-6.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright AM, Williams JR, Carr AJ Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82: 636-42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschmann MT, Quarz V, Audige L, Ludin D, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, Gross T Internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an anatomically preshaped interlocking plate: a clinical and radiologic evaluation. J Trauma 2007;63: 1314-23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AM, Mardones RM, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16: 14-24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plecko M, Kraus A. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the locking proximal humerus plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2005;17: 25-50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krivohlavek M, Lukas R, Taller S, Sram J .[Use of angle-stable implants for proximal humeral fractures: prospective study]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2008;75: 212-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirveaux F, Wein-Remy F, Block D, Sedaghatien J, Roche O, Molé D. Early functional results of the reversed prosthesis for acute fractures in elderly are improved by tuberosity healing [abstract]. 23rd Congress of SECEC, Lyon 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Emily S, Dordain F, Lebel B, Hulet C, Vielpeau C. Influence of restoration of the external rotation in proximal humeral fracture treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty [abstract]. 22rd Congress of SECEC, Madrid 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen JV, Jakobsen J, Brorson S, Olsen BS. The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry: clinical outcome and short-term survival of 2,137 primary shoulder replacements. Acta Orthop 2012;83: 171-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audige L, Bhandari M, Griffin D, Middleton P, Reeves BC. Systematic reviews of nonrandomized clinical studies in the orthopaedic literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;(427) :249-57.
   Google Scholar
• Norris SL, Atkins D. Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions. Ann Intern Med 2005;142: 1112-9.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari M, Tornetta PIII, , Ellis T, Audige L, Sprague S, Kuo JC, Swiontkowski MF. Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124: 10-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7: iii-173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brorson S, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Johannsen HV, Sorensen AK, Hrobjartsson A. Effect of osteosynthesis, primary hemiarthroplasty, and non- surgical management for displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly: a multi-centre, randomised clinical trial. Trials 2009;10: 51.
   Google Scholar
• Den HD, Van Lieshout EM, Tuinebreijer WE, Polinder S, Van Beeck EF, Breederveld RS, Bronkhorst MW, Eerenberg JP, Rhemrev S, Roerdink WH, Schraa G, Van der Vis HM, Van Thiel TP, Patka P, Nijs S, Schep NW. Primary hemiarthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly (ProCon): a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11: 97.
   Google Scholar
• Handoll H, Brealey S, Rangan A, Torgerson D, Dennis L, Armstrong A, Chuang LH, Cross B, Dumville J, Gardner S, Goodchild L, Hamilton S, Hewitt C, Madhok R, Maffulli N, Micklewright L, Wadsworth V, Wallace A, Williams J, Worthy G. Protocol for the ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10: 140.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek PA, van dA-S, I, Wendt KW, Diercks RL. Hemiarthroplasty versus angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13: 16.
   Google Scholar
• Launonen AP, Lepola V, Flinkkila T, Strandberg N, Ojanpera J, Rissanen P, Malmivaara A, Mattila VM, Elo P, Viljakka T, Laitinen M. Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13: 167.
   Google Scholar
• Littré Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate. Paris, 1841.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann E, Bruns P. Handbuch der praktischen chirurgie. Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, 1901.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton FH. A practical treatise on fractures and dislocations, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Henry C. Lea, 1866.
   Google Scholar