Fixation and loosening of hip prostheses

References

• Brand R A, Yoder S A, Pedersen DR. Interobserver variability in interpreting radiographic lucencies about total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop 1985; 192: 237–9
   Google Scholar
• Bobyn J D, Engh C A, Glassman AH. Radiography and histology of a threaded acetabular implant. One case studied at two years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1988; 70(2)302–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs M E, Koeweiden E MJ, Slooff T JJH, Huiskes R, van Horn JR. Plain radiographs inadequate for evaluation of the cement-bone interface in the hip prosthesis. A cadaver study of femoral stems. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(5)541–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson ÅS, Gentz C-F. Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis in the Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1980; 147: 262–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson G H, Hedeboe J, Kjær J. Mechanical loosening after hip replacement. Incidence after 10 years in 125 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56(4)314–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paterson M, Fulford P, Denham R. Loosening of the femoral component after total hip replacement. the thin black line and the sinking hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1986; 68(3)392–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray W R, Rodrigo JJ. Arhhrography for the assessment of pain after total hip replacement. A comparison of arthrographic findings in patients with and without pain. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1975; 57(8)1060–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Neill D A, Harris WH. Failed total hip replacement. Assessment by plain radiographs, arthrograms, and aspiration of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66(4)540–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uri G, Wellman H, Capello W, Robb J, Greenman G. Scintigraphic and X-ray arthrographic diagnosis of femoral prosthesis loosening. Concise communication. J Nucl Med 1984; 25(6)661–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxon H R, Hi Schneider, Hopson C N, Miller E H, von Stein D E, Kereiakes J G, Cummings D D, McDevitt RM. A comparative study of indium-III DTPA radionuclide and iothalamate meglumine roentgenographic arthrography in the evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; 245: 156–9
   Google Scholar
• Häckel H, König B, Mostbeck A, Pflüger W. Zur Wertigkeit der Knochenszintigraphie bei Kunstgelenklockerungen. Z Orthop 1978; 116(5)727–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss P E, Mall J C, Hoffer P B, Murray W R, Rodrigo J J, Genant HK. 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone imaging in the evaluation of total hip prostheses. Radiology 1979; 133(3)727–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Utz J A, Lull R J, Galvin EG. Asymptomatic total hip prosthesis. Natural history determined using Tc-99m MDP bone scans. Radiology 1986; 161(2)509–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(Suppl 232)1–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kärrholm J. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(4)491–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Radiol 1990; 31(2)113–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjöberg B. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. the importance of heat injury. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57(Suppl 221)1–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand R A, Pedersen D R, Yoder SA. How definition of “loosening” affects the incidence of loose total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop 1986; 210: 185–91
   Google Scholar
• Mjöberg B, Franzén H, Selvik G. Early detection of prosthetic-hip loosening. Comparison of low- and high-viscosity bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61(3)273–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charniey J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Theory and practice. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1979; 25–40
   Google Scholar
• Brooker A F, Jr, Collier JP. Evidence of bone ingrowth into a porous-coated prosthesis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66(4)619–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(1)45–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasty M, Maloney W J, Bragdon C R, Haire T, Harris WH. Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(8)1220–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder L, Hansson H-A. Ultrastructural aspects of the interface between bone and cement in man. Report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1983; 65(5)646–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson ÅS, Gentz C-F, Linder L. Localized bone resorption in the femur in mechanical failure of cemented total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 1983; 54(3)396–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson ÅS, Gentz C-F. Radiographic versus clinical loosening of the acetabular component in noninfected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1984; 185: 145–50
   Google Scholar
• Maloney W J, Jasty M, Harris W H, Galante J O, Callaghan JJ. Endosteal erosion in association with stable uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(7)1025–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown I W, Ring PA. Osteolytic changes in the upper femoral shaft following porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985; 67(2)218–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maloney W J, Jasty M, Rosenberg A, Harris WH. Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(6)966–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tallroth K, Eskola A, Santavirta S, Konttinen Y T, Lindholm TS. Aggressive granulomatous lesions after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71(4)571–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson R A, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone injury. A vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50(1)101–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson R A, Albrektsson T. The effect of heat on bone regeneration. An experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42(11)705–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labitzke R, Paulus M. Intraoperative Temperaturmessungen in der Hüftchirurgie während der Polymerisation des Knochenzementes Palacos. Arch Orthop Unfnllchir 1974; 79(4)341–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huiskes R. Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 51(Suppl 185)43–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sih G C, Connelly G M, Berman AT. The effect of thickness and pressure on the curing of PMMA bone cement for the total hip joint replacement. J Biornech 1980; 13(4)347–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seidel H, Eggert A, Pietsch H. Intraoperative Temperaturmessungen an der Zementknochengrenze bei TEP-Implantation. Arch Orthop Unfallrhir 1977; 90(3)251–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toksvig-Larsen S, Franzén H, Ryd L. Cement interface temperature in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1991; 62(2)102–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjöberg B, Selvik G. Reduced risk for loosening of hip prostheses with a new cold-curing bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59(3)343–5
   Google Scholar
• Wykman A. Bone reaming and heat. An in vivo study of temperature elevations during bone reaming in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61(Suppl 239)90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundskog J. Heat and bone tissue. An experimental investigation of the thermal properties of bone tissue and threshold levels for thermal injury. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 6(Suppl 9)1–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feith R. Side-effects of acrylic cement implanted into bone. A histological, (micro) angiographic, fluorescence-microscopic, and autoradiographic study in the rabbit femur. Acta Orthop Scand 1975; 46(Suppl 161)3–136
   Google Scholar
• Willert H-G, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty. A long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1974; 56(7)1368–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brånemark P-I, Hansson B O, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Öhman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 11(Suppl 16)1–132
   Google Scholar
• Linder L, Lindberg L, Carlsson Å. Aseptic loosening of hip prostheses. A histologic and enzyme histochemical study. Clin Orthop 1983; 175: 93–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldring S R, Schiller A L, Roelke M, Rourke C M, O'Neill D A, Harris WH. The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1983; 65(5)575–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perren S M, Ganz R, Rüter A. Oberflächliche Knochenresorption urn Implantate. Med Orthop Techn 1975; 95(1)6–10
   Google Scholar
• Perren SM. The induction of bone resorption by prosthetic loosening. The cementless fixation of hip endoprostheses, E Morscher. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1984; 39–41
   Google Scholar
• Pilliar R M, Lee J M, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop 1986; 208: 108–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson G BJ, Freeman M AR, Swanson S AV. Loosening of the cemented acetabular cup in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54(4)590–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volz R G, Wilson RJ. Factors affecting the mechanical stability of the cemented acetabular component in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1977; 59(4)501–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson ÅS, Gentz C-F, Sanzén L. Socket loosening after hip arthroplasty: Radiographic observations in 241 cases up to 15 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57(2)97–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snorrason F, Kärrholm J. Migration of cemented acetabular prosthesis. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(Suppl 231)35
   Google Scholar
• Mulroy R D, Jr, Harris WH. The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(5)757–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snorrason F, Kärrholm J. Early loosening of revision hip arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5(3)217–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dohmae Y, Bechtold J E, Sherman R E, Puno R M, Gustilo RB. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; 236: 214–20
   Google Scholar
• Beckenbaugh R D, Ilstrup DM. Total hip arthroplasty. A review of three hundred and thirty-three cases with long follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1978; 60(3)306–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen B, Jensen JS. Biomechanical factors in loosening of the Stanmore hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56(1)21–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin J B, Gie G A, Lee A JC, Ling R SM, Volz RG. Cementing technique and the effects of bleeding. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(4)620–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halawa M, Lee A JC, Ling R SM, Vangala SS. The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1978; 92(1)19–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause W R, Krug W, Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop 1982; 163: 290–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A JC, Ling R SM, Vangala SS. Some clinically relevant variables affecting the mechanical behaviour of bone cement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1978; 92(1)1–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarr R R, Clarke I C, Gruen T A, Sarmiento A. Predictions of cement bone failure criteria: Three dimensional finite element models versus clinical reality of total hip replacements. Finite elements in biomechanics, R H Gallagher, B R Simon, P C Johnson, JF Gross. J Wiley & Sons, New York 1982; 345–59
   Google Scholar
• Markolf K L, Amstutz HC. A comparative experimental study of stresses in femoral total hip replacement components. the effects of prostheses orientation and acrylic fixation. J Biomech 1976; 9(2)73–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Trends of mechanical consequences and modeling of a fibrous membrane around femoral hip prostheses. J Biomech 1990; 23(10)991–1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris W H, Schiller A L, Scholler J M, Freiberg R A, Scott R. Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1976; 58(5)612–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott W W, Jr, Riley L H, Jr, Dorfman HD. Focal lytic lesions associated with femoral stem loosening in total hip prosthesis. Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144(5)977–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony P P, Gie G A, Howie C R, Ling R SM. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(6)971–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia U E, Ceciliani L, Wilkinson M J, Dell'Orbo C. Involvement of metal particles in loosening of metal-plastic total hip prostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1985; 104: 164–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox D W, Schofield B H, McDonald D F, Riley L H, Jr. A histologic comparison of aseptic loosening of cemented, press-fit, and biologic ingrowth prostheses. Clin Orthop 1987; 225: 171–91
   Google Scholar
• Goodman S B, Fornasier V L, Kei J. The effects of bulk versus particulate polymethylmethacrylate on bone. Clin Orthop 1988; 232: 255–62
   Google Scholar
• Howie D W, Vernon-Roberts B, Oakeshott R, Manthey B. A rat model of resorption of bone at the cement-bone interface in the presence of polyethylene wear particles. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70(2)257–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D W, Rushton N. Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocytose particles. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(6)988–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linder L, Carlsson Å, Marsal L, Bjursten L M, Brånemark P-I. Clinical aspects of osseointegration in joint replacement. A histological study of titanium implants. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1988; 70(4)550–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linder L, Carlsson ÅS. The bone-cement interface in hip arthroplasty. A histologic and enzyme study of stable components. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57(6)495–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wroblewski B M, Lynch M, Atkinson J R, Dowson D, Isaac GH. External wear of the polyethylene socket in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(1)61–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franzén H, Mjöberg B. Wear and loosening of the hip prosthesis. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric 3-year study of 14 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61(6)499–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydell NW. Forces acting on the femoral head-prosthesis. A study on strain gauge supplied prostheses in living persons. Acta Orthop Scand 1966; 37(Suppl 88)119–24
   Google Scholar
• Paul JP. Design aspects of endo prostheses for the lower limb. Perspectives in biomedical engineening, RM Kenedi. MacMillan, London 1972; 91–4
   Google Scholar
• Crowninshield R D, Johnston R C, Andrews J G, Brand RA. A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J Biomech 1978; 11(1–2)75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wroblewski BM. The mechanism of fracture of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement. Int Orthop 1979; 3(2)137–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjöberg B, Hansson L I, Selvik G. Instability of total hip prostheses at rotational stress. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55(5)504–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy D T, Kotzar G M, Brown R H, Heiple K G, Goldberg V M, Heiple K G, Jr, Berilla J, Burstein AH. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70(1)45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L C, Hungerford DS. Cement disease. Clin Orthop 1987; 225: 192–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morscher E. The cementless fixation of hip endoprostheses. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1984
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-MacDonald J, Morscher E, Masar Z. Cementless uncoated polyethylene acetabular components in total hip replacement. Review of five- to 10-year results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(3)423–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snorrason F, Kärrholm J. Primary migration of fully-threaded acetabular prostheses. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(4)647–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tooke S M, Nugent P J, Chotivichit A, Goodman W, Kabo JM. Comparison of in vivo cementless acetabular fixation. Clin Orthop 1988; 235: 253–60
   Google Scholar
• Schimmel J-W, Huiskes R. Primary fit of the Lord cementless total hip. A geometric study in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59(6)638–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh C A, Griffin W L, Marx CL. Cementless acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(1)53–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook S D, Thomas K A, Haddad R J, Jr. Histologic analysis of retrieved human porous-coated total joint components. Clin Orthop 1988; 234: 90–101
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Snorrason F. Postoperative stability of press-fit acetabular prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(Suppl 231)36
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan J J, Dysart S H, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70(3)337–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey J R, Harris WH. Loosening of cobalt chrome beads from a porous-coated acetabular component. A report of ten cases. Clin Orthop 1988; 231: 97–102
   Google Scholar
• Chamley J, Kettlewell J. The elimination of slip between prosthesis and femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1965; 47(1)56–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider E, Eulenberger J, Steiner W, Wyder D, Friedman R J, Perren SM. Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. J Biomech 1989; 22(6–7)735–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider E, Kinast C, Eulenberger J, Wyder D, Eskilsson G, Perren SM. A comparative study of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 1989; 248: 200–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips T W, Messieh S S, McDonald PD. Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(3)431–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wykman A, Selvik G, Goldie I. Subsidence of the femoral component in the noncemented total hip. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59(6)635–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Snorrason F. Subsidence, tip and hump micromovements of noncoated ribbed femoral prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61(Suppl 239)85
   Google Scholar
• Nistor L, Blaha J D, Källström U, Selvik G. In vivo measurements of relative motion between an uncemented femoral total hip component and the femur by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Clin Orthop 1991; 269: 220–7
   Google Scholar
• Mjöberg B. Early loosening of the uncemented total hip (letter). Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(1)126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schicha H, Perner K, Voth E, Reith H G, Willert H G, Emrich D. Zementfreie Implantation von Zweymüller-Endler-Totalendoprothesen der Hüfte: Klinische, röntgenologische and szintigraphische Verlaufskontrolle über zwei Jahre. Nuklearmedizin 1986; 25(2)55–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persen L, Berg V, Benum P, Johnsen H. Parhofer uncemented total hip replacement. A 2 to 4 years follow-up study. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59(Suppl 227)29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oswald S G, van Nostrand D, Savory C G, Callaghan JJ. Three-phase bone scan and indium white blood cell scintigraphy following porous coated hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of the prosthetic tip. J Nucl Med 1989; 30(8)1321–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snorrason F, Kärrholm J, Löwenhielm G, Hietala S-O, Hansson LI. Poor fixation of the Mittelmeier hip prosthesis. A clinical, radiographic, and scintimetric evaluation. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60(1)81–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchert P K, Vaughn B K, Mallory T H, Engh C A, Bobyn JD. Excessive metal release due to loosening and fretting of sintered particles on porous-coated hip prostheses. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68(4)606–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santavirta S, Hoikka V, Eskola A, Konttinen Y T, Paavilainen T, Tallroth K. Aggressive granulomatous lesions in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(6)980–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner T M, Sumner D R, Urban R M, Rivero D P, Galante JO. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68(9)1396–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portigliatti Barbos M. Bone ingrowth into madreporic prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1988; 70(1)85–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haddad R J, Cook S D, Brinker MR. A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(1)2–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruen T A, McNeice G M, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh I, Harris WH. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1978; 60(1)75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob H AC, Huggler AH. An investigation into biomechanical causes of prosthesis stem loosening within the proximal end of the human femur. J Biomech 1980; 13(2)159–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markolf K L, Amstutz H C, Hirschowitz DL. The effect of calcar contact on femoral component micro-movement. A mechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1980; 62(8)1315–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crowninshield R D, Brand R A, Johnston R C, Pedersen DR. An analysis of collar function and the use of titanium in femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop 1981; 158: 270–7
   Google Scholar
• Lewis J L, Askew M J, Wixson R L, Kramer G M, Tarr RR. The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66(2)280–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djerf K, Gillquist J. Calcar unloading after hip replacement. A cadaver study of femoral stem designs. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58(2)97–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetsch P. Development of raised temperature after osteotomies. J Maxillofac Surg 1974; 2(2–3)141–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krause W R, Bradbury D W, Kelly J E, Lunceford EM. Temperature elevations in orthopaedic cutting operations. J Biomech 1982; 15(4)267–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside L A, Amador D, Russell K. The effects of the collar on total hip femoral component subsidence. Clin Orthop 1988; 231: 120–6
   Google Scholar