Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures: Additional CT of minor value

References

• Andersen E, Jorgensen L G, Hededam L T. Evans' classification of trochanteric fractures: an assessment of the inter-observer and intraobserver reliability. Injury 1990; 21: 377–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass J C, Chiles C. Visual skill. Correlation with detection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Invest Radiol 1990; 9: 994–8
   Google Scholar
• Berbaum K S, Franken E A, Dorfman D D, et al. Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 133–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein J, Adler L M, Blank J E, Dalsey R M, Williams G R, Iannotti J R. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78: 1371–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billet F PJ, Schmitt W GH, Gay B. Computed tomography in traumatology with special regard to the advances of three-dimensional display. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1992; 111: 131–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brien H, Noftall F, MacMaster S, Cummings T, Landells C, Rockwood R. Neer's classification system: a critical appraisal. J Trauma 1995; 38: 257–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burstein A H. Editorial. Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75: 1743–4
   Google Scholar
• Cowell H R. Editorial. Patient care and scientific freedom. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76: 640–1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frandsen P A, Andersen E, Madsen F, Skjødt T. Garden's classification of femoral neck fractures. An assessment of the interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1988; 70: 588–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haber R N. Nature of the effect of set on perception. Psychol Rev 1966; 73: 335–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob R J, Miniaci A, Anson P S, Jaberg H, Osterwalder A, Ganz R. Four-part valgus impacted fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73: 295–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jurik A G, Albrechsen J. The use of computed tomography with two- and three-dimensional reconstructions in the diagnosis of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 800–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilcoyne R F, Shuman W P, Matsen F A, Morris M, Rock-Wood C A. The Neer classification of displaced proximal humeral fractures: spectrum of findings on plain radiographs and CT scans. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 1029–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinnunen J, Gothlin J H, Totterman S. Effect of training and experience on radiologic diagnostic performance in mid-facial trauma. Acta Radiol 1988; 28: 83–7
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer H C. Ramifications of a population model for k as a coefficient of reliability. Psychometrika 1979; 44: 461–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreder H J, Hanel D P, McKee M, Jupiter J, McGillivary G, Swiontkowski M F. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78: 726–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristiansen B, Christensen S W. Proximal humeral fractures. Late results in relation to classification and treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58: 124–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen B, Andersen U LS, Olsen C A, Varmarken J E. The Neer classfication of fractures of the proximal humerus. Skeletal Radiol 1988; 17: 420–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C K, Hansen H R. Posttraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head in displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Trauma 1981; 21: 788–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyshon R L. Closed treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 48–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller M E, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, New York 1990; 54–63
   Google Scholar
• Neer C S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1970a; 52: 1077–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neer C S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1970b; 52: 1090–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neer C S. Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures. Shoulder surgery, S Copeland. W B Saunders Company Ltd, London 1997; 321–31
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J O, Dons-Jensen H, Sørensen H T. Lauge-Hansen classification of malleolar fractures. An assessment of the reproducibility in 118 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61: 385–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen S, Hvass I, Dalsgaard J, Christensen B S, Holstad E. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: results of conservative treatment. Injury 1992; 23: 41–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidor M L, Zuckerman J D, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N. The Neer classification system for proximal humerus fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75: 1745–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenrock K A, Gerber C. The reproducibility of the classification of the fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75: 1751–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stableforth P G. Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1984; 66: 104–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen H JG, Fabricius J, Bar-Lebo H, Olsen S. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses, with special reference to kappa statistics. AP-MIS 1989; 97: 689–98
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen N OB, Overgaard S, Olsen L H, Hansen H, Nielsen S T. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73: 676–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zyto K, Kronberg M, Broström L Å. Shoulder function after displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder & Elbow Surg 1995; 4: 331–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar