Assessment of computer task performance (ACTP) of children and youth with intellectual and developmental disability

References

• Bryant BR, Seay PC. The Technology-Related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act: relevance to individuals with learning disabilities and their advocates. J Learn Disabil 1998;31:4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyburn D, 2007. Re-examining the role of assistive technology in learning. Closing the Gap 25:5. Available at: https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/edyburn/www/ATinDepth.pdf. Accessed on 16 April 16, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Smith O. Measuring the outcome of assistive technology: a challenge and innovation. Assist Technol 1996;8:71–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund ML, Nygard L. Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. Occup Ther J Res 2003;3:67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, editor. Assistive technology matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington DC: APA Books; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuer A, Sachs D, Rimmerman A. Adjustment to severe disability: constructing and examining a cognitive and occupational performance model. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;29:201–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper S, Raharinirina S. Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Spec Educ Tech, 2006;21:47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mechling LC. Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities to initiate and complete daily tasks: a literature review. Educ Train Dev Disabil, 2007;42:252–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss-Lambrou R. Satisfaction and comfort. In: Scherer MJ, editors. Assistive technology matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington DC: APA Books; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RO. 2005. Integrated multi-intervention paradigm for assessment and application of concurrent treatments, (IMPACT2) Model. Available at: http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/archive/impact2model.html. Accessed on 16 April, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Petty LS, McArthur L, Treviranus J. Clinical report: use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in vision technology. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72:309–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrkljan BH, Miller-Polgar J. Meaning of occupational engagement in life-threatening illness: a qualitative pilot project. Can J Occup Ther 2001;68:237–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hastings-Kraskowsky L, Finlayson M. Factors about older adults’ use of adaptive equipment: Review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther 2001;55:303–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraskowsky LH, Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults’ use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther 2001;55:303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruland CM, White T, Stevens M, Fanciullo G, Khilani SM. Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:573–579.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matson L, Mayville B, Laud B. A system of assessment for adaptive behavior, social skills, behavioral function, medication side-effects, and psychiatric disorders. Res Dev Disabil 2003;24:75–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon N, Duffy LC, Granger CV, Braun S. Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:186–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Vincent C, Mazer B. Development of a standardized instrument to assess computer task performance. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Mazar B. Assessment of Computer Task Performance (ACTP), Version 2. 2003. Québec: Institute de réadaptions en déficience physique, and Université LAVAL
   Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Mazer B. Validation of the revised child version of the Assessment of Computer Task Performance. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008;28:235–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent C, Bisson J, Langlois É, Cantin JF. Utilisation d’une interface cerveau-ordinateur par un client présentant un traumatisme craniocérébral. Can J Occup Ther 2010;77:100–112.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Durand A. Rapport de recherche: Finalisation de la standardisation de la version pour enfants du Test du rendement dans l’utilisation de l’ordinateur. Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ming-Chung C, Ling-Fu M, Cheng-Feng H, Ting-Fang W, Chi-Nung C, Tien-Yu L. Computerized Assessment Tool for Mouse Operating Proficiency, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2004; 3118:849–856.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler-Loeff A, Shahak Y. Research report. People with disabiities in Arab society in Israel: An opportunity for social change. JDC ISRAEL The Unit for Disabilities and Rehabilitation, 2006. Retrieved from the World Wide Web 23-10-2011. Available at:http://www2.jdc.org.il/files/disability/publications/arab-disability-english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska R, & De Witte L. An international content validity of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Occup Ther Int 1999; 6:159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice (2nd Ed.). 2002 Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Ska B, Giroux F, Weiss Lambrou R. Stability and reproducibility of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). J Rehabil Outcomes Measure 1999;3:42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Descent M, Jutai J, Wolfson C. The psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version. Qua Life Res 2002;11:583–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YJ, Lenker JA. (2006). The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006;1:49–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krombholz H. (2006). Physical performance in relation to age, sex, birth order, social class, and sports activities of preschool children. Perceptl Mot Skills 2006;102:477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigal RA. Which handedness: Preferences or performance? Percept Mot Skills 1992;75:851–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohgi A, Rasetti R, Avidano F, Manzone C, Orsi L, D’Agata F, Caroppo P, et al. The effect of gender on planning: An FMRI study using the Tower of London task. NeuroImage 2006;33:999–1010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schreuer N. Accommodations outcomes and the ICF framework. Assist Technol 2009;21:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter S. The learning environment as a challenge enhancing development. Issues SpecEduc Rehabil 2003;18:87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Gierach J. (2009). Assessing students need for assistive technology, editor. Milton, WI:CESA 2. Available at: http://www.wati.org Accessed 2011 April 16.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim L, & Harber K. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2005;9:131–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronen C. Mental Retardation. Kiryat-Byalik: Ach. (Hebrew); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Living in the state of stuck: How technologies impact the lives of people with disabilities. Cambridge. MA: Brookline Books; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment? Assist Technol 1995;7:3–8; discussion 9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Switzky HN, & Greenspan S. 2003. What is mental retardation? ideas for an evolving disability. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. Available at: http://www.disabilitybooksonline.com Accessed on 16 April, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zigler E, Bennett-Gates D, Hodapp R, Henrich CC. Assessing personality traits of individuals with mental retardation. Am J Ment Retard 2002;107:181–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomporowski PD, Tinsley V. Attention in mentally retarded persons In: W. MacLean, editor Ellis’ Handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1997. pp. 219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuer N., & Sachs D (2009).The use of computers as facilitators for leisure and social participation of children with disabilities: An outcome study of a national project. Jerusalem: Ashalim, The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Israel (in Hebrew; to be published in English).
   Google Scholar