Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life

References

• Roeschlein RA, Domholdt E. Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int 1989;13:14–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saradjian A, Thompson AR, Datta D. The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:871–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland AE, Psonak R. Traumatic below-elbow amputations. Orthopedics 2007;30:120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kejlaa GH. The social and economic outcome after upper limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992;16:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durance JP, O’Shea BJ. Upper limb amputees: a clinic profile. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:68–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lake C, Dodson R. Progressive upper limb prosthetics. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2006;17:49–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Østlie K, Skjeldal OH, Garfelt B, Magnus P. Adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway: prevalence, demographic features and amputation specific features. A population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1636–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:236–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LE, Davidson JH. The long-term outcome of upper limb amputees treated at a rehabilitation centre in Sydney, Australia. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:437–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:71–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger N. Studies of the upper-extremity amputee. II. The population (1953-55). Artif Limbs 1958;5:57–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:172–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RB, Walley M. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herberts P, Körner L, Caine K, Wensby L. Rehabilitation of unilateral below-elbow amputees with myoelectric prostheses. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980;12:123–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kestner S. Defining the relationship between prosthetic wrist function and its use in performing work tasks and activities of daily living. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:80–86.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger AJ, Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Lum PS. Feedforward control strategies of subjects with transradial amputation in planar reaching. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010;47:201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland LV, Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, Jones M, Esquenazi A. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010;47:299–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sener G, Algun C, Karaduman A, Yakut Y. Outcome of activities of daily living in upper limb amputees. Clin rehabil 1989;3:103–105.
   Google Scholar
• Graham B, Adkins P, Tsai TM, Firrell J, Breidenbach WC. Major replantation versus revision amputation and prosthetic fitting in the upper extremity: a late functional outcomes study. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:783–791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta D, Kingston J, Ronald J. Myoelectric prostheses for below-elbow amputees: the Trent experience. Int Disabil Stud 1989;11:167–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraser CM. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:216–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking HG, van den Berg JP, Dahmen KT, Post MW. Long-term outcome of upper limb prosthetic use in the Netherlands. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;7:179–181.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins DJ. Adult upper-limb prosthetic training. In: Atkins DJ, Meyer 3rd RH editors Comprehensive management of the upper-limb amputee. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989. pp 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins DJ. Adult upper limb prosthetic training. In: Bowker H, Michael J editors Atlas of limb prosthetics:surgical, prosthetic and rehabilitation principles. 2 ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1992. pp 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnaas ADL-index [Internet]. Nesoddtangen, Norway: Sunnaas Hospital Trust; c2008 - cited 2011 Jan 03. Available at: http://sunnaas.no/fagfolk/temasider/faggrupper/ergoterapeut/Sider/sunnaas-adl-index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sunnaas ADL-index [Internet]. Oslo, Norway: Diakonhjemmet Hospital; c2007 - cited 2011 Jan 03. Available at: http://www.diakonsyk.no/modules/module_123/proxy.asp?D = 2&C = 634&I = 2665
   Google Scholar
• Vardeberg K, Kolsrud M, Laberg T. Sunnaas index of ADL. WFOT bulletin 1991;24:30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Østlie K, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P. Health services utilisation in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. J Rehab Med . (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Silcox DH 3rd, Rooks MD, Vogel RR, Fleming LL. Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1781–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millstein SG, Heger H, Hunter GA. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986;10:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, NiMhurchadha S, Gallagher P, Hofkamp S, MacLachlan M, Wegener ST. Identifying the values and preferences of prosthetic users: a case study series using the repertory grid technique. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009;33:157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kejlaa GH. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983;7:141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran B, Hambrey R. The prosthetic treatment of upper limb deficiency. Prosthet Orthot Int 1991;15:82–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaine WJ, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg Br 1997;22:73–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burger H, Marinček C. Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994;18:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta D, Ibbotson V. Prosthetic rehabilitation of upper limb amputees: a five year review. Clin Rehabil 1991;5:311–316.
   Google Scholar
• Pylatiuk C, Schulz S, Döderlein L. Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:723–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey SL, HighsmithMJ, Maitland ME, Dubey RV. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. Clin Biomech 2008;23:1128–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østlie K, Franklin RJ, Skjeldal OH, Skrondal A, Magnus P. Musculoskeletal pain and overuse syndromes in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1967–1973.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzur MS, Angelats J, Light TR, Izuierdo R, Pluth T. Functional outcome following traumatic upper limb amputation and prosthetic limb fitting. J Hand Surg Am 1994;19:836–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LE, Davidson J. A review of the management of upper-limb amputees. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1997;8:297–322.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskaranand K, Bhat AK, Acharya KN. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:363–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake C. Effects of prosthetic training on upper-extremity prosthesis use. J Prosthet Orthot 1997;9:3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Carter I, Torrance WN, Merry PH. Functional results following amputation of the upper limb. Ann Phys Med 1969;10:137–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:60–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly W. Upper extremity socket design options. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2000;11:627–638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Østlie K, Franklin RJ, Skjeldal OH, Skrondal A, Magnus P. Assessing physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees by combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and clinical examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1636–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008;3:181–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Maclachlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol 2000;45:130–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H, Franchignoni F, Heinemann AW, Kotnik S, Giordano A. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales [Internet]. Dublin, Ireland: Psychoprosthetics group; c1997 - cited 2006 Feb 01. Available at: www.tcd.ie/Psychoprosthetics/pages/tapes.html
   Google Scholar