A home-based individualized information communication technology training program for older adults: a demonstration of effectiveness and value

References

• Turner P, Turner S, Van DeWalle G. How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behav Inf Technol 2007;26:287–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson CM, Santorelli MJ, Kamber M. Toward an inclusive measure of broadband adoption. Int J Commun 2012;6:2555–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor D, Firth L, Moore K. Can the Internet improve the well-being of the elderly? Age Int 2008;32:25–42
   Google Scholar
• Boot WR, Charness N, Czaja SR, et al. Computer proficiency questionnaires: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. Gerontologist 2013;54:333–52
   Google Scholar
• Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S. The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature 2008;451:716–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood E, Lanzura C, Baciu I, et al. Instructional styles, attitudes and experiences of seniors in computer workshops. Educ Gerontol 2010;36:834–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatto SL, Tak ST. Computer, internet and e-mail use among older adults: benefits and barriers. Educ Gerontol 2008;34:800–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayago S, Blat J. Telling the story of older people e-mailing: an ethnographical study. Human-Comput Stud 2010;68:105–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 2006;21:333–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves B, Amaro F, Fonseca JRS. Coming of age in the digital age: ICT Usage and non-usage among older adults. Sociol Res Online 2013;18:1–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zickuhr K, Madden M. Older adults and internet use. Pew internet 2012. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/2012/older-adults-and-internet-use.aspx [last accessed 2 Feb 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Rogers WA, Fisk A, Mead SE, et al. Training older adults to use automatic teller machines. Human Factors 1996;38:425–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstead VP, Anderson CR, Yost EA, et al. You can teach an old dog new tricks: a qualitative analysis of how residents of senior living communities may use the web to overcome spatial and social barrier. J Appl Gerontol 2012;32:540–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melenhorst AS, Rogers WA, Bouwhuis DG. Older adults’ motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychol Aging 2006;21:190–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M. Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput Human Behav 2010;26:870–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz MS. Exploring predictors of technology adoption among older adult [dissertation]. Ames, IA: Iowa State University; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Lee B, Chien Y, Hewitt L. Age differences in constraints encountered by seniors in their use of computers and the internet. Comput Human Behav 2011;27:1231–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber L, Watson C. Technology: education needs of older adults. Educat Gerontol 2014;40:16–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers WA, O'Brien MA, Fisk AD. Cognitive engineering to support successful aging. In: Lee JD, Kirlik A, eds. The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013:286–301
   Google Scholar
• Shapira N, Barak A, Gal I. Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use. Aging Ment Health 2007;11:477–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White H, McConnell E, Clipp E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing Internet training and access to older adults. Aging Mental Health 2002;6:213–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun MT. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Comput Human Behav 2013;29:673–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley MD, Barnard Y, Lloyd AD. Digital inclusion: is it time to start talking an exclusion approach to interface design? In: Anderson M, ed. Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors. London: Taylor & Francis; 2010:549–53
   Google Scholar
• Barnard Y, Bradley MD, Hodsgon F, Lloyd AD. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behavior and usability. Comput Human Behav 2013;29:1715–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Renaud K, van Biljon J. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology. New York: Association For Computing Machinery; 2008:210–19
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davi FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003;27:425–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci 2008;39:273–315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil, Special Issue: The Assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs 2002;14:125–31
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework. Am J Occupat Therap 2008;62:625–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shklovski I, Kraut R, Raine I. The Internet and social relationships: contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. J Comp Mediat Commun 2004;10
   Google Scholar
• Shklovski I, Kiesler S, Kraut R. The internet and social interaction: a meta-analysis and critique of studies, 1995–2003′. In: Kraut R, Brynin M, Kieslee S, eds. Computers, phones, and the internet: domesticating information technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:251–64
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Scherer M, Micangeli A, et al. A cross-cultural analysis of relationships between disability self-evaluation and individual predisposition to use assistive technology. In: Craddock GM, McCormack LP, Reilly RB, Knops HTP, eds. Assistive technology: shaping the future. Dublin; Ireland: IOS Press; 2003:941–6
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50:132–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Stone VI, Usiak DJ. “Enabling products”: consumers with limited hand functions evaluate an automatic jar opener. Technol Disabil 2010;22:99–115
   Google Scholar
• Mellor D, Firth L, Moore K. Can the Internet improve the well-being of the elderly? Age Int 2008;32:25–42
   Google Scholar
• Beckenhauer JL, Armstrong J. Exploring relationships between normative aging, technology, and communication. Marriage Fam Rev 2009;45:825–44
   Google Scholar
• Bobiller-Chaumon ME, Michel C, Tarpin-Bernard F, Croisile B. Can ICT improve the quality of life of elderly adults living in residential home care units (RHCU)? From actual impacts to hidden artifacts. Behav Inf Technol 2014;33:574–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar