References
- National SCI Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance [Internet]. Birmingham, AL: Spain Rehab Center; 2013. Available from: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/PublicDocuments/fact_figures_docs/Facts%202013.pdf [last accessed 6 Jun 2014].
- Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology 2012;38:219–26.
- Understanding spinal cord injury [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: Shepherd Center. Available from: http://www.spinalinjury101.org/details/levels-of-injury [last accessed 20 Jun 2014].
- Kawamoto H, Sankai Y. Power assist method based on phase sequence and muscle force condition for HAL. Adv Robotics 2005;19:717–34.
- Dollar AM, Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Robot 2008;24:144–58.
- REX Bionics [Internet]. Auckland, NZ; 2014. Available from: http://www.rexbionics.com/ [last accessed 1 Jul 2014].
- Ekso Bionics [Internet]. Berkeley, CA; 2011-2013. Available from: http://eksobionics.com/ [last accessed 1 Jul 2014].
- Chen G, Chan CK, Guo Z, Yu H. A review of lower extremity assistive robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2013;41:343–63.
- de Blois J, Doyon J, Jubinville C; Conseil consultatif sur les aides technologiques. Petit vocabulaire des aides techniques/Glossary of technical aids, Advisory Committee on Technological Aids [Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux - Quebec], 1994; 72 pages, revised edition. Available from: http://books.google.ca/books/about/Petit_vocabulaire_des_aides_techniques.html?id = G-KGtwAACAAJ&redir_esc = y [last accessed 2 Oct 2014].
- Martin V, Renaud J, Dagenais P; Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Les normes de production des revues systématiques. Guide méthodologique/Production standards for systematic reviews. Methodological guide. [INESSS - Quebec], 2013; 44 pages. Available from: https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/DocuMetho/INESSS_Normes_production_revues_syst%C3%A9matiques.pdf [last accessed 2 Oct 2014].
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. Available from: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000097 [last accessed 31 Oct 2014].
- Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, et al. Guidelines for Critical Review Form: Quantitative Studies. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University Publications; 1999:1–11. Available from: http://www.srsmcmaster.ca/Portals/20/pdf/ebp/quanreview.pdf
- Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, et al. The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence. Oxford, UK: Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford; 2011.
- Mashable [Internet]. New York, NY; 2005. Available from: http://mashable.com/2014/06/30/fda-approves-robotic-exoskeleton-paralyzed-rewalk /[last accessed 16 Jul 2014].
- ReWalk [Internet]. Marlborough, MA. 2014. Available from: http://rewalk.com/products/rewalk-personal/[last accessed 1 Aug 2014].
- Spungen AM, Asselin P, Fineberg DB, et al. Exoskeletal-assisted walking for persons with motor-complete paraplegia. Science and Technology Organization (STO) Human Factors and Medicine Panel. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2013 Apr 15-17, Milan, Italy: Meeting Proceedings - paper 6. Available from: https://www.cso.nato.int/Pubs/rdp.asp?RDP = STO-MP-HFM-228.
- Zeilig G, Weingarden H, Zwecker M, Dudkiewicz I, Bloch AE. Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk[TM] exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35:96–101.
- Talaty M, Esquenazi A, Briceno JE. Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: an analysis of walking kinematics. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013;2013:1–5. Seattle, WA, DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650469.
- Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, Saulino M. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012;91:911–21.
- Asselin P, Fineberg D, Harel NY, et al. One-month follow-up for robotic exoskeletal walking measurements. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36:537–8.
- Indego [Internet]. Nashville, TN; 2014 Available from: http://indego.com/indego/en/home [last accessed 25 Jul 2014].
- Raj AK, Neuhaus PD, Moucheboeuf AM, et al. [Internet]. Mina: a sensorimotor robotic orthosis for mobility assistance. J Robotics 2011, Article ID 284352, 8 pages. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/284352. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jr/2011/284352/ [last accessed 31 Oct 2014].
- Farris R, Quintero H, Murray S, et al. A preliminary assessment of legged mobility provided by a lower limb exoskeleton for persons with paraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2014;22:482–90.
- Neuhaus PD, Noorden JH, Craig TJ, et al. Design and evaluation of Mina: a robotic orthosis for paraplegics. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011;2011:5975468, Zurich, DOI : 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975468.
- Wilson SK, Hasler JP, Dall PM, Granat MH. Objective assessment of mobility of the spinal cord injured in a free-living environment. Spinal Cord 2008;46:352–7.
- Lemay V, Routhier F, Noreau L, et al. Relationships between wheelchair skills, wheelchair mobility and level of injury in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2012;50:37–41.
- Andrews AW, Chinworth SA, Bourassa M, et al. Update on distance and velocity requirements for community ambulation. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2010;33:128–34.
- Watson MJ. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiotherapy 2002;88:386–97.
- Dalyan M, Cardenas DD, Gerard B. Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1999;37:191–5.
- Curtis KA, Drysdale GA, Lanza RD, et al. Shoulder pain in wheelchair users with tetraplegia and paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:453–7.
- Cyberdyne Inc. [Internet]. Tsukuba, Ibaraki; 2004. Available from: http://www.cyberdyne.jp/english/[last accessed 1 Aug 2014].
- Aach M, Cruciger O, Sczesny-Kaiser M, et al. Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury – a pilot study. Spine J 2014;14:2847–53.
- Keeogo Embrace Life [Internet]. Keeogo™ is a motorized walking assistive device worn on the lower body that provides you with the leg power you need to keep on going throughout your day. Available from: http://www.keeogo.com/ [last accessed 13 Jan 2015].
- Bouyer L, Routhier F, Rahn C, McFadyen BJ. Dermoskeletal technology as a means to improve mobility in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. RESNA 2014-Racing Towards Excellence in AT, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 13 June 2014.
- Bionik Laboratories [Internet]. ARKE™. Available from: http://www.bioniklabs.com/product-pipeline/exo-legs/ [last accessed 13 Jan 2015].
- ReWalk [Internet]. Marlborough, MA; 2014. Available from: http://rewalk.com/news/press-release/rewalk-personal-exoskeleton-system cleared-by-fda-for-home-use/ [last accessed 25 Jul 2014].
- ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ [last accessed 6 Aug 2014].
- Today's Medical Development [Internet]. Exoskeleton development. Schoenberger R. Parker Hannifin’s Human Motion & Control business unit continues to refine the design of Indego, a powered orthotic that allows paraplegics to stand and walk. Available from: http://www.onlinetmd.com/tmd0614-powered-orthotic-indego.aspx#.VFI68J21Zjo [last accessed 31 Oct 2014].