References
- Rigby P, Ryan SE, Campbell KA. Electronic aids to daily living and quality of life for persons with tetraplegia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:260–267.
- Brandt Å, Samuelsson K, Töytäri O, et al. Activity and participation, quality of life and user satisfaction outcomes of environmental control systems and smart home technology: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:189–206.
- Croser R, Garrett R, Seeger B, et al. Effectiveness of electronic aids to daily living: increased independence and decreased frustration. Aust J Occup Ther. 2001;48:35–44.
- Harmer J, Bakheit AMO. The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their carers. Br J Occup Ther. 1999;62:394–398.
- Jutai J, Rigby P, Ryan S, et al. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assist Technol. 2000;12:123–131.
- Ripat J, Strock A. Users' perceptions of the impact of electronic aids to daily living throughout the acquisition process. Assist Technol. 2004;16:63–72.
- Rigby P, Ryan S, Joos S, et al. Impact of electronic aids to daily living on the lives of persons with cervical spinal cord injuries. Assist Technol. 2005;17:89–97.
- Verdonck MC, Chard G, Nolan M. Electronic aids to daily living: be able to do what you want. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:268–281.
- Verdonck M, Steggles E, Nolan M, et al. Experiences of using an environmental control system (ECS) for persons with high cervical spinal cord injury: the interplay between hassle and engagement. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:70–78.
- Palmer P, Seale J. Exploring the attitudes to environmental control systems of people with physical disabilities: a grounded theory approach. Technol Disabil. 2007;19:17–27.
- Shone SM, Ryan S, Rigby PJ, et al. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:115–125.
- Von Maltzahn WW, Daphtary M, Roa RL. Usage patterns of environmental control units by severely disabled individuals in their homes. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1995;3:222–227.
- Craig A, Tran Y, McIsaac P, Boord P. The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:32–39.
- Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15:231–238.
- Smith R. A client-centred model for equipment prescription (client’s values and roles, effective use of adaptive equipment). Occup Ther Health Care. 1995;9:39–52.
- Cowan DM, Turner-Smith AR. The user’s perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life? Br J Occup Ther. 1999;62:2–6.
- Orton M. Factors that may be considered by occupational therapists during the assessment of clients for assistive technology and whether it permeates through to the eventual prescription. J Assist Technol. 2008;2:11–22.
- Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2009.
- Lester S. An introduction to phenomenological research. Taunton: Stan Lester Developments; 1999 [cited 2014 Mar 12]. Available from: http://www.sld.demon.co.uk/resmethy.pdf
- Wolcott HF. Writing up qualitative research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2009.
- Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002.
- Langdridge D. Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method. New York: Pearson Education; 2007.
- Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2009.
- Verdonck M, McCormack C, Chard G. Irish occupational therapists’ views of electronic assistive technology. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:185–190.
- Krantz O. Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life – a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:189–198.