Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with gait training in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot randomized clinical trial

References

• Rubinstein TC, Giladi N, et al. The power of cueing to circumvent dopamine deficits: a review of physical therapy treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 2002;17(6):1148–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muslimović D. Cognitive sequelae of Parkinson’s disease: nature, course, risk factors and functional impact [Thesis]. FMG: Psychology Research Institute, AMC-UvA; 2009. p. 192. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.313912
   Google Scholar
• Debaere F, Wenderoth N, et al. Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Neuroimage 2003;19(3):764–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, et al. Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2001;124(11):2131–2146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel M, Ceballos-Baumann A, et al. Evidence for lateral premotor and parietal overactivity in Parkinson’s disease during sequential and bimanual movements. A PET study. Brain 1997;120(6):963–976.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer A. Cueing for freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a rehabilitation perspective. Movement Disorders 2008;23(S2):S475–S481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galletly R, Brauer SG. Does the type of concurrent task affect preferred and cued gait in people with Parkinson’s disease? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2005;51(3):175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, et al. Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson’s disease: the RESCUE trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2007;78(2):134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim I, Van Wegen E, et al. Does cueing training improve physical activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2010;24(5):469–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Yoo JY, et al. The effects of visual and auditory cues on freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson disease. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2012;91(1):2–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha PA, Porfírio GM, et al. Effects of external cues on gait parameters of Parkinson’s disease patients: a systematic review. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2014;124:127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keus SH, Bloem BR, et al. Evidence‐based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson’s disease with recommendations for practice and research. Movement Disorders 2007;22(4):451–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebner HR, Rossmeier C, et al. Short-term motor improvement after sub-threshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor hand area in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2000;178(2):91–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Farweez H, et al. Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. European Journal of Neurology 2003;10(5):567–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaucheur J-P, Drouot X, et al. Improvement of motor performance and modulation of cortical excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004;115(11): 2530–2541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr E, Galal O, et al. Lack of post‐exercise depression of corticospinal excitability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neurology 2007;14(7):793–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flöel A, Rösser N, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008;20(8):1415–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elahi B, Elahi B, et al. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson motor function—systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Movement Disorders 2009;24(3):357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benninger DH, Lomarev M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2010;81(10):1105–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppa S, Oliviero A, et al. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clinical Neurophysiology 2012;123(5):858–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan L, Pullman S, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to SMA worsens complex movements in Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001;112(2):259–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada M, Ugawa Y, et al. High-frequency rTMS over the supplementary motor area improves bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease: subanalysis of double-blind sham-controlled study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2009;287(1):143–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüner U, Eggers C, et al. 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by tDCS over the primary motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease: effects on bradykinesia of arm and hand. Journal of Neural Transmission 2010;117(2):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacherot F, Attarian S, et al. A motor cortex excitability and gait analysis on parkinsonian patients. Movement Disorders 2010;25(16):2747–2755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Simon D, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2005;76(12):1614–1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 2006;21(10):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaski D, Allum J, et al. Applying anodal tDCS during tango dancing in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience Letters 2014a;568:39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche M, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology 2000;527(3):633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001;57(10):1899–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabrun SM, Chipchase LS. Priming the brain to learn: the future of therapy? Manual Therapy 2012;17(2):184–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2009;6:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y-R, Tseng C-Y, et al. Combination of rTMS and treadmill training modulates corticomotor inhibition and improves walking in Parkinson disease: a randomized trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2013;27(1):79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, et al. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giladi N, Tal J, et al. Validation of the freezing of gait questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 2009;24(5):655–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim L, Van Wegen E, et al. Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson’s patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 2005;11(1):19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkman M, Cutson TM, et al. Reliability of impairment and physical performance measures for persons with Parkinson’s disease. Physical Therapy 1997;77(1):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991;39(2):142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris S, Morris ME, et al. Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed “Up & Go” test in people with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy 2001;81(2):810–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris ME, Iansek R. Characteristics of motor disturbance in Parkinson’s disease and strategies for movement rehabilitation. Human Movement Science 1996;15(5):649–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto S, Lombardi I Jr, et al. Brazilian version of the Berg balance scale. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2004;37(9):1411–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muslimović D, Post B, et al. Determinants of disability and quality of life in mild-to-moderate Parkinson disease. Neurology 2008;70(23):2241–2247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, et al. The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson’s disease summary index score. Age and Ageing 1997;26(5):353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsaa EB, Larsen JP, et al. Predictors and course of health‐related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 2008;23(10):1420–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, et al. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 1989;10(4):407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steffen T, Seney M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Physical Therapy 2008;88(6):733–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S-L, Hsieh C-L, et al. Minimal detectable change of the Timed “Up & Go” test and the dynamic gait Index in people with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy 2011;91(1):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman LM, Gruber-Baldini AL, et al. The clinically important difference on the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. Archives of Neurology 2010;67(1):64–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peto V, Jenkinson C, et al. Determining minimally important differences for the PDQ‐39 Parkinson’s disease questionnaire. Age and Ageing 2001;30(4):299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation 2008;1(3):206–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayduk-Costa G, Drummond NM, et al. Anodal tDCS over SMA decreases the probability of withholding an anticipated action. Behavioural Brain Research 2013;257:208–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni AR, Amadera J, et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2011;14(08):1133–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Norman KE. Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait initiation in people with Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006;20(1):36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer SG, Woollacott MH, et al. Single and dual task gait training in people with Parkinson’s disease: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurology 2011;11(1):90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak MK, Hui‐Chan CW. Cued task‐specific training is better than exercise in improving sit‐to‐stand in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Movement Disorders 2008;23(4):501–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding SJ, Barber B, et al. Cueing and gait improvement among people with Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94(3):562–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GN, Byblow WD, et al. Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease: the use of extrinsic, visual cues. Brain 2000;123(10):2077–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, et al. Motor learning in Parkinson’s disease: limitations and potential for rehabilitation. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 2009;15:S53–S58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanakawa T, Fukuyama H, et al. Enhanced lateral premotor activity during paradoxical gait in Parkinson’s disease. Annals of Neurology 1999;45(3):329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaski D, Dominguez R, et al. Combining physical training with transcranial direct current stimulation to improve gait in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2014b;28(11):1115–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaucheur J-P, André-Obadia N, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology 2014;125(11):2150–2206.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmann H, Conde V, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over supplementary motor area (SMA) but not pre-SMA promotes short-term visuomotor learning. Brain Stimulation 2013;6(2):101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Olmo MF, Cheeran B, et al. Role of the cerebellum in externally paced rhythmic finger movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007;98(1):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral ME, Baltar A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training? Neuroreport 2015;26(11):618–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Qian L, et al. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros Galvão SC, Borba Costa dos Santos R, et al. Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014;95(2):222–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianaa R, Laurentinoa G, et al. Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trial 2014;3:4.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha S, Silva E, et al. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation 2016;38(7):653–660.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003;15(4):619–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo M-F, Unger M, et al. Limited impact of homeostatic plasticity on motor learning in humans. Neuropsychologia 2008;46(8):2122–2128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg C, Jayaram G, et al. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 2011;49(5):800–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar